No worries :)
Meanwhile qt5.git integrated and we have a lot more very good content for the
beta!:)
For this particular change it would have helped if not only the no-widget stage
of qt5.git built tests but also the module stage.
Simon
Opprinnelig melding
Fra: Tasuku Suzuki
Sendt: 15:57 lør
Em sáb 15 mar 2014, às 17:41:30, Kurt Pattyn escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> Recently I came across Effective C++ again and saw a chapter regarding
> inline methods. In short, Scott Meyer argued against it, because of
> potential binary compatibility problems, code bloat, and so on.
>
> My question is: is th
Hi,
Recently I came across Effective C++ again and saw a chapter regarding inline
methods.
In short, Scott Meyer argued against it, because of potential binary
compatibility problems, code bloat, and so on.
My question is: is there any convention within Qt about inline methods?
Cheers,
Kurt
_
I apologize about the breakage of the build :'(
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Fix integrated :)
Simon
Fra: Gladhorn Frederik
Sendt: 12:23 lørdag 15. mars 2014
Til: Heikkinen Jani; development@qt-project.org
Emne: Re: [Development] qt5.git integration broken again :(
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,81003
From: development-bounce
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,81003
From: development-bounces+frederik.gladhorn=digia@qt-project.org
[development-bounces+frederik.gladhorn=digia@qt-project.org] on behalf of
Heikkinen Jani [jani.heikki...@digia.com]
Sent: Saturday, March 15,
Hi all,
We have again problems with qt5.git integration, see build log:
http://testresults.qt-project.org/ci/Qt5_stable_Integration/build_00632/linux-g++_no-widgets_Ubuntu_12.04_x64/log.txt.gz
It seems https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,80697 breaks the build.
Someone, please make a fix as
Hi,
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 14:27:27 -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Ah, this is Qt 4, where we got the arch from uname.
> What is reported on Qt 5?
I think this is the relevant part:
|Configure summary
|
| Build type:linux-g++ (unknown, CPU features:)
... which means that some detection
