[Development] Autotest `tst_macgui' failed during qt5.git stable integration

2014-03-13 Thread Heikkinen Jani
Good morning! Autotest `tst_macgui' failed during qt5.git stable integration :( Can someone check? Build log: http://testresults.qt-project.org/ci/Qt5_stable_Integration/build_00630/macx-clang_developer-build_qtnamespace_OSX_10.7/log.txt.gz Same failure seems to happen also in qtbase stable int

Re: [Development] Harmonizing the Qt 5.x Documentation

2014-03-13 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Tuesday 11 March 2014 09:22:40 Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em ter 11 mar 2014, às 17:17:46, Andre Somers escreveu: > > I seriously don't see the benefit of this "harmonization". When I look > > at the docs for a class, I often just look for method names that seem to > > do what I need. That usually

Re: [Development] Q_WS_* used in Qt sources

2014-03-13 Thread Martin Koller
On Thursday 13 March 2014 10:57:38 Paul Olav Tvete wrote: > On Wednesday 12 March 2014 10:57:19 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Em qua 12 mar 2014, às 18:46:15, Martin Koller escreveu: > > > For me the code porting looks a bit "unfinished" due to this Q_WS > > > artefacts, so I just fear that problems a

Re: [Development] Current problems in CI

2014-03-13 Thread Knoll Lars
On 13/03/14 21:14, "John Layt" wrote: >On 13 March 2014 18:21, John Layt wrote: >> On 13 March 2014 18:08, Frederik Gladhorn >>wrote: >>> Looks like we're somewhat back on track. We got a first run for qtbase >>>passing >>> and hopefully start getting the backlog down. Thanks for bearing with >

Re: [Development] Current problems in CI

2014-03-13 Thread John Layt
On 13 March 2014 18:21, John Layt wrote: > On 13 March 2014 18:08, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: >> Looks like we're somewhat back on track. We got a first run for qtbase >> passing >> and hopefully start getting the backlog down. Thanks for bearing with us, >> there were quite a few things comming t

Re: [Development] Current problems in CI

2014-03-13 Thread John Layt
On 13 March 2014 18:08, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > Torsdag 13. mars 2014 16.32.22 skrev John Layt: >> On 13 March 2014 10:06, Sarajärvi Tony wrote: >> > Hi >> > >> > No ETA. There are quite a few problems in the autotest side. Just a minute >> > ago the last try failed. Have to fix more... >> > >

Re: [Development] Current problems in CI

2014-03-13 Thread Frederik Gladhorn
Torsdag 13. mars 2014 16.32.22 skrev John Layt: > On 13 March 2014 10:06, Sarajärvi Tony wrote: > > Hi > > > > No ETA. There are quite a few problems in the autotest side. Just a minute > > ago the last try failed. Have to fix more... > > > > -Tony > > Thanks Tony. I guess we won't have it bac

Re: [Development] Current problems in CI

2014-03-13 Thread John Layt
On 13 March 2014 10:06, Sarajärvi Tony wrote: > Hi > > No ETA. There are quite a few problems in the autotest side. Just a minute > ago the last try failed. Have to fix more... > > -Tony Thanks Tony. I guess we won't have it back now before Friday? Just getting a little concerned my printing c

Re: [Development] Harmonizing the Qt 5.x Documentation

2014-03-13 Thread Vladimir Minenko
On 12.03.14 10:37, "Pasion Jerome" wrote: >1) The 5.0 and 5.1 documentation are already in the archives: >http://doc.qt.digia.com/qt-5.0/qtdoc/index.html >http://doc.qt.digia.com/qt-5.1/qtdoc/index.html >The links to them will be published soon (around the time the redirects >will be in place) her

Re: [Development] Google Chrome Aura overlaps with Qt abstractions?

2014-03-13 Thread Simon Hausmann
On Thursday 13. March 2014 18.19.15 Mandeep Sandhu wrote: > I'm confusedthe Aura page states: > > "The goal is to produce a new desktop window manager and shell > environment with modern capabilities." > > Are they making a KDE/GNOME equivalent or is this a new UI toolkit i.e > a Qt/Gtk equiv

Re: [Development] Google Chrome Aura overlaps with Qt abstractions?

2014-03-13 Thread Robert Knight
This is UI toolkit plus windowing abstraction layer as I understand it. Converting Chrome terminology to Qt: 'Views' => Qt widgets (QPushButton etc.) 'Aura' => The foundations of QWidget (event routing, alien widgets, the backing store, QPlatform* classes) 'Ash' => A window manager. The front-end

Re: [Development] Google Chrome Aura overlaps with Qt abstractions?

2014-03-13 Thread Mandeep Sandhu
I'm confusedthe Aura page states: "The goal is to produce a new desktop window manager and shell environment with modern capabilities." Are they making a KDE/GNOME equivalent or is this a new UI toolkit i.e a Qt/Gtk equivalent? I thought it was the laterbut the statement above sounds a l

[Development] Google Chrome Aura overlaps with Qt abstractions?

2014-03-13 Thread Jaroslaw Staniek
Hi, Google Chrome launches the Aura graphics stack on Linux in M35. Popular note is that Google would have better check existing options such as Qt. There's an interesting remark, perhaps someone cares to share thoughts? "Aura is a lot more than a UI toolkit. it provides a unified composting laye

Re: [Development] First Qt 5.3 Beta snapshots available

2014-03-13 Thread Heikkinen Jani
Hi all, There is now better set of installers available in http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.3/5.3.0-beta/2014-03-13_9/ . Content is same than yesterday but now there is installers also for mac & most of windows ones as well. Br, Jani From: Heikkinen Jani Sent: 12. maaliskuuta 201

Re: [Development] Q_WS_* used in Qt sources

2014-03-13 Thread Paul Olav Tvete
On Wednesday 12 March 2014 10:57:19 Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em qua 12 mar 2014, às 18:46:15, Martin Koller escreveu: > > For me the code porting looks a bit "unfinished" due to this Q_WS > > artefacts, so I just fear that problems arise. > > It's possible. Yes, there are still probably some regr