On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Pau Garcia i Quiles
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>
>> I wrote some C++ classes 1.5-2 years ago for some of the following
>> features:
>>
>> * GPIO
>> * Eeprom
>> * Power management
>> * LED
>> * Hardware Monitoring
>> * DMA
>>
On 16/02/2014 9:46 AM, "Pau Garcia i Quiles" wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>
>> I wrote some C++ classes 1.5-2 years ago for some of the following
features:
>>
>> * GPIO
>> * Eeprom
>> * Power management
>> * LED
>> * Hardware Monitoring
>> * DMA
>> * Real T
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
I wrote some C++ classes 1.5-2 years ago for some of the following features:
>
> * GPIO
> * Eeprom
> * Power management
> * LED
> * Hardware Monitoring
> * DMA
> * Real Time Clock
> * I2C
> * SPI
> * etc.
>
> Out of curiosity: is there anyone wo
On 15 févr. 2014, at 21:05, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wrote some C++ classes 1.5-2 years ago for some of the following features:
>
> * GPIO
> * Eeprom
> * Power management
> * LED
> * Hardware Monitoring
> * DMA
> * Real Time Clock
> * I2C
> * SPI
> * etc.
>
> Out of curiosity: is there
Hi,
we were asked to make the udev symbol resolution possible in
QtSerialPort for the Qt 5 releases. It had been done. Unfortunately it
has been causing a crash for Qt 4. I cannot for my life pin the issue
down to the root cause.
Any help warmly appreciated. I think it is not nice that we have a
Hi,
I wrote some C++ classes 1.5-2 years ago for some of the following features:
* GPIO
* Eeprom
* Power management
* LED
* Hardware Monitoring
* DMA
* Real Time Clock
* I2C
* SPI
* etc.
Out of curiosity: is there anyone working on such classes in Qt? Would
such features be welcome in Qt in gene
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 7:49 PM, Kurt Pattyn wrote:
>
> On 15 Feb 2014, at 20:38, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>
>> I have not read this thread through, but it is long for me now, but I
>> would like to note one suggestion from my side:
>>
>> Make 1-2 unstable releases or a new add-on module. Unfortunately
On 15 Feb 2014, at 20:38, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> I have not read this thread through, but it is long for me now, but I
> would like to note one suggestion from my side:
>
> Make 1-2 unstable releases or a new add-on module. Unfortunately, we
> have not done that, and we are now stuck with a coupl
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:03 AM, Ulf Hermann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> as I just got bitten by it (see
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,78128) I'd really like to
> clarify our rules for including private headers in Qt.
> http://qt-project.org/wiki/Coding-Conventions#32bc73e08b315a2d85bfd10b2
I have not read this thread through, but it is long for me now, but I
would like to note one suggestion from my side:
Make 1-2 unstable releases or a new add-on module. Unfortunately, we
have not done that, and we are now stuck with a couple of bad API
issues for a few years. This could have been
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Björn Breitmeyer
wrote:
> No bad idea, 2008 is the last version supporting anything older than the new
> WEC2013 which we don't support yet, so its not likely to drop in the comming
> years without dropping CE support too.
Surprsingly enough (at least for me), ther
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Pau Garcia i Quiles
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Joshua Kolden
> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to add my vote and reiterate this as a valid target for Qt.
>> Consoles are becoming media centers, and a new discreet type of 'device'
>> just like a tablet o
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:29 AM, Kevin Krammer wrote:
> On Friday, 2014-01-17, 11:15:24, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Kevin Krammer
> wrote:
>> > On Friday, 2014-01-17, 10:52:29, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>> >> Wouldn't it be useful to get a proper 3D module in place first?
>
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Knoll Lars wrote:
>
>
> On 10/02/14 08:52, "Thiago Macieira" wrote:
>
>>Em seg 10 fev 2014, às 11:45:31, Denis Shienkov escreveu:
>>> > Yes, profile it and let us know where the exact problem is.
>>>
>>> Ok, thanks. I will try do it as will have a free time.
>>
>
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Sylvain THIBAUT
wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
>> The project is far from dead. We are hacking on it right now, but given how
>> much we want to change from Qt3D 1 we have been working on it in private.
>> However, we are now about to begin upstreaming it to a non-CI controlle
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Robin Burchell wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> After some build system reworking recently and a little discussion
> amongst the interested parties (Matt Vogt, Valerio), I'd like to
> propose renaming QMF (Qt Messaging Framework) to QtMail with the
> longer term goal of m
Fredag 14. februar 2014 19.01.05 skrev Kurt Pattyn:
> Hi,
>
> since QtWebSockets moved from the playground, the unit tests are not run
> anymore. Any idea where I can file this problem (which project in Jira)?
jira -> Qt Quality Assurance Infrastructure and I'm not 100% sure about which
componen
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em sex 14 fev 2014, às 15:59:28, Mandeep Sandhu escreveu:
> > I have a need for defining an integer constant that'll be used for
> > initializing a member variable of a private class.
> >
> > The Qt coding conventions (http://qt-project.o
18 matches
Mail list logo
