Hello
Do we have potential dates for QCS this year? I'm being asked to fill in my
Q2-2014 travel already...
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
___
Development mailing list
Dev
On Monday 10 February 2014 07:58:06 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em seg 10 fev 2014, às 16:27:56, Joerg Bornemann escreveu:
> > On 10-Feb-14 15:23, Joerg Bornemann wrote:
> > > Looks like __typeof__, which is used when building with a recent gcc,
> > > behaves differently when passing a c'tor?
> >
> >
Hi,
since QtWebSockets moved from the playground, the unit tests are not run
anymore.
Any idea where I can file this problem (which project in Jira)?
Cheers,
Kurt
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mail
> >
> > The Qt coding conventions
> > (http://qt-project.org/wiki/Coding-Conventions)
> > recommend using an enum over 'const int'.
> >
> > The rationale given there is that an enum will be replaced at
> > compile-time resulting in 'faster code'. Won't that be the case with
> > 'const int' as well?
On 2014-02-14 07:12, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> On 13 February 2014 18:52, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
>>> Why does the Qt5 QRegExp documentation not mention QRegularExpression?
>
> Because it's an oversight, I guess... patches for the docs are more
> than welcome! :)
Naturally :-). Comments like the a
Em sex 14 fev 2014, às 11:03:02, Ulf Hermann escreveu:
> If you need to include private headers there are four cases with
> different syntax. Various build system magic makes those possible but
> that will not be discussed here.
>
> 1. The header, e.g. whatever_p.h, is in the same directory as t
Em sex 14 fev 2014, às 15:59:28, Mandeep Sandhu escreveu:
> I have a need for defining an integer constant that'll be used for
> initializing a member variable of a private class.
>
> The Qt coding conventions (http://qt-project.org/wiki/Coding-Conventions)
> recommend using an enum over 'const in
On Wednesday 12 February 2014, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Em qua 12 fev 2014, às 09:55:09, Jason H escreveu:
> > Well Qt does NOT support grayscale. None of the QImage::Formats are gray.
> > It's either mono, indexed color or color bits. Which is why I'm a but
> > unsure of what is faster. I would as
Fredag 14. februar 2014 11.03.02 skrev Ulf Hermann:
> Hello,
>
> as I just got bitten by it (see
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,78128) I'd really like to
> clarify our rules for including private headers in Qt.
> http://qt-project.org/wiki/Coding-Conventions#32bc73e08b315a2d85bfd10b2e
Hi,
qmake for ios is a bit strange, in the sense that it treats device and
simulator as two build versions.
This is like debug and release, setting it in CONFIG sets the default used in
Makefile, but it also still generates specific makefiles for each possible
combination (iphoneos debug/relas
Hi,
qmake for ios is a bit strange, in the sense that it treats device and
simulator as two build versions.
This is like debug and release, setting it in CONFIG sets the default used in
Makefile, but it also still generates specific makefiles for each possible
combination (iphoneos debug/relas
Hi! Is there a way to build Qt 5's Webkit without MacroAssembler support?
The problem arises on some archs we have in Debian (for example, you can take
a look at s390x's [0] or powerpc's [1] build logs).
In case there is but rquiring a patch, would it be possible to add either an
option or a en
FYI we now have QTBUG-27872 for this. Besides getting more optimal shader code,
this is also extremely useful for translating our shaders on-the-fly to a more
modern GLSL syntax, when necessary, avoiding code duplication.
Best regards,
Laszlo
-Original Message-
From: development-bounces
On 14/02/14 03:03, "Christian Gagneraud" wrote:
>On 07/02/14 20:11, Heikkinen Jani wrote:
>> Hash mismatch was because qt5.2.1 content was replicating to the
>>mirrors at that time.
>
>Hi Jani,
>
>There's still some problems with the windows online installer, being in
>New Zealand, I'm redirect
On 13 February 2014 18:52, Matthew Woehlke
wrote:
>> Why does the Qt5 QRegExp documentation not mention QRegularExpression?
Because it's an oversight, I guess... patches for the docs are more
than welcome! :)
(The big picture is that QRegularExpression is not a 1:1 drop in
replacement for QRegEx
I agree with you if the constant represents some sort of 'range' (like the
error code ex you gave). But what about single value constants like a 'max
of something'? Won't a const be a better fit here rather having an enum
with just 1 entry?
-mandeep
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Blasche Alex
Hi.
An enum has the advantage that you have a certain level of type safety and in
my opinion it makes the API much more readable.
foo(int x)
is far less certain on what to pass then
foo(ErrorCode x)
I immediately see what the range of possible values is (based on the enum
definition) while t
I have a need for defining an integer constant that'll be used for
initializing a member variable of a private class.
The Qt coding conventions (http://qt-project.org/wiki/Coding-Conventions)
recommend using an enum over 'const int'.
The rationale given there is that an enum will be replaced at c
Hello,
as I just got bitten by it (see
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,78128) I'd really like to
clarify our rules for including private headers in Qt.
http://qt-project.org/wiki/Coding-Conventions#32bc73e08b315a2d85bfd10b2e8c867a
has a few notes on that but they're not very conclusi
Hi,
I'm using QT-5.1.1.
I'm trying to run a video with a large size (600Mb but we have only 400Mb),
- Using http protocol, the video starts to play and then I'm getting the
following failures:
sometimes
"terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc'
what(): std::bad_alloc
20 matches
Mail list logo
