Interesting for our compositor as well as the EGLFS, DirectFB and other of our
plugins?
-- Forwarded message --
Subject: libinput repository created
Date: terça-feira, 28 de janeiro de 2014, 13:48:49
From: Peter Hutterer
Para: wayland-de...@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Jonas Ådah
> Dropping support for 10.6, and making it possible to clean up that code,
> would in the mid-term free up resources that would make
> it possible to spend more resources on better OS X integration in general
> (or, would make the existing resources more efficient in doing so)?
That was the impl
> I'm guessing it has something with the unified title and toolbar on mac fix?
I’d also loot at that direction, however I just can’t believe such a fix may
remove 60MB of the library code :>
--
Adam
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.
On segunda-feira, 27 de janeiro de 2014 11:25:17, Konrad Rosenbaum wrote:
> Neither do I, but as a user of Qt I've inadvertently tricked myself often
> enough with additional trailing spaces (please highlight those as well!),
Trailing spaces is a compelling argument for wrapping the full string
> On Jan 26, 2014, at 8:10 PM, Robert Knight wrote:
>
>>> In regards to users of Mac OS Qt applications: I’m am extremely confident
>>> that more Mac OS applications would be/have been written in Qt,
>>> if the priority for native looking widget support was higher. Mac OS users
>>> are notorio
On Monday, Monday 27 January 2014 at 09:06, Knoll Lars wrote:
> >With my change as it is, you'd see:
> >Actual (s1): Thiago Jos\u00E9 Macieira / Lars Knoll
> >Expected (s2): Thiago Jose\u0301 Macieira \u2215 L\u0430rs Knoll
>
> I know that, but we’re usually not writing our auto tests to try and
On Sunday, Sunday 26 January 2014 at 23:46, Richard Moore wrote:
> The aim of the masking is to prevent request splitting and smuggling
> attacks when going through proxies. It prevents an application from
> being to trick proxies into beginning a new request that does
> something different to the
On Jan 26, 2014, at 8:10 PM, Robert Knight wrote:
>> In regards to users of Mac OS Qt applications: I’m am extremely confident
>> that more Mac OS applications would be/have been written in Qt,
>> if the priority for native looking widget support was higher. Mac OS users
>> are notorious for t
On segunda-feira, 27 de janeiro de 2014 08:06:58, Knoll Lars wrote:
> >With my change as it is, you'd see:
> >Actual (s1): Thiago Jos\u00E9 Macieira / Lars Knoll
> >Expected (s2): Thiago Jose\u0301 Macieira \u2215 L\u0430rs Knoll
>
> I know that, but we’re usually not writing our auto tests to t
On 27/01/14 00:03, "Thiago Macieira" wrote:
>On domingo, 26 de janeiro de 2014 20:17:20, Knoll Lars wrote:
>> I usually prefer the output in utf8, as it gives readable strings (at
>> least on Mac and Linux as long as you don¹t mess with the locale).
>>Escaped
>> strings are much more tedious to
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org
[...]
> 2. When sending data from client to server (not the other way) The client
> generates a 32-bit random number.
> This random number is stored in plain text in the header of each frame.
> The data is
11 matches
Mail list logo
