Hi Simo, Guys.
Many thanks for your involvement.
> You can use this https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTQAINFRA-682
I added there some instruction for "com0com" installation. So, what
additional info still it is necessary for you?
Best regards,
Denis
2014/1/23 Fält Simo
>
>
> >
On Jan 22, 2014, at 8:31 PM, Cristian Adam wrote:
> On 22.01.2014 19:35, ext Olivier Goffart wrote:
>> Regarding the use of libclang for the code model in Qt creator, there
>> was no progress in a long time.
>
> I think the clang code model branch has been merged into master:
> http://lists.q
On quinta-feira, 23 de janeiro de 2014 07:37:14, Knoll Lars wrote:
> On 23/01/14 00:32, "Thiago Macieira" wrote:
> >However, knowing Valerio from the past, I would be ok with giving him
> >approver
> >rights throughout.
>
> +1 (including the last sentence).
Ok, so Valerio is now on the regular 3
On 23/01/14 00:32, "Thiago Macieira" wrote:
>On quarta-feira, 22 de janeiro de 2014 22:50:49, Robin Burchell wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'd like to propose Approver rights for Valerio on messaging framework.
>>
>> Justification: Valerio has worked on (& with) QMF for a long time, on
>> both the Nok
> -Original Message-
> From: Gladhorn Frederik
> Sent: 22. tammikuuta 2014 22:19
> To: Denis Shienkov; development@qt-project.org
> Cc: Sarajärvi Tony; Fält Simo
> Subject: RE: [Development] [QtSerialPort] Add some set of base auto tests
>
> On Wednesday 22. January 2014 22.06.03 Denis S
On 23 Jan 2014, at 03:49, Joshua Kolden wrote:
> Upon further experimentation I find that turning layer.mipmap on and off, has
> no effect. While smooth on a layer vs. smooth on the image does effect the
> image differently.
This is strange. I see a big difference here when I scale down an i
Upon further experimentation I find that turning layer.mipmap on and off, has
no effect. While smooth on a layer vs. smooth on the image does effect the
image differently. This makes sense if one is being filtered against the
original image size and the other against the Item’s layer texture s
On quarta-feira, 22 de janeiro de 2014 22:50:49, Robin Burchell wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to propose Approver rights for Valerio on messaging framework.
>
> Justification: Valerio has worked on (& with) QMF for a long time, on
> both the Nokia N9 and now with us at Jolla on QMF-on-Sailfish. QM
Hello,
I'd like to propose Approver rights for Valerio on messaging framework.
Justification: Valerio has worked on (& with) QMF for a long time, on
both the Nokia N9 and now with us at Jolla on QMF-on-Sailfish. QMF
also doesn't exactly have an abundance of approvers, so especially now
that I'm d
Qt3D looks appetizing for my next project, but I'm not having much luck
with finding out what's going on.
So I thought I'd ask.
Following instruction on http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt3D-Installation
(for Windows/MinGW) gives you a Qt3D that builds OK but doesn't even run
it's own tutorial examp
On Wednesday 22. January 2014 22.06.03 Denis Shienkov wrote:
> > As mentioned on Gerrit before, I was discussing it with Simo, but the
> > problem is really that we neither had anything integrated, nor
> > instructions how to set it up... Those are necessary to get done
> > before requesting an
On 22.01.2014 19:35, ext Olivier Goffart wrote:
> Regarding the use of libclang for the code model in Qt creator, there
> was no progress in a long time.
I think the clang code model branch has been merged into master:
http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/qt-creator/2013-December/003028.html
T
On quarta-feira, 22 de janeiro de 2014 19:35:42, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> You mean "code model" not "memory model".
And you meant to post to the qt-crea...@qt-project.org mailing list.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source T
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 12:11 AM, Fabien Castan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Qt 5.2 adds the possibility to use drag&drop from/to external applications.
> To allows to drag an item from QML to an external application, we can't
> simply set a target item, because we want to see this item ouside of the qml
> wi
On Wednesday 22 January 2014 12:14:46 Chris L wrote:
> There are many people out there that want to use Qt Creator not just for Qt
> applications but also for general c++ cross platform development as
> well.When you look at the options available in this area there are only a
> few with the feature
There are many people out there that want to use Qt Creator not just for Qt
applications but also for general c++ cross platform development as well.When
you look at the options available in this area there are only a few with the
features set that Qt Creator has. Eclipse comes to mind.
Qt Cre
> As mentioned on Gerrit before, I was discussing it with Simo, but the
> problem is really that we neither had anything integrated, nor
> instructions how to set it up... Those are necessary to get done
> before requesting any further steps on the CI side.
The short instruction how to setup
On quarta-feira, 22 de janeiro de 2014 09:26:57, Blasche Alexander wrote:
> It's the first time that I had to provide a changes file for my modules.
> Obviously I was a bit too ambitious ;) but yes:
>
> qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtconnectivity/blobs/release/dist/changes-5.2.1
Thanks Alex
I'll split t
Mandag 20. januar 2014 12.59.49 skrev Thiago Macieira:
> On segunda-feira, 20 de janeiro de 2014 12:39:04, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Accessibility
> > -
> >
> > - On Linux action names were returned as empty strings in AT-SPI
> >
> >getActions, now returns the proper names.
>
On Jan 22, 2014, at 3:32 PM, Tomasz Olszak wrote:
I noticed that there was no activity in this branch since end of
October. Is there any TODO list... what need to be done to merge it
with dev?
Indeed there hasn't been any activity. It currently contains what was started
by Ilay and Jim. I haven
> Ongoing porting effort is happening in the 'wip/gstreamer-1.0' branch.
>
> It most likely won't make it into Qt before 5.4.
I noticed that there was no activity in this branch since end of
October. Is there any TODO list... what need to be done to merge it
with dev?
--
regards,
Tomasz Olszak
_
Great, thanks for the effort.
/Kurt
On 22 Jan 2014, at 11:13, Oswald Buddenhagen
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 01:15:46PM +0100, Kurt Pattyn wrote:
>> The majority seems to agree that this should NOT go into the QtNetwork
>> module, but should be an add-on.
>>
> the repository was now move
On Jan 22, 2014, at 10:07 AM, Tomasz Olszak wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Is gstreamer 1.0 integration planned for 5.3?
>
Ongoing porting effort is happening in the 'wip/gstreamer-1.0' branch.
It most likely won't make it into Qt before 5.4.
Yoann Lopes
Senior Software Engineer - Digia, Qt
Visit us on: ht
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 01:15:46PM +0100, Kurt Pattyn wrote:
> The majority seems to agree that this should NOT go into the QtNetwork
> module, but should be an add-on.
>
the repository was now moved to qt/qtwebsockets.
- you need to adjust your git remotes (just edit .git/config)
- when you deem
On 17 January 2014 19:49, Kurt Pattyn wrote:
> So, based on the feedback, can everybody agree on QtWebSockets being an
> add-on?
> It keeps the core as is, and provides an opt-in for applications that need it.
+1 from me. I think it's a good addition to the framework.
Rich.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Kur
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+alexander.blasche=digia@qt-project.org
> [mailto:development-bounces+alexander.blasche=digia@qt-project.org]
> On Behalf Of Alan Ezust
> Exactly my point. Why does someone need superpowers in order to edit these
> tickets?
> Shouldn'
--
Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+alexander.blasche=digia@qt-project.org
> [mailto:development-bounces+alexander.blasche=digia@qt-project.org]
> On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira
> Sent: Tuesday, 21 January 2014 17:58
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject:
2013/10/23 Jim Hodapp :
> Hello,
>
> Based on Ilay’s work [1], I’ve further ported the QtMultimedia code to
> GStreamer 1.0 and have added support for rendering on the new Ubuntu Touch
> platform. Right now, this will render to SurfaceFlinger or Mir. I’d like to
> work to get this QtMultimedia port
Interesting. I tried the layer.mipmap previously with no effect, I did’t catch
that one needed to “enable” it too. However, I just tried this, and although
it created a different, marginally smoother result is is still very noticeably
aliasing.
Here is a move of that test:
http://c4.dev.s3
On Jan 21, 2014, at 2:56 PM, Tor Arne Vestbø wrote:
> On 21/01/14 13:36 , Sorvig Morten wrote:
>> I realize that if I’m the only one who want’s to keep supporting 10.6
>> then that’s not going to work. The most important thing to me is to
>> have a somewhat predictable deprecation plan. For exam
30 matches
Mail list logo
