On Jan 21, 2014, at 3:15 PM, Sorvig Morten wrote:
> On 20 Jan 2014, at 21:21, deDietrich Gabriel
> wrote:
>> The truth is, market share doesn’t mean anything. Point in case: According
>> to the link above, OS X is less than 8% of the total market share. Should we
>> then drop the Mac port co
On Jan 21, 2014, at 3:01 PM, Mohamed Fawzi wrote:
>
> On 21 Jan 2014, at 14:25, Jake Petroules
> wrote:
>
>> On Jan 21, 2014, at 7:36 AM, Sorvig Morten wrote:
>>
>>> On 21 Jan 2014, at 11:51, Simon Hausmann wrote:
>>>
>>> That depends on how much time we spend releasing Qt :)
>>>
>>> I
This is the expceted result. smooth: true uses bilinear filtering which is what
is supported in hardware. When scaling down, this starts to degrade. The effect
is drastic for high-contrast content like the edges of a font. Once go get
below 0.5x scale factor the sampling starts to ignore pixels
Yes, it also has no effect.
On Jan 21, 2014, at 11:21 PM, Rutledge Shawn wrote:
>
> On 22 Jan 2014, at 4:03 AM, Joshua Kolden wrote:
>
>> Image {
>> id: c4CameraImage
>> fillMode: Image.PreserveAspectFit
>> source: “path/to/c4camera.png"
>> anchors.left: parent.left
>> anchors.top:
On 22 Jan 2014, at 4:03 AM, Joshua Kolden wrote:
> Image {
>id: c4CameraImage
>fillMode: Image.PreserveAspectFit
>source: “path/to/c4camera.png"
>anchors.left: parent.left
>anchors.top: parent.top
>anchors.bottom: parent.bottom
>smooth : true
Did you try antialiasing:
I’m getting boxed in with rendering bugs on two fronts. Originally I tried to
work with fonts for the following animation, but have both render quality and
font ‘subfamily’ selection bugs to deal with there. So I took the effort to
switch a lot of stuff around and use images instead, however I’
On terça-feira, 21 de janeiro de 2014 17:39:07, Chris L wrote:
> With clang getting complete draft c++14 support, is the memory model
> sufficient to move to using it by default? Things like unique_ptr and
> vector really need this.
What do you mean? We've been officially depending on the C++11 m
x27;t relevant for the changelog.
> >
> > The release branch of the git repo for this module has had the relevant fix
> > for the above issue for some time.
>
> You mean in the changes file?
>
> --
> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
> Softwa
Hi,
Qt 5.2 adds the possibility to use drag&drop from/to external applications.
To allows to drag an item from QML to an external application, we can't
simply set a target item, because we want to see this item ouside of the
qml window.
In Qt, we could set a pixmap on drag events:
http://qt-projec
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Alberto Mardegan
wrote:
> On 01/15/2014 10:48 PM, Alan Alpert wrote:
>> This approach could also apply to the original suggestion by Alberto,
>> in the absence of a separate add on module (which Sean couldn't use
>> because of the QtQuick.Controls dependency). Jus
On 21 janv. 2014, at 14:25, Jake Petroules wrote:
> On Jan 21, 2014, at 7:36 AM, Sorvig Morten wrote:
>
>> On 21 Jan 2014, at 11:51, Simon Hausmann wrote:
>>
>> That depends on how much time we spend releasing Qt :)
>>
>> I realize that if I’m the only one who want’s to keep supporting 10.
On 21 janv. 2014, at 00:43, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 20 de janeiro de 2014 23:58:21, Samuel Gaist wrote:
>> On 20 janv. 2014, at 23:44, Thiago Macieira
> wrote:
>>> On segunda-feira, 20 de janeiro de 2014 22:59:09, Samuel Gaist wrote:
Yes it does, with that, QLocale supp
On terça-feira, 21 de janeiro de 2014 13:31:40, Matt Broadstone wrote:
> I think this would be great as well, but also if there was maybe an io
> manipulator to print the hex if you want to look at that as well. Ideally
> such a manipulator would print the whole hex, currently the hex printed for
>
On Tuesday 21 January 2014, Sorvig Morten wrote:
> Obviously it’s not going to stand forever, especially when seeing the
> strong opinions from the Qt on Mac developers. We are moving in the
> direction of not supporting 10.6. The 5.3 binary packages will not support
> it. QtWebkit lives its own li
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> I was writing a test today and QtTest told me:
>
>Actual (s) : ?12???
>Expected (s2): ?12???
>
> So I went, "duh, ok, it looks the same to me but what's behind those
> question
> marks".
>
> After a bit of changes [https://coderev
Exactly my point. Why does someone need superpowers in order to edit these
tickets?
Shouldn't it be possible for developers to reorganize or close or add info
to these things?
It doesn't serve any purpose to keep them open and frozen like this.
Anyway, I am requesting said superpowers so I can hel
On terça-feira, 21 de janeiro de 2014 08:09:43, Blasche Alexander wrote:
> Why are you pushing change log items for modules outside of qtbase to
> qtbase?
>
> http://qt-project.org/wiki/Change-files-in-Qt-5.2
>
> clearly accumulates the various files from the various git repos.
I'm editing every
Hi,
Running some html5 tests, I'm getting the following error:
GStreamer-ERROR **: gstbuffer.c:542: failed to allocate 38707983 bytes
Debugging the issue, I see that we are trying to allocate a 38707983
bytes in "StreamingClient::didReceiveData(ResourceHandle* handle,
const char* data, int len
On 21 Jan 2014, at 13:20, Tor Arne Vestbø wrote:
>
>
> On 21/01/14 11:23 , Sorvig Morten wrote:
>> I agree with many of these arguments, and I was in favor of setting
>> the minimum supported version to 10.7 back when we started Qt 5
>> development. But we did make the decision to support 10.6
On 20 Jan 2014, at 21:21, deDietrich Gabriel
wrote:
> The truth is, market share doesn’t mean anything. Point in case: According to
> the link above, OS X is less than 8% of the total market share. Should we
> then drop the Mac port completely?
Good question! Possible arguments for not discont
On 21 Jan 2014, at 14:25, Jake Petroules
mailto:jake.petrou...@petroules.com>>
wrote:
On Jan 21, 2014, at 7:36 AM, Sorvig Morten
mailto:morten.sor...@digia.com>> wrote:
On 21 Jan 2014, at 11:51, Simon Hausmann
mailto:simon.hausm...@digia.com>> wrote:
That depends on how much time we spend r
On 21/01/14 13:36 , Sorvig Morten wrote:
> I realize that if I’m the only one who want’s to keep supporting 10.6
> then that’s not going to work. The most important thing to me is to
> have a somewhat predictable deprecation plan. For example (and at the
> risk of making this example “the plan”):
>
On Jan 21, 2014, at 7:36 AM, Sorvig Morten wrote:
> On 21 Jan 2014, at 11:51, Simon Hausmann wrote:
>
> That depends on how much time we spend releasing Qt :)
>
> I realize that if I’m the only one who want’s to keep supporting 10.6 then
> that’s not going to work. The most important thing t
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-35702
On 01/21/2014 09:54 AM, Fabien Castan wrote:
> Hi,
> I get some troubles in building Qt by myself... (errors with pch files).
> Could someone with a debug version of qmlscene try to open the external
> drag&drop example ?
>
> qmlscene
> qt5/qtde
hi all,
I have found some bugs related to snowshoe browser, actually qtwebkit2, and
qtwebkitengine.
So i want to know where to fill them as bugs.webkit.org seems to be no
more suitable.
regards
haithem
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-proje
On 21 Jan 2014, at 11:51, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 21. January 2014 10.23.22 Sorvig Morten wrote:
>> On 21 Jan 2014, at 09:32, Simon Hausmann wrote:
>>> On Monday 20. January 2014 20.21.14 deDietrich Gabriel wrote:
On Jan 20, 2014, at 7:55 PM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
> wrote:
>>>
On 20/01/14 21:21 , deDietrich Gabriel wrote:
[snip]
> I only work on my little things, and 10.6 is a burden for me. So, you
> who work out there, that see people using Qt 5 apps, tell me, is it
> worth it?
I'm 100% with Gabriel here.
- The 20% marked share doesn't mean anything without details
On 21/01/14 11:23 , Sorvig Morten wrote:
> I agree with many of these arguments, and I was in favor of setting
> the minimum supported version to 10.7 back when we started Qt 5
> development. But we did make the decision to support 10.6. The
> implementation effort has been made and that decision
On Tuesday 21. January 2014 09.32.45 Simon Hausmann wrote:
[...]
> I personally like the suggestion brought up elsewhere of keeping things as
> they are for Qt 5.3 and dropping 10.6 from the CI system and supported
> platforms for 5.3 - while simultaneously reviewing and approving patches by
> othe
On Tuesday 21. January 2014 10.23.22 Sorvig Morten wrote:
> On 21 Jan 2014, at 09:32, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > On Monday 20. January 2014 20.21.14 deDietrich Gabriel wrote:
> >> On Jan 20, 2014, at 7:55 PM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen
wrote:
> >>> On Monday 20 January 2014, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> >
On 21 Jan 2014, at 09:32, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> On Monday 20. January 2014 20.21.14 deDietrich Gabriel wrote:
>> On Jan 20, 2014, at 7:55 PM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
>>> On Monday 20 January 2014, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On segunda-feira, 20 de janeiro de 2014 17:36:26, Kurt Pattyn w
All,
Newbie to Qt development and it's usages. Need some help to KICK START Qt
usages.
I am using Linux desktop platform. I have following futures to implement -
1. A GUI to accept some inputs through multiple buttons.
2. Above values should be taken either as INPUT or LIMIT set for any data
or
Hi,
I get some troubles in building Qt by myself... (errors with pch files).
Could someone with a debug version of qmlscene try to open the external
drag&drop example ?
qmlscene qt5/qtdeclarative/examples/quick/externaldraganddrop/
externaldraganddrop.qml
It's reproductible. Just try to drag the
On 20.01.2014 21:59, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> - QProcess:
>> * [QTBUG-35357] Fixed a regression from Qt4 in QProcess that
>> prevented altering the pipe modes of stdin in the child process.
>
> I've rewritten this text. Please confirm that it is accurate.
I hereby confirm the accurac
On Monday 20. January 2014 20.21.14 deDietrich Gabriel wrote:
> On Jan 20, 2014, at 7:55 PM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote:
> > On Monday 20 January 2014, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> >> On segunda-feira, 20 de janeiro de 2014 17:36:26, Kurt Pattyn wrote:
> >>> The CI system is still building for OSX 10
--
Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+alexander.blasche=digia@qt-project.org
> [mailto:development-bounces+alexander.blasche=digia@qt-project.org]
> On Behalf Of Alan Ezust
> Sent: Monday, 20 January 2014 23:33
> To: deDietrich Gabriel
> Cc: development@qt-pro
On 21 Jan 2014, at 8:01 AM, Sarajärvi Tony wrote:
> You are talking about dropping 10.6 support, whereas we are dropping 10.7 as
> well from the CI.
> I know support and CI aren't the same thing, but you might want to object our
> plan which as of now hasn't received any criticism.
I'm surprise
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+alexander.blasche=digia@qt-project.org
> [mailto:development-bounces+alexander.blasche=digia@qt-project.org]
> On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira
> Here's the edited changelog. Please re-read it. You can also find it here:
> https://
38 matches
Mail list logo
