Re: [Development] QtQml maintainer nomination

2014-01-09 Thread Alan Alpert
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Knoll Lars wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to continue on filling gaps in our maintainer list and thus want > to propose Simon Hausmann as the new maintainer for QtQml. Guess I don't > need to say a whole lot more about the nomination... ;-) +1 from me. Aside from his

Re: [Development] QtQml maintainer nomination

2014-01-09 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 9 de janeiro de 2014 20:24:47, Knoll Lars wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to continue on filling gaps in our maintainer list and thus want > to propose Simon Hausmann as the new maintainer for QtQml. Guess I don't > need to say a whole lot more about the nomination... ;-) No need for t

[Development] QtQml maintainer nomination

2014-01-09 Thread Knoll Lars
Hi, I'd like to continue on filling gaps in our maintainer list and thus want to propose Simon Hausmann as the new maintainer for QtQml. Guess I don't need to say a whole lot more about the nomination... ;-) Cheers, Lars ___ Development mailing list De

Re: [Development] Let's get rid of qDebug/qWarning/qCritical!

2014-01-09 Thread Koehne Kai
>From: Poenitz Andre > >Koehne Kai wrote: >> On quinta-feira, 9 de janeiro de 2014 07:28:07, Koehne Kai wrote: >> > if qCWarning() would expand to an if (myCategory().isEnabled()) ... >> >> That's why it would have to expand to if (!myCategory().isEnabled()) {} else >> >> Well, we can't, since the

Re: [Development] Nominating people from our release team for approver rights

2014-01-09 Thread Frederik Gladhorn
Torsdag 9. januar 2014 14.18.56 skrev Knoll Lars: > Hi, > > I’d like to nominate a couple of people from the release team for approver > rights. They’ve been working for the last 14 month with our release and CI > infrastructure, and even though many of their contributions are not as > directly vi

[Development] Debugging into Qt binaries

2014-01-09 Thread Kuba Ober
I’m trying to figure out the most constructive way of ensuring that an OS X build of Qt, installed with the source code, can be actually debugged by stepping into the C++ source code in the Qt library. So far I can only step into disassembly. This doesn't work out of the box on a fresh install o

Re: [Development] Building Qt 5 with Visual Studio 2008

2014-01-09 Thread Fabio Dago
I get the source from git (git://gitorious.org/qt/qt5.git) Il 09/01/2014 17.24, Richard Gerd Kuesters ha scritto: You may find this quite awkward, but which Qt source are you using to compile? I have to ask you this because the zipped source code has differences compared to the xz and gzip

Re: [Development] Let's get rid of qDebug/qWarning/qCritical!

2014-01-09 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 9 de janeiro de 2014 16:29:10, Koehne Kai wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > > [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On > > Behalf Of Thiago Macieira > > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 20

Re: [Development] Let's get rid of qDebug/qWarning/qCritical!

2014-01-09 Thread Poenitz Andre
Koehne Kai wrote: > On quinta-feira, 9 de janeiro de 2014 07:28:07, Koehne Kai wrote: > > if qCWarning() would expand to an if (myCategory().isEnabled()) ... > > That's why it would have to expand to if (!myCategory().isEnabled()) {} else > > Well, we can't, since the << arguments are not part of

Re: [Development] Building Qt 5 with Visual Studio 2008

2014-01-09 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 9 de janeiro de 2014 17:17:16, Fabio Dago wrote: > Yes but as I said: > > > Instead, using SDK 7.0, there is the error of duplicate declaration > of SHARDAPPIDINFOLINK > > So I don't know what's the correct SDK to use. > > > Maybe I have to use SDK 7 and remove the

Re: [Development] Let's get rid of qDebug/qWarning/qCritical!

2014-01-09 Thread Koehne Kai
> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of Thiago Macieira > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 5:05 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] L

Re: [Development] Building Qt 5 with Visual Studio 2008

2014-01-09 Thread Friedemann Kleint
Hi, this issue is tracked by https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-35980 , it should be fixed soonish. Regards, Friedemann -- Friedemann Kleint Digia, Qt ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/m

Re: [Development] Building Qt 5 with Visual Studio 2008

2014-01-09 Thread Richard Gerd Kuesters
You may find this quite awkward, but which Qt source are you using to compile? I have to ask you this because the zipped source code has differences compared to the xz and gzip versions, which compiles on Windows. The xz and gzip versions doesn't. It took me a while to figure that out and

Re: [Development] Building Qt 5 with Visual Studio 2008

2014-01-09 Thread Fabio Dago
Il 09/01/2014 17.08, Thiago Macieira ha scritto: On quinta-feira, 9 de janeiro de 2014 15:40:46, Fabio Dago wrote: Runnning nmake I have this error using SDK 6.0A: qwinjumplistcategory.cpp .\qwinjumplistcategory.cpp(134) : error C2065: 'SHARD_APPIDINFOLINK': Is there an upgrade to that Windows

Re: [Development] Building Qt 5 with Visual Studio 2008

2014-01-09 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 9 de janeiro de 2014 15:40:46, Fabio Dago wrote: > Runnning nmake I have this error using SDK 6.0A: > > qwinjumplistcategory.cpp > .\qwinjumplistcategory.cpp(134) : error C2065: 'SHARD_APPIDINFOLINK': Is there an upgrade to that Windows SDK? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira

Re: [Development] Nominating people from our release team for approver rights

2014-01-09 Thread Simon Hausmann
On Thursday 9. January 2014 08.05.27 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quinta-feira, 9 de janeiro de 2014 14:18:56, Knoll Lars wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I’d like to nominate a couple of people from the release team for approver > > rights. They’ve been working for the last 14 month with our release and CI

Re: [Development] Let's get rid of qDebug/qWarning/qCritical!

2014-01-09 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 9 de janeiro de 2014 07:28:07, Koehne Kai wrote: > if qCWarning() would expand to an if (myCategory().isEnabled()) ... That's why it would have to expand to if (!myCategory().isEnabled()) {} else -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Ope

Re: [Development] Nominating people from our release team for approver rights

2014-01-09 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 9 de janeiro de 2014 14:18:56, Knoll Lars wrote: > Hi, > > I’d like to nominate a couple of people from the release team for approver > rights. They’ve been working for the last 14 month with our release and CI > infrastructure, and even though many of their contributions are not

[Development] Building Qt 5 with Visual Studio 2008

2014-01-09 Thread Fabio Dago
Hi all. I'm new int this mailing list, I need some help to build Qt 5. I have asked help int the qt-project forum, but someone said to ask here because the forum is more user oriented. I'm trying to build Qt 5 from git as explained in the qt-project.org guide, using Visual Studio 2008. The first

[Development] Nominating people from our release team for approver rights

2014-01-09 Thread Knoll Lars
Hi, I’d like to nominate a couple of people from the release team for approver rights. They’ve been working for the last 14 month with our release and CI infrastructure, and even though many of their contributions are not as directly visible (and often aren’t visible in gerrit), they are highly im

Re: [Development] QPlatformWindow customization with QWindow's dynamic properties

2014-01-09 Thread Tomasz Olszak
2014/1/9 Friedemann Kleint > Hi, > > just FYI, there also is : > > QVariant QPlatformNativeInterface::windowProperty(QPlatformWindow > *window, const QString &name) const; > void QPlatformNativeInterface::setWindowProperty(QPlatformWindow > *window, const QString &name, const QVariant &value); >