Re: [Development] 'register' not fully removed from Qt?

2013-12-25 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 25 de dezembro de 2013 17:45:13, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote: > return bswap_32(source); > > > So was 'register' reintroduced or not fully removed, or something else? Something else. bswap_32 is a macro. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - In

Re: [Development] Werror check for headers causing FTBFS in sparc (cast-align)

2013-12-25 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Wednesday 25 December 2013 14:28:56 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > On Wednesday 25 December 2013 11:38:17 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On quarta-feira, 25 de dezembro de 2013 02:13:26, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > We don't turn on -Wcast-align for ARM and apparently we shouldn't for

Re: [Development] Werror check for headers causing FTBFS in sparc (cast-align)

2013-12-25 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Wednesday 25 December 2013 11:38:17 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quarta-feira, 25 de dezembro de 2013 02:13:26, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > We don't turn on -Wcast-align for ARM and apparently we shouldn't for > > Sparc > > either. Just edit the .prf file and make sure we apply the same logic. >

[Development] 'register' not fully removed from Qt?

2013-12-25 Thread Jiergir Ogoerg
Hi, Judging by this: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,59022 the 'register' keyword has been removed from Qt, but I have a Qt 5.2 build from Dec 22 2013 on amd64 Linux and LLVM 3.4 issues a pile of warnings about the 'register' keyword in QtCore/qendian.h like this: In file included from

Re: [Development] Werror check for headers causing FTBFS in sparc (cast-align)

2013-12-25 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 25 de dezembro de 2013 02:13:26, Thiago Macieira wrote: > We don't turn on -Wcast-align for ARM and apparently we shouldn't for Sparc > either. Just edit the .prf file and make sure we apply the same logic. And submit the patch afterwards :-) -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira

Re: [Development] Proposal for allowing handling of HTTP redirects in QNAM

2013-12-25 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 25 de dezembro de 2013 13:24:43, Mandeep Sandhu wrote: > If this gets unnecessarily complex to be done from within the QNAM > framework, maybe we can have some sort of a 'wrapper' class handling > redirects using QNR's public APIs. We could possibly keep such a class > in the qt-so

Re: [Development] Werror check for headers causing FTBFS in sparc (cast-align)

2013-12-25 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 24 de dezembro de 2013 21:33:55, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Fixing this would be simple for me (distro-wide), just removing > qtsvg/tests/auto/headersclean/* before building the package, but I would > like to know if this kind of error is between the ones you wa

Re: [Development] Qt/Android Ministro Question

2013-12-25 Thread BogDan
Hi,   I just updated the Ministro repo. It should be visible in about 1 hour. Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! Cheers, BogDan. - Original Message - > From: Travis Allen > To: BogDan ; "development@qt-project.org" > > Cc: > Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 8:59 PM > Subject

Re: [Development] Qt/Android Ministro Question

2013-12-25 Thread BogDan
Hi,   Well, from your mail it looks like Ministro is a second class citizen deploying method which IMHO is not true at all. Bundling Qt libs into the apk is *one* of the official *ways*, meaning that Ministro is also *one* of the official *ways* ;-)! Every deploying method has advantages and di