On quinta-feira, 12 de dezembro de 2013 00:09:52, John Layt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm refactoring the CUPS printing code (more on that in another email)
> and noticed we don't currently have a minimum required version set,
> i.e. we're currently restricted to the 1.0 api released in 1999. CUPS
> is no
Hi,
I'm refactoring the CUPS printing code (more on that in another email)
and noticed we don't currently have a minimum required version set,
i.e. we're currently restricted to the 1.0 api released in 1999. CUPS
is now at 1.7. There's some nicer api I'd like to use from 1.2 and
1.4, so for Qt 5
On quarta-feira, 11 de dezembro de 2013 16:15:40, Milian Wolff wrote:
> what do I need to do in order to test coverage for the QWebChannel module
> enabled? There are so far a few QML tests and benchmarks. I plan to extend
> this further.
>
> Also, Gerrit does not seem to test-build patches that
On quarta-feira, 11 de dezembro de 2013 13:30:15, Friedemann Kleint wrote:
> The usual technique for fixing warnings is to push one change per
> warning type for easier review (for example, fix all signed/unsigned
> comparisons in one change).
If it's not obvious what the warning you're fixing i
On quarta-feira, 11 de dezembro de 2013 09:12:22, Knoll Lars wrote:
> Is this the right fix for 5.2? I'm a bit afraid that this would cause
> Linux distributions to install the sse disabled QtQml by default, leading
> to pretty bad performance.
I think so. Unless the distro specifically builds wit
Hey all,
what do I need to do in order to test coverage for the QWebChannel module
enabled? There are so far a few QML tests and benchmarks. I plan to extend
this further.
Also, Gerrit does not seem to test-build patches that I merge before
integration. How is that enabled?
Thanks
--
Milian
On Dec 11, 2013, at 11:57 AM, Jonathan Liu wrote:
> On 11/12/2013 8:03 PM, Ziller Eike wrote:
>> On Dec 11, 2013, at 6:27 AM, Jonathan Liu wrote:
>>
>>> On 10 December 2013 18:34, Koehne Kai wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-projec
On Wednesday 11 December 2013, Knoll Lars wrote:
> PS: Actually I think QtQml in 5.0 and 5.1 was also requiring SSE (because
> of V8).
>
If not then QtWebKit did. Support for x87 math in the interpreter was added
and a flag forcing sse math was removed in Qt 5.2.
There was a few bug reports from
Hi,
>I suppose that the warnings in the list beneath are still unsolved. Is
that correct?
>How critical is it to solve those warnings? If they are critical for
the release, I want to give a helping hand to remove them (after all
there are more than 900, the >list below is a synopsis).
The li
On 12/11/2013 11:25 AM, Ola Røer Thorsen wrote:
> I found a crash in the graph example that comes with 5.2, but found it's
> been reported already here
> https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-33080 since 5.1.1.
>
> It's assigned to "Qt Documentation Team" so maybe it has been overlooked
>
On 11/12/2013 09:03, Ziller Eike wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2013, at 6:27 AM, Jonathan Liu wrote:
>
>> On 10 December 2013 18:34, Koehne Kai wrote:
>>> Actually ANGLE (one of the OpenGL backends we have for Windows) doesn't
>>> support Windows XP already now, which is why e.g. Qt Creator 3.0 will not
On 11/12/2013 8:03 PM, Ziller Eike wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2013, at 6:27 AM, Jonathan Liu wrote:
>
>> On 10 December 2013 18:34, Koehne Kai wrote:
-Original Message-
From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org
[mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@q
I found a crash in the graph example that comes with 5.2, but found it's
been reported already here
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-33080 since 5.1.1.
It's assigned to "Qt Documentation Team" so maybe it has been overlooked
for a while?
__
On 12/09/2013 05:42 PM, Matthias Kleine wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> is there an established pattern for repainting a canvas once a property
> that is accessed during painting changes? If not, I suggest to add a
> RepaintingCanvas. See the attachment for a naive implementation. Is
> there a chance for some
On 12/10/2013 08:18 PM, Kurt Pattyn wrote:
> Thanks for the info. Is there a target date for 5.2.1?
>
> I want to give a helping hand, but how can this be coordinated so that
> no two people are fixing the same warnings?
I don't think that you'll have that problem! :D
>
> Regards,
> Kurt
>
> On 1
>> John has one point: he could remove the fallback code for the timezone
>> support.
> Not for QTimeZone, the Vista stuff only extends the XP support, it
> doesn't replace it. For QLocale and QCollator we could remove
> fallback code.
> John.
If there are places where our *_win.cpp would be a
On 9 December 2013 22:23, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> As Kenneth reminds us[1], Microsoft is ending the security updates for Windows
> XP in April 2014. That's about when we plan to release Qt 5.3.
>
> Should we stop supporting Windows XP? Is there anything we can improve in our
> codebase if we do?
On 10 December 2013 16:29, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> John has one point: he could remove the fallback code for the timezone
> support.
Not for QTimeZone, the Vista stuff only extends the XP support, it
doesn't replace it. For QLocale and QCollator we could remove
fallback code.
John.
___
On Wednesday 11. December 2013 10.12.22 Knoll Lars wrote:
> On 11/12/13 10:03, "Simon Hausmann" wrote:
> >On Wednesday 11. December 2013 09.36.46 Simon Hausmann wrote:
> >[...]
> >
> >> > If we apply the change I mentioned in the other email, we change
> >>
> >>cases 2
> >>
> >> > and 3:
> >> >
>
On 11/12/13 10:03, "Simon Hausmann" wrote:
>On Wednesday 11. December 2013 09.36.46 Simon Hausmann wrote:
>[...]
>> > If we apply the change I mentioned in the other email, we change
>>cases 2
>> > and 3:
>> >
>> > 2bis) distro builds Qt once with -no-sse2 flags
>> >
>> >=> all libs compile
On Dec 11, 2013, at 6:27 AM, Jonathan Liu wrote:
> On 10 December 2013 18:34, Koehne Kai wrote:
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org
>>> [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On
>>> Behalf Of Thiago Macie
On Wednesday 11. December 2013 09.36.46 Simon Hausmann wrote:
[...]
> > If we apply the change I mentioned in the other email, we change cases 2
> > and 3:
> >
> > 2bis) distro builds Qt once with -no-sse2 flags
> >
> > => all libs compiled without SSE2
> > => QtQml generates interpreted
On Tuesday 10. December 2013 12.06.43 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On terça-feira, 10 de dezembro de 2013 19:52:35, Hausmann Simon wrote:
> > Would it be possible to build libQtQml for i686/SSE2, install it into
> > lib/sse2 and call it a day? I don't think it's worth shipping a pure i386
> > version o
On 03.12.2013 10:28, Thomas Hartmann wrote:
> There will be no design/welcome page everybody likes. What we can
> provide is a welcome page that works for everybody and does not get into
> the way.
I present an alternative, with a clearly defined feature set and without
room for bikeshedding (*)
24 matches
Mail list logo
