Re: [Development] ChangeLog updated for 5.2.0

2013-11-26 Thread Christian Gagneraud
On 19/11/13 17:02, Thiago Macieira wrote: > I've just updated the Changelog for 5.2.0 with the output from the script that > I've just uploaded at https://codereview.qt-project.org/71641. The changelog The help message still refer to header-diff BTW. my 2 cents, Chris > update is at https://code

Re: [Development] New Qt 5.2 snapshot build #172

2013-11-26 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 26 de novembro de 2013 14:46:06, Jake Petroules wrote: > > One big advantage is that we maintain one single codebase for all > > platforms. Doing it the Mac way requires us to start doing Qt SDKs > > installations per platform. > > Single codebase but a degraded user experience th

Re: [Development] New Qt 5.2 snapshot build #172

2013-11-26 Thread Jake Petroules
On Nov 26, 2013, at 1:19 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On terça-feira, 26 de novembro de 2013 11:56:20, Jake Petroules wrote: >> I agree with everything you say and as an OS X user I feel your pain. Qt SDK >> absolutely should be a drag and drop installer just like Xcode. >> Unfortunately there ar

Re: [Development] New Qt 5.2 snapshot build #172

2013-11-26 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 26 de novembro de 2013 11:56:20, Jake Petroules wrote: > I agree with everything you say and as an OS X user I feel your pain. Qt SDK > absolutely should be a drag and drop installer just like Xcode. > Unfortunately there are some major blockers in the way before we could > begin to

Re: [Development] QtDBus and kdbus

2013-11-26 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 26 de novembro de 2013 17:48:00, Krzesimir Nowak wrote: > Hi. > > From what I have seen here and there, there are plans to get rid of > libdbus-1 dependency in QtDBus. I guess that this is to be done by > implementing the DBus protocol from scratch in QtDBus (like GLib has > done w

Re: [Development] New Qt 5.2 snapshot build #172

2013-11-26 Thread Jake Petroules
On Nov 26, 2013, at 10:52 AM, Adam Strzelecki wrote: >> Yeah. Unfortunately it's not that easy to fix, since the Qt versions / >> toolchains packages register themselves into Qt Creator. > > Does it have to be so complicated? Why QtCreator just not figures out > installed Qt versions upon next

[Development] QtDBus and kdbus

2013-11-26 Thread Krzesimir Nowak
Hi. From what I have seen here and there, there are plans to get rid of libdbus-1 dependency in QtDBus. I guess that this is to be done by implementing the DBus protocol from scratch in QtDBus (like GLib has done with their GDBus). I guess that there would be a some kind of DBus backend based on U

[Development] Problem in the CI - solved

2013-11-26 Thread Sarajärvi Tony
Hi all Seems we had some problem in the CI. Log said that the machines couldn't establish SSH connection to Gerrit. A dozen or so submodules had ended up being stuck in integrating for you (error state for us). I just hit retry from our end and it looks like things work again. This means, that

Re: [Development] New Qt 5.2 snapshot build #172

2013-11-26 Thread Knoll Lars
I have to agree with Thiago. I tried the install on a retina mac book/10.9 two weeks ago, and the installer looked extremely ugly. It simply doesn¹t make for a good first impression. Cheers, Lars On 26.11.13 16:22, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: >On terça-feira, 26 de novembro de 2013 14:55:52, Koehn

Re: [Development] New Qt 5.2 snapshot build #172

2013-11-26 Thread Adam Strzelecki
> Yeah. Unfortunately it's not that easy to fix, since the Qt versions / > toolchains packages register themselves into Qt Creator. Does it have to be so complicated? Why QtCreator just not figures out installed Qt versions upon next run if they are installed on well known location, otherwise j

Re: [Development] New Qt 5.2 snapshot build #172

2013-11-26 Thread Jake Petroules
On Nov 26, 2013, at 10:22 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On terça-feira, 26 de novembro de 2013 14:55:52, Koehne Kai wrote: >>> FYI, installer font is still messed up on OSX 10.9. I have tried to find >>> the original bug report but only found QT 4.8.x reports marked fixed: >>> https://bugreports.q

Re: [Development] New Qt 5.2 snapshot build #172

2013-11-26 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 26 de novembro de 2013 14:55:52, Koehne Kai wrote: > > FYI, installer font is still messed up on OSX 10.9. I have tried to find > > the original bug report but only found QT 4.8.x reports marked fixed: > > https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-33049 > > https://bugreports.q

Re: [Development] New Qt 5.2 snapshot build #172

2013-11-26 Thread Koehne Kai
> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of Adam Strzelecki > Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 3:43 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] N

Re: [Development] New Qt 5.2 snapshot build #172

2013-11-26 Thread Jake Petroules
The installers are built with 4.8.5, right? My fix for the font issue (https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-32789, https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,70097) won't be in until 4.8.6. -- Jake Petroules Chief Technology Officer Petroules Corporation · www.petroules.com Email: jake.

Re: [Development] New Qt 5.2 snapshot build #172

2013-11-26 Thread Adam Strzelecki
FYI, installer font is still messed up on OSX 10.9. I have tried to find the original bug report but only found QT 4.8.x reports marked fixed: https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-33049 https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-32789 https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-31

[Development] New Qt 5.2 snapshot build #172 available..

2013-11-26 Thread Salovaara Akseli
Hi, We have new Qt 5.2 snapshot packages now available http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.2/5.2.0-rc1/2013-11-26_172/ Unfortunately Linux installers are not available. These packages are considered to be really close to RC1 release packages. Please report your testing effort via htt