On terça-feira, 22 de outubro de 2013 06:05:13, Hausmann Simon wrote:
> I think the problem is shipping binaries that accommodate the fact that
> every distro ships libudev in a different major version. That means you
> can't reliably use dynamic linking
Right.
There are two major versions of lib
I think the problem is shipping binaries that accommodate the fact that every
distro ships libudev in a different major version. That means you can't
reliably use dynamic linking :(
Simon
Fra: Donald Carr
Sendt: 07:46 tirsdag 22. oktober 2013
Til: Thiago Macieira
Kopi: development@qt-project.o
God dag,
I still don't follow the need for remove udev support:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/lucid/libudev-dev
There udev is as far back as Lucid. Where is it not present, exactly?
When you remove it from webkit, you remove joypad hotplug detection.
When you remove it from Qt, you remove the only
On segunda-feira, 21 de outubro de 2013 23:07:25, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> - libqgtk2: fix, it doesn't need libudev
>
> The fix for libqgtk2 can probably be:
> linux: QMAKE_LFLAGS += -Wl,--as-needed
Can anyone check if the other plugins linking to QtPlatformSupport also have
the udev dependency
sorry,
I have finded the issue .. A previous linked library (Qt4) to the apps that
I have copy in /usr/lib ... and forgotten .. I have trash the old lib, and
now It links and works correctly ...
2013/10/21 Ziller Eike
>
> On 20.10.2013, at 21:34, qtnext wrote:
>
> > I use now Qt5.1.1, try to
On segunda-feira, 21 de outubro de 2013 21:24:07, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> Note that udev in general is built from systemd source tree, even for
> distributions that don't default to systemd.
>
> > LIBUDEV_CURRENT=13
> > LIBUDEV_REVISION=2
> > LIBUDEV_AGE=13
> >
> > That's libtool speak for 0.13.2.
On 2013-10-21, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> But what distributions are those that don't have libudev.so.0?
Most modern ones I think.
>
> http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/hotplug/udev.git/tree/Makefile.am
Note that udev in general is built from systemd source tree, even for
distributions that don't
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Mitch Curtis wrote:
> On 09/21/2013 12:15 AM, Alan Alpert wrote:
>>
>> A while ago it came up that the rules for license headers in QML files
>> isn't clearly defined. Here's my suggestion for how to define it, and if
>> the project likes the idea we can get a lega
On segunda-feira, 21 de outubro de 2013 14:29:27, Koehne Kai wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> In the latest Linux binary packages for 5.2 libQt5Webkit depends on
> libudev.so.0, which isn't installed (or at least not in this version) on a
> lot of distributions:
>
> https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse
Hi Kai,
I can say only about the QtSerialPort.
The QtSerialPort module is used the libudev ((more precisely - the libudev
devel is required !!!) as preferred way (for the QSerialPortInfo class) to
detect a names and other info about present serial ports.
The support of libudev will detected i
Thanks for the quick feedback, this review is closed. I will test in qt5
and perhaps submit a followup patch.
Graham
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Graham Coleman wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I'm awaiting reviews for my first submission, a small bugfix I proposed on
> JIRA, but do not know if I h
Hi there,
In the latest Linux binary packages for 5.2 libQt5Webkit depends on
libudev.so.0, which isn't installed (or at least not in this version) on a lot
of distributions:
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-34176
The easiest fix would be to configure Qt with -no-libudev / remov
Greetings,
I'm awaiting reviews for my first submission, a small bugfix I proposed on
JIRA, but do not know if I have added appropriate reviewers (I added a few
from 'git history' and the Maintainer chart as suggested). The Contribution
guidelines document suggests to also ask here.
The bug, patc
Got it. Thanks a lot guys.
Regards,
-mandeep
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 06:33:14PM +0530, Mandeep Sandhu wrote:
>> How do I handle this?
>>
> git pull --rebase
> ___
> Development mailing list
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 06:33:14PM +0530, Mandeep Sandhu wrote:
> How do I handle this?
>
git pull --rebase
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Hi,
Whether you merge immediately or later all 3 changes at the same time is really
up to you.
If you do merge individually then you have to rebase your branch once the first
change was merged (git pull --rebase origin dev). Once you have rebased git
will not attempt to push the already closed
Hi All,
I have a newbie question on our Gerrit workflow.
Suppose a change I'm working on is split across 3 commits. Each commit
implements a part of the functionality of the change.
Once I get approval for a particular changeset, should I merge it to
staging immediately or wait for approval for
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 03:50:29PM +0800, cat fa wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> object_script files are generated due to the reason discussed
> in http://www.qtcentre.org/archive/index.php/t-6002.html . When
> excuting make distclean, all Makefiles are removed except
> object_script files. I think
21.10.2013, 16:06, "Mandeep Sandhu" :
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Is there a safe to recover from a bad rebase ? I've squashed commits
>>> incorrectly.
>> Use 'git reflog' to get the HEAD of the commit before the squash, and use
>> git reset to restore it.
>
> Thanks Kai! That fixed it!
Note that i
Thanks, Simon.
We copy the QML parser into qtbase/tools/qdoc so that qtbase doesn't depend on
qtdeclarative, so I expect we have an old parser.
martin
From: Hausmann Simon
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 2:08 PM
To: development@qt-project.org
Cc: Smith Ma
On Monday 21. October 2013 13.33.43 Martin Smith wrote:
> The QML parser has callbacks for processing the Import list and for
> processing individual imports. In qdoc, I used the one that gets the entire
> import list:
>
> virtual bool visit(UiImportList *) { return true; }
> virtual bool visit(
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Is there a safe to recover from a bad rebase ? I've squashed commits
>> incorrectly.
>
> Use 'git reflog' to get the HEAD of the commit before the squash, and use git
> reset to restore it.
Thanks Kai! That fixed it!
-mandeep
>
> Regards
>
> Kai
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org
> [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On
> Behalf Of Mandeep Sandhu
> Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 1:50 PM
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: [Development] Recover f
Hi All,
Is there a safe to recover from a bad rebase ? I've squashed commits
incorrectly.
Situation before rebase was:
(oldest) A -> B -> C -> D (newest)
I wanted to squash B & D together so during interactive rebase, I
chose 'squash' options for B & D (wrongly assuming that these 2 would
get s
The QML parser has callbacks for processing the Import list and for processing
individual imports. In qdoc, I used the one that gets the entire import list:
virtual bool visit(UiImportList *) { return true; }
virtual bool visit(UiImport *) { return true; }
I assumed it would bet called once, w
On 09/21/2013 12:15 AM, Alan Alpert wrote:
> A while ago it came up that the rules for license headers in QML files
> isn't clearly defined. Here's my suggestion for how to define it, and if
> the project likes the idea we can get a legal check and then fix up the
> infrastructure to follow (sanity
On 20.10.2013, at 21:34, qtnext wrote:
> I use now Qt5.1.1, try to erase all Qt4 lib in my mac .. And I have always
> the same trouble. When I start macdeploy with verbose=2, I have the following
> error :
>
> ERROR: no file at
> "/Library/Frameworks/QtScript.framework/Versions/4/QtScri
On 18.10.2013, at 21:56, Yuë Liu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In QFileDialog documentation it says QFileDialog::DontUseSheet is no
> longer supported and user should use QFileDialog::open() if they want
> to use sheets, but for many simple application static methods are
> enough and simpler, and when po
28 matches
Mail list logo