Hi,
The code coverage statistics of qtbase.git are now online again:
http://download.froglogic.com/public/qt5-squishcoco-report/
The build was broken due to the sanity check which was treating warnings
as errors.
Regards,
Sébastien
NOTE: if you see that something is broken, do not hesitate to i
Furthermore, if they're going to be called QJniXxx and not QAndroidJniXxx, why
are they even in QtAndroidExtras?
They aren't Android-specific, so what about placing them in a QtJavaExtras
module instead?
Who knows, some other Java-based platform may come along at some point.
--
Jake Petroules
On terça-feira, 8 de outubro de 2013 00:02:45, Stromme Christian wrote:
> So the options are QAndroidJniXxx and QJniXxx? Personally I prefer the
> later.
Would this class work with a different JNI? Suppose Qt Jambi wanted to use
those classes. Would they even compile?
If so, then the generic nam
The names are one part legacy and one part for consistency. Either way I don't
feel strongly about the names, so
if we can agree on the names I'll fix it asap.
So the options are QAndroidJniXxx and QJniXxx? Personally I prefer the later.
--
Christian
Thiago Macieira wrote:
On segunda-feira,
On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 10:11:28PM +0200, Alejandro Exojo wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've stumbled upon the names of the classes in Qt Android Extras:
> - QJNIEnvironment
> - QJNIObject
>
> The all capital part due to the acronym is inconsistent with other Qt
> classes,
> where the acronym is written as
On segunda-feira, 7 de outubro de 2013 22:11:28, Alejandro Exojo wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've stumbled upon the names of the classes in Qt Android Extras:
> - QJNIEnvironment
> - QJNIObject
>
> The all capital part due to the acronym is inconsistent with other Qt
> classes, where the acronym is written
Hi.
I've stumbled upon the names of the classes in Qt Android Extras:
- QJNIEnvironment
- QJNIObject
The all capital part due to the acronym is inconsistent with other Qt classes,
where the acronym is written as if it were a word: e.g. QHttp* instead of
QHTTP*, QUrl instead of QURL, etc.
I've
On segunda-feira, 7 de outubro de 2013 22:50:49, Dmitry Ashkadov wrote:
> The topic about exceptions for slots and signals has inspirited me to
> pay your attention to QtTest. QtTest is a good unit-test framework, but
> it is focused to Qt. I think QtTest may be used for any project,
> moreover
Hello!
The topic about exceptions for slots and signals has inspirited me to
pay your attention to QtTest. QtTest is a good unit-test framework, but
it is focused to Qt. I think QtTest may be used for any project,
moreover it may be used as unit testing framework for project that
doesn't use Q
Le 07/10/2013 15:33, Olivier Goffart a écrit :
> On Monday 07 October 2013 12:52:48 Grégoire Barbier wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm currently porting for the first time a Qt4 app to Qt5 and meanwhile
>> discovering new great Qt5 features, therefore I'm far from beeing an expert.
>>
>> However my current
On Monday 07 October 2013 12:52:48 Grégoire Barbier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently porting for the first time a Qt4 app to Qt5 and meanwhile
> discovering new great Qt5 features, therefore I'm far from beeing an expert.
>
> However my current opinion about Qt5 new connect syntaxes is that the
>
* Nagy-Egri M?t? Ferenc [2013-10-07 11:23:26 +]:
> Should the error be addressed on the project side or be reported to MS
> and hope a fix comes before final version?
ICE are almost always on MS side. Often you can find some workaround
until they fix it. For example sometimes only rearrangin
Hi!
I’m trying to build a program that extensively makes use of the proper template
machinery under Visual Studio 2013 plus uses Qt GUI libs, therefore I took on
the venture of building Qt 5.2 with Visual Studio 2013. However, configure.bat
fails at compilation, namely:
c:\users\mátéferenc\d
On 7 oct. 2013, at 11:58, John Layt wrote:
> On 7 October 2013 08:54, Samuel Gaist wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In which room are you hidden ? :-)
>
> We are on the first floor, in a meeting room next to the coffee at the
> end of the corridor past the toilets. If you can't find it come and
> see me a
Le 05/10/2013 18:24, Olivier Goffart a écrit :
(...)
> As you may or may not know, it is a bit tricky to use the pointer based
> connection syntax with overloaded signals or slot.
>
> If you do, say:
>
> connect(process, &QProcess::error;
> this , &MyObject::processError);
>
> You get a com
On Sun Oct 6 20:51:40 CEST 2013, Lars Knoll wrote:
> The producer field in PDF is generally used for marking what has been used
> to produce the PDF. In Qt 5 this reads:
>
>xprintf("\n/Producer ");
>printString(QString::fromLatin1("Qt " QT_VERSION_STR " (C) 2012 Digia
> Plc and/or its subs
On 7 October 2013 08:54, Samuel Gaist wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In which room are you hidden ? :-)
We are on the first floor, in a meeting room next to the coffee at the
end of the corridor past the toilets. If you can't find it come and
see me at the KDE booth in the 1st floor exhibition room.
Cheers!
On 6 oct. 2013, at 14:39, John Layt wrote:
> On 22 August 2013 21:24, John Layt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Qt Dev Days Europe is coming up on October 7-9 and once again this
>> year KDE e.V. is partnering with Digia, KDAB and ICS in the running of
>> the event. In particular KDE is once again helping
18 matches
Mail list logo
