Re: [Development] Implementing of a DNS feature under Windows [QTBUG-30166]

On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Chris W wrote: > On 01/10/13 14:24, Mandeep Sandhu wrote: > > > > The MSDN doc link doesn't mention any specific OS version: > > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/hh447188(v=vs.85).aspx > > < > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows

Re: [Development] Implementing of a DNS feature under Windows [QTBUG-30166]

On 01/10/13 14:24, Mandeep Sandhu wrote: > > The MSDN doc link doesn't mention any specific OS version: > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/hh447188(v=vs.85).aspx > > > > But I could be miss

Re: [Development] Implementing of a DNS feature under Windows [QTBUG-30166]

Hi Sahne, Thanks for the heads. Some comments inline... Hi Mandeep, > > DnsQueryEx unfortunately requires Windows 8. > The MSDN doc link doesn't mention any specific OS version: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/hh447188(v=vs.85).aspx But I could be missing something obvi

Re: [Development] Q_GADGET = relocation on staticMetaObject; Q_OBJECT = no relocation; known?

On segunda-feira, 30 de setembro de 2013 17:30:33, Thiago Macieira wrote: > # Here's where the size of the object is useful > $ objdump -R libQt5Core.so.5 | egrep '^00669(0e|0f|10).' | sort > 006690e8 R_X86_64_RELATIVE *ABS*+0x00565800 > 006690f0 R_X86_64_RELATIVE

Re: [Development] Q_GADGET = relocation on staticMetaObject; Q_OBJECT = no relocation; known?

On terça-feira, 1 de outubro de 2013 01:09:07, Marc Mutz wrote: > I don't see any difference between the staticMetaObject's declared in > and generated from Q_GADGET as opposed to ones in/from Q_OBJECT with the > notable exception of a non-nullptr parent metaobject pointer. I don't > see, though, h

[Development] Q_GADGET = relocation on staticMetaObject; Q_OBJECT = no relocation; known?

Hi, I'm seeing a .data.rel.ro.local for staticMetaObject in objdump -TtRr for (apparently) each Q_GADGET use (say, QEvent, QSizePolicy), but not for any Q_OBJECT use (say QWidget, but funnily enough for QObject). I don't see any difference between the staticMetaObject's declared in and generat

Re: [Development] Bluetooth and NFC vs Reference Platforms

On segunda-feira, 30 de setembro de 2013 19:39:53, Knoll Lars wrote: > >As far as I know from my colleague, it misses some necessary API -- at > >least the connection state changes notification and device disappearing > >notification. > >We could prepare some patches during the next week or two, th

Re: [Development] Add API method to QDBusServer allowing anonymous authentication

On segunda-feira, 30 de setembro de 2013 20:02:47, Roland Winklmeier wrote: > - First of all, is this something, that has a chance to get into the > official repository? Yes, definitely. > - If yes, how should I proceed. Start developing it locally and send it > to gerrit? I have of course read t

Re: [Development] Bluetooth and NFC vs Reference Platforms

On 9/30/13 9:26 PM, "Konstantin Ritt" wrote: >As far as I know from my colleague, it misses some necessary API -- at >least the connection state changes notification and device disappearing >notification. >We could prepare some patches during the next week or two, though >QtBluetooth probably nee

Re: [Development] Bluetooth and NFC vs Reference Platforms

As far as I know from my colleague, it misses some necessary API -- at least the connection state changes notification and device disappearing notification. We could prepare some patches during the next week or two, though QtBluetooth probably needs few more revisions and API changes/fixes...but we

Re: [Development] Implementing of a DNS feature under Windows [QTBUG-30166]

Hi Mandeep, DnsQueryEx unfortunately requires Windows 8. So before using it, you'd need to check the library function exists. Then fall back on the older API if it doesn't. The MS support article you linked applies to windows 2000,XP and 2003 server only. So you need to check the behaviour isn't

Re: [Development] Bluetooth and NFC vs Reference Platforms

On 9/30/13 7:48 PM, "Konstantin Ritt" wrote: >2013/9/30 Knoll Lars > >On 9/30/13 5:38 PM, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: >> >>Similarly for Bluetooth, which exists on all platforms. But since I don't >>know >>the QtBluetooth API, I don't know whether the API implemented makes sense >>for >>the deskto

[Development] Add API method to QDBusServer allowing anonymous authentication

Hi there, first of all I want to say hello. I was using Qt since quite a while now, but never did any developing for Qt itself. For my next project I identified some things I would need to add to the offical Qt libraries. Since I don't want to role out my customised ones, but stick with the offici

Re: [Development] Bluetooth and NFC vs Reference Platforms

2013/9/30 Knoll Lars > On 9/30/13 5:38 PM, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: > > > >Similarly for Bluetooth, which exists on all platforms. But since I don't > >know > >the QtBluetooth API, I don't know whether the API implemented makes sense > >for > >the desktops. Can someone clarify? > > Bluetooth mak

Re: [Development] Codifying the .qml License Header Exemption

On 9/30/13 7:00 PM, "Oswald Buddenhagen" wrote: >On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 03:15:47PM -0700, Alan Alpert wrote: >> Looking at the file sizes, I recommend excluding QML files under >> "tests" from requiring a license header if they have <=15 LoC. >> >in general i support this proposal, but as i said

Re: [Development] Bluetooth and NFC vs Reference Platforms

On Monday, September 30, 2013, Knoll Lars wrote: > On 9/30/13 5:38 PM, "Thiago Macieira" > > > wrote: > >Similarly for Bluetooth, which exists on all platforms. But since I don't > >know > >the QtBluetooth API, I don't know whether the API implemented makes sense > >for > >the desktops. Can someo

Re: [Development] Bluetooth and NFC vs Reference Platforms

On segunda-feira, 30 de setembro de 2013 16:39:42, Knoll Lars wrote: > On 9/30/13 5:38 PM, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: > >Qt Project guidelines say that all features that are relevant for the > >reference platforms must be implemented in the reference platforms. > > No. It has to be implemented on a

Re: [Development] Codifying the .qml License Header Exemption

On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 03:15:47PM -0700, Alan Alpert wrote: > Looking at the file sizes, I recommend excluding QML files under > "tests" from requiring a license header if they have <=15 LoC. > in general i support this proposal, but as i said elsewhere i think you are being a bit too short-sighte

Re: [Development] Bluetooth and NFC vs Reference Platforms

On 9/30/13 5:38 PM, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: >Qt Project guidelines say that all features that are relevant for the >reference platforms must be implemented in the reference platforms. No. It has to be implemented on all reference platforms if the module is an essential module. Add-ons where alw

Re: [Development] Bluetooth and NFC vs Reference Platforms

Thiago Macieira kirjoitti 30.9.2013 kello 18.38: > Qt Project guidelines say that all features that are relevant for the > reference platforms must be implemented in the reference platforms. > > For NFC, I understand that Mac and Windows (desktop) support is not relevant. > However, on Linux,

[Development] Bluetooth and NFC vs Reference Platforms

Qt Project guidelines say that all features that are relevant for the reference platforms must be implemented in the reference platforms. For NFC, I understand that Mac and Windows (desktop) support is not relevant. However, on Linux, neard has existed for a while, so I say that Linux support i

Re: [Development] Policy: supplying the preferred format for modifications for everything we ship

On Monday 30 September 2013 08:36:50 Konrad Rosenbaum wrote: > On Sunday 29 September 2013 22:26:41 Olivier Goffart wrote: > > As we do not modify those files, but take them from upstream, having a > > README that say where the file are from is enough. > > I don't see why it should be part of the t

Re: [Development] Policy: supplying the preferred format for modifications for everything we ship

On Sunday 29 September 2013 13:31:11 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On domingo, 29 de setembro de 2013 20:17:09, Knoll Lars wrote: > > I don't fully agree with this. > > > > I certainly don't want us to add huge amounts of data into our > > repositories (as e.g. high resolution vector images). IMO it si

[Development] Qt 5.2 Alpha Testing

Hello, In order to discover errors soon and to be able to fix them before release day, we started testing of Qt 5.2 Alpha release. There are about 4 runs of sanity testing planned before the final is released. We would like to kindly ask you for help by testing the new packages. 1. Source pa

Re: [Development] Minified javascript libraries in Qt source code

On Monday 30 September 2013 13:29:22 Stephen Kelly wrote: > On Sunday, September 29, 2013 18:22:47 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > > wrote: > > > > In including the jquery code in > > > > /usr/share/qt4/doc/html/webkit-fancybrowser- jquery-min-js.html the > > > > jquery codes becomes under t

Re: [Development] Minified javascript libraries in Qt source code

On Sunday, September 29, 2013 18:22:47 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > > In including the jquery code in > > > /usr/share/qt4/doc/html/webkit-fancybrowser- jquery-min-js.html the > > > jquery codes becomes under the LGPL. > > > > > > > > What do you mean 'becomes under'? > > The c

[Development] Qt 5.2 Alpha is out

Hi all! Qt 5.2 Alpha release is now out, see http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2013/09/30/qt-5-2-alpha-available/ Alpha is source code delivery only (as agreed). The plan forward is now to create a beta (including binary packages) during the next few weeks, see Qt 5.2 schedule from http://qt-proje