On Saturday 14 Sep 2013 03:04:45 John Layt wrote:
> * Rather strangely timeSpec() is 30% slower despite now only returning the
> member directly instead of having to do a switch based on the member, a few
> other calls are equally confusing.
Ah, stupid me, I was including the creation in the timin
On Saturday 14 September 2013 14:27:00 Uwe Rathmann wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 22:16:43 +0200, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,43441 (currently waiting for a
> > review) is going to mark most of the QtAlgorithms functions as
> > deprecated.
>
> What does de
Il 14/09/2013 16:27, Uwe Rathmann ha scritto:
What does deprecated mean - will it be removed in some Qt 5.x or in Qt
6.0 ?
They can't be removed in Qt 5.x. The first chance to remove them will
come with Qt 6.
--
Join us at Qt Developer Days 2013! - https://devdays.kdab.com
Giuseppe D'Angelo
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 22:16:43 +0200, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,43441 (currently waiting for a
> review) is going to mark most of the QtAlgorithms functions as
> deprecated.
What does deprecated mean - will it be removed in some Qt 5.x or in Qt
6.0 ?
Ple
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Giuseppe D'An
> Comments?
I think it is a good move even though there was some pain like the msvc
2008 compilation. Thank you for your work.
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-projec
