Re: [Development] QT4.8.5 issue: multi-touch message cannot handled by "close" button

2013-09-12 Thread Rutledge Shawn
On 13 Sep 2013, at 7:53 AM, Duan Fugang-B38611 wrote: > Hi, all, > > We use the X.Org X Server 1.14.0 + QT4.8.5 to do one demo, but I catch one > issue: multi-touch message is not handled by “close” button. > > I use egalax touchscreen for the multi-touch test. > After kernel up, evtest tes

[Development] QT4.8.5 issue: multi-touch message cannot handled by "close" button

2013-09-12 Thread Duan Fugang-B38611
Hi, all, We use the X.Org X Server 1.14.0 + QT4.8.5 to do one demo, but I catch one issue: multi-touch message is not handled by "close" button. I use egalax touchscreen for the multi-touch test. After kernel up, evtest test the multi-touch message, all pass. Use xinput to do the test, also pa

Re: [Development] Qt WebEngine (Thiago Macieira)

2013-09-12 Thread Sundareson, Prabindh
iago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 190 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. Url

[Development] FW: QT4.8.5 issue: multi=touch message cannot handled by "close" button

2013-09-12 Thread Duan Fugang-B38611
Hi, all, We use the X.Org X Server 1.14.0 + QT4.8.5 to do one demo, but I catch one issue: multi-touch message is not handled by "close" button. I use egalax touchscreen for the multi-touch test. After kernel up, evtest test the multi-touch message, all pass. Use xinput to do the test, also p

[Development] QT4.8.5 issue: multi=touch message cannot handled by "close" button

2013-09-12 Thread Duan Fugang-B38611
Hi, all, We use the X.Org X Server 1.14.0 + QT4.8.5 to do one demo, but I catch one issue: multi-touch message is not handled by "close" button. I use egalax touchscreen for the multi-touch test. After kernel up, evtest test the multi-touch message, all pass. Use xinput to do the test, also pa

Re: [Development] More on QDateTime / QTimeZone

2013-09-12 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 12 de setembro de 2013 21:06:03, John Layt wrote: > * Choose either local msecs or epoch msecs, if epoch then that change can't > be done for 5.2 Choose the easiest for you to implement. We're running out of time, so I'd rather stick to the implementation you have and your best

Re: [Development] New SceneGraph related issue

2013-09-12 Thread Tomasz Olszak
I got stracktrace. It is as you predicted glDrwaElements. Is there any possibility to make some kind of workaround patch to make it work on emulator (I suppose it is emulator GL issue), perhabs by turning off some optimizations and so on? I would like to add such patch to rpm emulator package until

Re: [Development] More on QDateTime / QTimeZone

2013-09-12 Thread Knoll Lars
On 9/12/13 9:06 PM, "John Layt" wrote: >Hi, > >Another QDateTime email. I'm still trying to get a fully working >reimplementation of QDateTime as well as the QTimeZone support in for >5.2, but >there's a couple of issues outstanding. > >Storage format / Change of System Time Zone behaviour: My

Re: [Development] More on QDateTime / QTimeZone

2013-09-12 Thread Robin Burchell
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Knoll Lars wrote: > We might be able to simply cache the time zone offset once and cache it. > Then it should be at the same speed. This would also probably provide hidden wins in various places, making changes like b9ef4a9c3047228ec007ac81ff0a304f8cc274b7 in qtba

Re: [Development] Qt WebEngine

2013-09-12 Thread Richard Gerd Kuesters
Thanks Lars! It seems like a big step, indeed, after reading it on the blog. I (as a developer) appreciate the concern about code migration in the future, which I think (I may be wrong) will not be a PITA since Blink came as Webkit fork (sharing the same root and bla bla bla). But, I have so

Re: [Development] constexpr and qMetaTypeId<>()

2013-09-12 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 12 de setembro de 2013 09:38:16, achart...@fastmail.fm wrote: > Thiago - The qMetaTypeId documentation > (http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.1/qtcore/qmetatype.html#qMetaTypeId) > specifically states that the type registration using this function is > resolved at compile-time, not run-

[Development] More on QDateTime / QTimeZone

2013-09-12 Thread John Layt
Hi, Another QDateTime email. I'm still trying to get a fully working reimplementation of QDateTime as well as the QTimeZone support in for 5.2, but there's a couple of issues outstanding. Storage format / Change of System Time Zone behaviour: My current changes on Gerrit for storing as msecs

Re: [Development] Qt WebEngine

2013-09-12 Thread Hausmann Simon
We're going to meet Alexis and Kenneth in two weeks. I was planning on talking to them about exactly that :) Simon Fra: Thiago Macieira Sendt: 17:44 torsdag 12. september 2013 Til: development@qt-project.org Emne: Re: [Development] Qt WebEngine On quinta-feira, 12 de setembro de 2013 12:03:39,

Re: [Development] constexpr and qMetaTypeId<>()

2013-09-12 Thread achartier
> Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 19:12:26 -0700 > From: Thiago Macieira > Subject: Re: [Development] constexpr and qMetaTypeId<>() > To: development@qt-project.org > Message-ID: <3962396.DaoebYs1tu@tjmaciei-mobl2> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > On quarta-feira, 11 de sete

Re: [Development] Qt WebEngine

2013-09-12 Thread Cornelius Hald
Hi, the FAQ states: "We intend to make QtWebEngine available on all platforms that the upstream Chromium project supports, with the exception of Android. This also means iOS won’t be supported." So what are the plans for Android and iOS? We currently do not have QtWebkit on those platforms and su

Re: [Development] Qt WebEngine

2013-09-12 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 12 de setembro de 2013 12:03:39, Knoll Lars wrote: > Hi, > > As many of you know, we've been doing some research on a (chromium based) > new web engine for Qt during spring and summer. I wanted to let you know > that we've now come to the conclusion that we want to continue these

Re: [Development] New SceneGraph related issue

2013-09-12 Thread Tomasz Olszak
2013/9/12 Sletta Gunnar > > On Sep 11, 2013, at 11:12 PM, Tomasz Olszak > wrote: > > > Hi, > > I have strange issue running most recent Qt sources on Tizen emulator > (qemu i586). > > Also I know that there are issues with supporting HW acceleration. For > example I need to export QML_BAD_GUI_RE

Re: [Development] New SceneGraph related issue

2013-09-12 Thread Sletta Gunnar
On Sep 11, 2013, at 11:12 PM, Tomasz Olszak wrote: > Hi, > I have strange issue running most recent Qt sources on Tizen emulator (qemu > i586). > Also I know that there are issues with supporting HW acceleration. For > example I need to export QML_BAD_GUI_RENDER_LOOP=1 because multithreaded >

Re: [Development] [Releasing] HEADS UP: Starting preparations for Qt 5.2.0 - merge 'dev' into 'stable'

2013-09-12 Thread Pasion Jerome
Hello Sean, Could you explain what your plans are with the release? We're getting the other modules into shape and it would be nice to get a clear story about Qt 3D. On the documentation side, we would need: -product information (module name, Essential/Add-on/Tech Preview status, and so on.) -

[Development] Qt WebEngine

2013-09-12 Thread Knoll Lars
Hi, As many of you know, we've been doing some research on a (chromium based) new web engine for Qt during spring and summer. I wanted to let you know that we've now come to the conclusion that we want to continue these efforts in the future. Please check http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2013/09/12

[Development] Qt platform plugin "offscreen"

2013-09-12 Thread Koehne Kai
Hi, I'm wondering whether the 'offscreen' platform plugin is of any use on Windows? I couldn't get it to behave on Windows (crashes on startup). And the Qtestlib documentation actually states " Currently the offscreen platform plugin is only fully supported on X11.". If nobody objects, I'd lik

Re: [Development] constexpr and qMetaTypeId<>()

2013-09-12 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Wednesday, September 11, 2013 14:29:44 achart...@fastmail.fm wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to use qMetaTypeId<>() in a constexpr expression. I have my own > custom type declared as such: > > class MyCustomClass : public QObject > { > Q_OBJECT > > // ... > }; > > Q_DECLARE_METATYPE(M

Re: [Development] A QtCore class for event-driven jobs

2013-09-12 Thread Konstantin Ritt
AFAIK, nesting event loops should be used with a great carefulness and in very limited set of cases, since it may break the expected order of event handling, i.e. when used as a signal waiter. Dunno if this changed since Qt 4.x, though. Regards, Konstantin 2013/9/12 André Somers > Op 11-9-2013