On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:46 PM, André Pönitz
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 03:48:18PM +0200, Juergen Bocklage-Ryannel wrote:
>> On 24.07.13 5:41 PM, Alan Alpert wrote:
>> > Since I can't seem to get them to speak up, I guess they don't care
>> > that much after all. I'll withdraw the suggesti
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 03:48:18PM +0200, Juergen Bocklage-Ryannel wrote:
> On 24.07.13 5:41 PM, Alan Alpert wrote:
> > Since I can't seem to get them to speak up, I guess they don't care
> > that much after all. I'll withdraw the suggestion again.
> >
> > See you in six months :P
> >
> Sorry haven
On 14.08.13 5:54 PM, Kurt Pattyn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I opensourced a Qt based module that implements the web socket protocol. The
> repository can be found here: https://github.com/KurtPattyn/QWebSockets.
> I have 2 questions:
> 1. Is there any interest in adding this to Qt?
+1 I'm very interested. I
On 24.07.13 5:41 PM, Alan Alpert wrote:
> Since I can't seem to get them to speak up, I guess they don't care
> that much after all. I'll withdraw the suggestion again.
>
> See you in six months :P
>
Sorry haven't seen this thread. I'm working in several customer projects
now using purely QML/JS.
There's a fair amount of legacy code using other methods for implementing
the private class pointer. Q_Q and Q_D macros are preferred though.
You don't need to merge your .cpp files, we generally have one .cpp per
class (though trivial classes don't always have their own file).
The point is that t
On 27 Aug 2013, at 1:39 PM, Ola Røer Thorsen wrote:
> Hi, I wanted to create an issue about a mouse wheel issue in QtQuick
> Flickable, but figured out it has been reported already:
> https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-21328
>
> Is this a "lost case" as I see the assignee is closed/
Hi, I wanted to create an issue about a mouse wheel issue in QtQuick
Flickable, but figured out it has been reported already:
https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-21328
Is this a "lost case" as I see the assignee is closed/inactive? Maybe it
should be re-assigned to someone else?
Tirsdag 20. august 2013 14.47.46 skrev Stephen Kelly:
> Hi,
>
> I haven't seen any other mails about this. Is anyone who is capable of doing
> something about it aware of the problem that qtbase CI keeps failing for
> reasons unrelated to the patches under test?
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane
