On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 4:17 AM, Kurt Pattyn wrote:
> Well,
>
> it is a fact that Qt has little to no native support for 'cloud' based
> client and server 'protocols', like REST, WebSockets, SOAP, aso. So, it
> would indeed be a nice addition to have support for the most popular
> 'protocols'.
>
Hi all.
> I prefer the latter but the classes should at least have some
consistent API.
This concept it is possible to expand and enter the general base class
or pattern of Protocol (or something like Protocols framework, by
analogy with QStateMachine framework). This class (or set of classe
Well,
it is a fact that Qt has little to no native support for 'cloud' based client
and server 'protocols', like REST, WebSockets, SOAP, aso. So, it would indeed
be a nice addition to have support for the most popular 'protocols'.
Should we have something like a QNetworkAccessManager with plugga
