Re: [Development] Bug status update

2013-08-11 Thread Thiago Macieira
On domingo, 11 de agosto de 2013 23:16:36, Samuel Gaist wrote: > out of curiosity I have checked what I could do but I didn't saw a > difference in the web interface. Is there a quick reference guide somewhere > about that ? You had to look at it before Laszlo closed the task. -- Thiago Macieira

Re: [Development] Bug status update

2013-08-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Samuel Gaist > out of curiosity I have checked what I could do but I didn't saw a > difference in the web interface. You cannot do much without the appropriate rights AFAIK. > Is there a quick reference guide somewhere about that ? > I tried to ask the same

Re: [Development] Bug status update

2013-08-11 Thread Thiago Macieira
On domingo, 11 de agosto de 2013 20:52:39, Samuel Gaist wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way (without necessarily bugging the default assignee) to update > a bug resolution for a "self reported/solved" bug ? > > i.e. https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-32674 You have to get it assigned to

Re: [Development] Bug status update

2013-08-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
Approvers can deal with those: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#admin,group,12 There are also a few other non-approvers (like me) who can do this, but it is perhaps best to ask the default assignee, and if no reaction takes place, give a polite ping to that person or someone else from the approv

Re: [Development] Bug status update

2013-08-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
You would need to either get rights for that on Jira, or ask others having those, provided you have not had such rights just yet. On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Samuel Gaist wrote: > Thank you very much ! > > I am currently working on several other things that are in review and some > of my ot

Re: [Development] Bug status update

2013-08-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
Done. On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Samuel Gaist wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a way (without necessarily bugging the default assignee) to > update a bug resolution for a "self reported/solved" bug ? > > i.e. https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-32674 > > ___

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Charley Bay wrote: > Tony sayeth: > , > > We'd like to change the reference platforms a bit. We have new > platforms coming in and old ones are just that.old. > > , > > These changes would be targeted for Qt 5.2 and t

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-11 Thread Charley Bay
> > Tony sayeth: >>> , We'd like to change the reference platforms a bit. We have new platforms coming in and old ones are just that.old. >>> >>> , These changes would be targeted for Qt 5.2 and the current proposition can be seen here: http://

Re: [Development] Puzzled by desktop development priorities, Mac OS specifically [Warning: Rant]

2013-08-11 Thread qtnext
It works for me for a Quick2 application, but I have tried the same for a Widget Opengl QT5 application and When I launch macdeployqt I have the following error : ERROR: no file at "/Library/Frameworks/QtScript.framework/Versions/4/QtScript" ERROR: no file at "/Library/Frameworks/QtCore.framework/V

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-11 Thread qtnext
for X64, msvc2012 is fine, but it seems that for XP 32, msvc 2012 is not possible If I have correctly understand. 2013/8/11 Laszlo Papp > > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Charley Bay wrote: > >> Tony sayeth: >> >>> , >>> >>> We'd like to change the reference platforms a bit. We have new p

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-11 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Charley Bay wrote: > Tony sayeth: > >> , >> >> We'd like to change the reference platforms a bit. We have new platforms >> coming in and old ones are just that.old. >> > > >> , >> >> These changes would be targeted for Qt 5.2 and the current proposition >> can be