Thanks, I compiled and installed from
http://download.qt-project.org/snapshots/qt/5.1/5.1.1-rc1/backups/2013-08-10-96/single/
did a reboot and tested again, I didn't notice any difference, I get about
190-220ms on Qt 5.1.1rc1 (while qt4 takes less than 100ms).
I wonder if I picked the wrong source
On domingo, 11 de agosto de 2013 02:14:47, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote:
> Did anyone notice that
> QApplication app(argc, argv)
> takes on Qt5 about 220ms (warm execution) to execute while on Qt4 only
> about 50-75ms (warm execution)?
> Another person confirmed these results on his computer.
>
> Can anyo
On sábado, 10 de agosto de 2013 23:53:48, Tomasz Olszak wrote:
> > In addition, I strongly doubt LD_LIBRARY_PATH supports relative paths.
>
> It supports relative to cwd paths.
And RPATH overrides LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
However, the presence of RUNPATH disables RPATH. LD_LIBRARY_PATH overrides
RUNPAT
Tony sayeth:
> ,
> We'd like to change the reference platforms a bit. We have new platforms
> coming in and old ones are just that.old.
>
> ,
> These changes would be targeted for Qt 5.2 and the current proposition can
> be seen here:
>
> http://qt-project.org/wiki/CI_Configurations
>
> (That we
2013/8/10 Nicolás Alvarez
> 2013/8/10 Tomasz Olszak :
> > It looks like LD_LIBRARY_PATH doesn't work because even if I set
> > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=. in /opt/usr/APPID/lib directory and execute ldd on e.g.
> > libQt5Qml.so I get:
>
> "name=value" in a Unix shell does *not* set an environment variable.
Hi,
Did anyone notice that
QApplication app(argc, argv)
takes on Qt5 about 220ms (warm execution) to execute while on Qt4 only
about 50-75ms (warm execution)?
Another person confirmed these results on his computer.
Can anyone please explain why it happens and if/when it gets fixed?
Using Ubuntu a
2013/8/9 Thiago Macieira
> On sexta-feira, 9 de agosto de 2013 17:14:11, Tomasz Olszak wrote:
> > Application without changing RPATH in Qt libraries and application
> binary:
> > http://pbrd.co/136t3GI
> >
> > This is application after RPATH modification:
> > http://pbrd.co/136tyR2
>
> Hi Tomasz
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> On 08/10/2013 01:45 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On sexta-feira, 9 de agosto de 2013 21:37:24, Chris Craig wrote:
> >> I am not sure what the correct value should be for a playground module
> that
> >> is more or less stagnant should
