Re: [Development] ICU decision?

2013-08-08 Thread Saether Jan-Arve
...and LCMapStringEx can be used for generating sort keys. However, there seems to be some things that need to be changed/removed from QCollator, such as the "index character" feature (I don't recall the exact function name). Also, the case sensitivity enum in QCollator can configure sorting t

Re: [Development] failing network tests on CI

2013-08-08 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quinta-feira, 8 de agosto de 2013 17:49:11, Stephen Kelly wrote: > > > If we disable the tests, to be reasonably sure of not introducing > > > regressions, we should also stop all changes to QtNetwork, event loops > > > (QtCore and QPA pl

Re: [Development] epoll event dispatcher

2013-08-08 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 8 de agosto de 2013 17:46:05, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > epoll() perfectly fits the design of an object-oriented notifier > interface as we have. why does qt code toggle the notifiers so often? > would it be possible to rewrite it? Not sure. There is some code that does it becaus

Re: [Development] failing network tests on CI

2013-08-08 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 8 de agosto de 2013 17:49:11, Stephen Kelly wrote: > > If we disable the tests, to be reasonably sure of not introducing > > regressions, we should also stop all changes to QtNetwork, event loops > > (QtCore and QPA plugins) and QObject kernel. > > That's not necessary. The QtMetr

Re: [Development] failing network tests on CI

2013-08-08 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Thursday, August 08, 2013 08:24:33 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quinta-feira, 8 de agosto de 2013 16:15:25, Stephen Kelly wrote: > > Please fix the problem soon by doing whatever it takes to fix it quickly, > > not "properly". > > > > There has been months and months of time to fix the problem,

Re: [Development] failing network tests on CI

2013-08-08 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 8 de agosto de 2013 16:15:25, Stephen Kelly wrote: > Please fix the problem soon by doing whatever it takes to fix it quickly, > not "properly". > > There has been months and months of time to fix the problem, during which > time the problem has not been fixed. I don't even know

Re: [Development] failing network tests on CI

2013-08-08 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 8 de agosto de 2013 10:24:09, Richard Moore wrote: > I've already > sent over to Tony a script > that will allow us to detect when these services are broken before we > actually do the CI run in > order to avoid wasting time on something that will fail down the road > (as agreed at

Re: [Development] epoll event dispatcher

2013-08-08 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 8 de agosto de 2013 10:38:10, Cyril Oblikov wrote: > Hi guys, > > I wonder if anyone is working on epoll event dispatcher for Qt5 to > replace current select/poll based solution? > > For now I've only found QTBUG-24957 [1], and two different > implementations on github based on l

Re: [Development] failing network tests on CI

2013-08-08 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Thursday, August 08, 2013 11:13:51 Peter Hartmann wrote: > Hello, > > since the network tests seem to be failing a lot, how about disabling > the biggest offender (QSslSocket test) for now? Hi, Please fix the problem soon by doing whatever it takes to fix it quickly, not "properly". There

Re: [Development] failing network tests on CI

2013-08-08 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote: > PS.: Apparently, that bit is missing from the session minutes though: > http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2013/wiki/Qt_Network_CS_2013 > Cannot remember whether or not it had been the CI session instead, though: http://qt-pr

Re: [Development] failing network tests on CI

2013-08-08 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Richard Moore wrote: > Since the problem is generally the proxy servers on the network test > server, won't this simply > move the problem to other tests that use this service? I've already > sent over to Tony a script > that will allow us to detect when these ser

Re: [Development] Puzzled by desktop development priorities, Mac OS specifically [Warning: Rant]

2013-08-08 Thread Jake Thomas Petroules
What we really need is to complete the Relocatable Qt project and use @rpath in the install names of Qt frameworks. Then macdeployqt would not need to exist, or would consist merely of a bunch of copy commands. -- Jake Petroules Chief Technology Officer Petroules Corporation · www.petroules.com

Re: [Development] Puzzled by desktop development priorities, Mac OS specifically [Warning: Rant]

2013-08-08 Thread qtnext
if I use the script to patch the //, macdeployqt from qt5.1., then script postmacdeployqt ... it works fine :) ... Thanks a lot :) 2013/8/6 Thiago Macieira > On terça-feira, 6 de agosto de 2013 15:38:43, Rutledge Shawn wrote: > > On 6 Aug 2013, at 5:09 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > Note that