Re: [Development] ICU decision?

2013-08-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 8 de agosto de 2013 00:43:20, John Layt wrote: > * Spellout Style, e.g "ten" > * Ordinal Style, e.g. "10th" - ICU only > * Currency Name Style, e.g. "10 US Dollars" - ICU only > * Decimal Pattern - user defined pattern and symbols > * Padding - alter pad char, pad width, pad posit

Re: [Development] ICU decision?

2013-08-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 23:57:01, André Pönitz wrote: > On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 07:29:03PM +, Knoll Lars wrote: > > I agree that ICU is a large dependency, but we can't simply leave out > > important features forever because of this neither. and collation is > > something we have b

Re: [Development] ICU decision?

2013-08-07 Thread André Pönitz
On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 07:29:03PM +, Knoll Lars wrote: > I agree that ICU is a large dependency, but we can't simply leave out > important features forever because of this neither. and collation is > something we have been lacking for far too long. How important is it actually? How many peop

Re: [Development] ICU decision?

2013-08-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 19:29:03, Knoll Lars wrote: > But we can't (or rather should't) go for a least common denominator > approach neither. A public QCollator won't mean a non working QtCore even > if it has to fall back to unicode sort order on some OSes. And with ICU in > place it'

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 19:25:33, Laszlo Papp wrote: > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Thiago Macieira > > https://plus.google.com/u/0/+Linux/posts/JCA6uZYiXzg > > I do not see 3.2 declared non-LTS, in there, but I see it declared so on > the official site. Ok, then I change my reque

Re: [Development] Best-practice data type to pass JSON data between C++ and QML

2013-08-07 Thread Matt Broadstone
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Knoll Lars wrote: > Right now, they are probably the best you can get. Let's see if we can do > something better in the future. > > Is there any crossover between the work on v4m and the QJson classes you wrote for qt5? Or useable representations in v4m that could

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-07 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 18:45:16, Laszlo Papp wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Thiago Macieira > > > > wrote: > > > On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 17:05:51, Laszlo Papp wrote: > > > > > Also, please ensure that w

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 18:45:16, Laszlo Papp wrote: > On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Thiago Macieira > > wrote: > > On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 17:05:51, Laszlo Papp wrote: > > > > Also, please ensure that we have one of the LTS kernels (3.0, 3.4 or > > > > 3.10). > > > >

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-07 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 17:05:51, Laszlo Papp wrote: > > > Also, please ensure that we have one of the LTS kernels (3.0, 3.4 or > > > 3.10). > > > > We have had Ubuntu 12.04 LTS for a while using LTS kernel (3.2). > > That's an

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 17:05:51, Laszlo Papp wrote: > > Also, please ensure that we have one of the LTS kernels (3.0, 3.4 or > > 3.10). > > We have had Ubuntu 12.04 LTS for a while using LTS kernel (3.2). That's an unofficial LTS. I'm requesting, if possible, that we use an official

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-07 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Tony, would there be any OS X 10.6 machines left in the CI? If not, then I > think this is a bad idea. Like Jake says, 35% of the market still uses > 10.6, > we need Qt tested there. Apple accelerated the last two releases of their > OS > an

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 09:47:18, Sarajärvi Tony wrote: > As Ubuntu 10.04 is using KDE and not Gnome, I'd like to know what you think > if we used KDE in Ubuntu 13.04 as well? I'd rather we sticked to KDE. At the very least, kwin. It's a WM we know, behaves properly, and whose mainta

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 13:12:29, Sergio Ahumada wrote: > > Changes in short would be to drop OSX 10.6 and Ubuntu 10.04 from our > > builds. As new platforms we would bring up OSX 10.9 and Ubuntu 13.04. > > Also a new platform would be Windows 8.1, which would get one or two > > config

Re: [Development] ICU decision?

2013-08-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 08:00:27, Knoll Lars wrote: > >The only "degraded experience" I would accept is "full functionality for > >C and > >system locales". It would be acceptable for the classes to not have any > >support for other locales, like trying to get number formatting for >

Re: [Development] ICU decision?

2013-08-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 7 de agosto de 2013 13:39:36, Koehne Kai wrote: > Personally, I think ICU should be entirely optional for QtCore on Windows. > Windows API's offers much of the functionality we're using ICU for. QtCore > could then optionally try to load an ICU plugin for additional data ... I dis

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-07 Thread Jake Thomas Petroules
On Aug 7, 2013, at 7:12 AM, Sergio Ahumada wrote: > On 08/07/2013 11:47 AM, Sarajärvi Tony wrote: >> Hi all! >> >> We'd like to change the reference platforms a bit. We have new platforms >> coming in and old ones are just that.old. >> >> Changes in short would be to drop OSX 10.6 and Ubuntu 1

Re: [Development] New reference platforms in the CI for Qt5.2

2013-08-07 Thread deDietrich Gabriel
Hi, On 07 Aug 2013, at 11:47, Sarajärvi Tony mailto:tony.saraja...@digia.com>> wrote: Changes in short would be to drop OSX 10.6 and Ubuntu 10.04 from our builds. As new platforms we would bring up OSX 10.9 and Ubuntu 13.04. +1 for the OS X part. These changes would be targeted for Qt 5.2 and

Re: [Development] QtCS - QDateTime changes

2013-08-07 Thread Knoll Lars
On 06.08.13 23:44, "John Layt" wrote: >On Monday 05 Aug 2013 08:32:00 Knoll Lars wrote: >> On 26.07.13 22:26, "John Layt" wrote: > >> >It has been discussed to re-write QDateTime to internally store as an >> >absolute msecs since epoch which would inherently fix these issues and >> >greatly simp

[Development] QTextDocument - visibility support

2013-08-07 Thread Jaydeep Solanki
Hi, I'm trying to add support for visibility of Html elements in QTextDocument. I have implemented "visibility = collapse" and now I'm working on "hidden", but I'm having trouble leaving the exact amount of space as the text would take if it is not hidden. It would be really great, if someone can