This is a simple copy & paste from the wiki page, since the topic is fairly
short. See
http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2013/wiki/QtDBus_CS
h1. QtDBus module discussions at Qt Contributor Summit 2013
Topics for discussion:
* Rewriting the engine:
** Dropping the libdbus-1 dep
Notes are at
http://qt-project.org/groups/qt-contributors-summit-2013/wiki/QtCore_CS_2013
This is a summary of the important topics. For more info, please refer to the
wiki.
- QFileSelector: I asked Alan to finish discussing it during Akademy with the
KDE / Plasma folks, then submit for 5.2. I
On sexta-feira, 26 de julho de 2013 12:10:59, BogDan wrote:
> >> In this case I'll keep my -1 for that patch
> >>
> >> Can't cmake scripts be changed to work with SONAME set to
> >> libQt5X.so ?
> >
> > Why don't we do on Android what we do everywhere else?
> >
> > soname: libQt5
On sexta-feira, 26 de julho de 2013 19:33:40, John Layt wrote:
> I've started work on refactoring QLocale and my existing ICU api code
> to try make this work and should have a working proof-of-concept in a
> couple of weeks. At the very least, even without making the new
> classes public this sho
Nice session.
Unfortunately, I was attending to something else in parallel. Have you
discussed the "triage bugs" documentation to be written in there? As for
me, that seems to have been a long standing issue on the contribution wiki
page: http://qt-project.org/contribute
Just happened to me today
On sexta-feira, 26 de julho de 2013 09:59:06, BogDan wrote:
> In this case I'll keep my -1 for that patch
> Can't cmake scripts be changed to work with SONAME set to
> libQt5X.so ?
Why don't we do on Android what we do everywhere else?
soname: libQt5.so.5
actual file: libQ
On sexta-feira, 26 de julho de 2013 10:53:19, Juan Navarro wrote:
> In my opinion, if a function requires the user to provide a magnitude value
> (for whatever reason), then that value should be explicitly given in an
> additional parameter, not implicitly given as an added value to the already
> g
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
>
> if ((qFuzzyIsNull(p1) && qFuzzyIsNull(p2)) || qFuzzyCompare(p1, p2))
>
>
That's exactly like the macro with which I end up "convering" the current
Qt implementation.
On your first reply, you also said that
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:19 AM
