Re: [Development] QtQuick ML

2013-07-18 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > My KMail is configured for expiring dev emails after 90 days (the oldest > email > in the folder is from April 22). There are 1050 emails right now. > > 1050 / 90 = 11.6667 > Ah, ok. I only checked the thread numbers apparently as the gma

Re: [Development] QtQuick ML

2013-07-18 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 19 de julho de 2013 02.42.32, Laszlo Papp wrote: > > Do people agree it's high? Right now, we have a 350 emails / month average > > for > > the past 3 months (11-12 emails a day). > > I do not see 11-12 emails a day. How did you get that? My KMail is configured for expiring dev em

Re: [Development] QtQuick ML

2013-07-18 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quinta-feira, 18 de julho de 2013 08.07.02, Alan Alpert wrote: > > There were some specific KDE people then whom I had been talking to at > > DevDays who did not participate through the development ML on those > > topics, despite being i

[Development] GDB python pretty printers for common Qt classes

2013-07-18 Thread Milian Wolff
Hey all! KDevelop is since some time relying on python pretty printers to stringify common Qt container classes when using GDB [1]. They work nicely in any GDB console, as long as you compile your app with -O0 -g -fno-inline. If you don't do that, the existing pretty printers will start to fail

Re: [Development] QtQuick ML

2013-07-18 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 18 de julho de 2013 08.07.02, Alan Alpert wrote: > There were some specific KDE people then whom I had been talking to at > DevDays who did not participate through the development ML on those > topics, despite being interested in previous conversations. After > having more excellen

Re: [Development] Changelogs for Qt 5.1.x and 5.2

2013-07-18 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 18 de julho de 2013 13.18.32, Richard Moore wrote: > On 18 July 2013 01:34, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On quarta-feira, 17 de julho de 2013 21.45.11, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > >> Can we devise something simpler? Can we also put in our policies an > >> example of how a changelog f

Re: [Development] QtQuick ML

2013-07-18 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote: > > As for user questions, there is already the interest mailing list, and > for > > development... wasn't it okay when you sent a set of emails in here last > > time in a similar scenario and there was a significant amount

Re: [Development] QtQuick ML

2013-07-18 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote: > You haven't even addressed any of the arguments, which are the same as > the ones you (implicitly) agreed with about the IRC channels. > Alan, it is not the same, for me, at least. I have always considered the qml/quick

Re: [Development] Qt CS 2013 Documentation Session

2013-07-18 Thread Laszlo Papp
Thank you for the notes! On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Pasion Jerome wrote: > - Links in the pages can go to the overview, C++ page, QML page, or > elsewhere, which is confusing. > DoxyQML was shortly mentioned as the Plasma Active QML components is using that. After a bit of discussion