Re: [Development] Moc with clang.

2013-07-03 Thread Ray Donnelly
Someone should tell Google who have recently ported it to Android. On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quarta-feira, 3 de julho de 2013 13.12.02, Tr3wory wrote: > > Also the libc++ std library implementation has issues on windows, > > libc++ isn't meant to work outside of

[Development] Fwd: Icon-theme-spec update for scaled icons

2013-07-03 Thread Thiago Macieira
Have we implemented hidpi for QIcon::fromTheme? If so, does it match the proposal? If not, would this proposal work? -- Forwarded message -- Subject: Icon-theme-spec update for scaled icons Date: terça-feira, 2 de julho de 2013, 15.51.46 From: Alexander Larsson Para: x...@list

Re: [Development] Moc with clang.

2013-07-03 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 3 de julho de 2013 13.12.02, Tr3wory wrote: > Also the libc++ std library implementation has issues on windows, libc++ isn't meant to work outside of OS X. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center signature.

Re: [Development] Checking out Qt 5.0.2 sources

2013-07-03 Thread Tomasz Olszak
2013/7/3 Knoll Lars > On 02.07.13 17:15, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: > > >On terça-feira, 2 de julho de 2013 14.11.14, Tomasz Olszak wrote: > >> In the end however I have encounter: > >> https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-31817#comment-208125 > >> > >> I made some investigation and curr

Re: [Development] Moc with clang.

2013-07-03 Thread Ray Donnelly
If a project releases binary packages for a given OS, but they aren't able to make binaries for the latest version and if the latest release for that OS is marked experimental, then that fits my definition of "not mature". Also, not having 64bit doesn't point to much maturity (nor does forcing fix

Re: [Development] Moc with clang.

2013-07-03 Thread Laszlo Papp
It is really strange then they do not provide "mature" installers for the mature parts. On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Tr3wory wrote: > Maturity of clang on windows is a little complicated: > First you can use 2 ABI: gcc/mingw or msvc. > As far as I know the first is kind of working while the

Re: [Development] Qt Project 'official way' and maintenance? (Was: Qt 5.1.0 rc2 is out)

2013-07-03 Thread Pau Garcia i Quiles
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Tor Arne Vestbø wrote: What percentage of Qt developers develop on Windows? > Significant. Even when developing only for Windows, using Qt over Visual C++ makes worlds of difference. And it's not only Windows, it's also the cross-build features CMake provides (st

Re: [Development] Qt Project 'official way' and maintenance? (Was: Qt 5.1.0 rc2 is out)

2013-07-03 Thread Ray Donnelly
> Relevant for Qt Since Qt is an application framework, I think relevant for Qt implies "relevant for Qt and any project that uses it". IMHO the goal should be to fully support build systems to the extent they work on each platform or dropping that build system. CI'ing weird corner-case builds i

Re: [Development] Qt Project 'official way' and maintenance? (Was: Qt 5.1.0 rc2 is out)

2013-07-03 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Tor Arne Vestbø wrote: > On 7/3/13 12:12 , Laszlo Papp wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Tor Arne Vestbø >> > > >> wrote: >> >> There is also the question of platform support. Is cmake as relevant >> on >> Windo

Re: [Development] Qt Project 'official way' and maintenance? (Was: Qt 5.1.0 rc2 is out)

2013-07-03 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Tor Arne Vestbø wrote: > There is also the question of platform support. Is cmake as relevant on > Windows or OSX as it is on Linux? More so? > Not sure what exactly you mean by relevant, but cmake is a *cross*-*platform *, open-source build system. It has been use