Re: [Development] Making docs being built for every module

2013-06-06 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 6 de junho de 2013 18.51.44, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 01:07:06PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > On Thursday 06 June 2013 08:58:53 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > On quinta-feira, 6 de junho de 2013 17.57.08, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >

Re: [Development] Standard options & deploying on Mac OS X 10.6 while building on 10.7

2013-06-06 Thread Ziller Eike
> From: development-bounces+eike.ziller=digia@qt-project.org > [development-bounces+eike.ziller=digia@qt-project.org] on behalf of > Vincent [vincentb1...@gmail.com] > Sent: 06 June 2013 18:20 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] Standard options & deploying on Mac O

[Development] Standard options & deploying on Mac OS X 10.6 while building on 10.7

2013-06-06 Thread Vincent
Hello, I would like to be able to deploy Qt applications on Mac OS X 10.6. The development environment is on 10.7. I tried with Qt 5.0.2 and Qt 5.1.0 Beta 1 (downloaded binaries from qt-project.org) and none of the compiled applications run on Mac OS X 10.6. Then I tried to compile Qt 5.1.0 Beta

Re: [Development] Making docs being built for every module

2013-06-06 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Thursday 06 June 2013 08:58:53 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quinta-feira, 6 de junho de 2013 17.57.08, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > for the packagers, it would be the best solution to simply include the > > docs directly into the particular source tarballs. we have been doing > > that in ancient

Re: [Development] Making docs being built for every module

2013-06-06 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 6 de junho de 2013 17.57.08, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > for the packagers, it would be the best solution to simply include the > docs directly into the particular source tarballs. we have been doing > that in ancient times. and its consistent with shipping the syncqt'd > headers,

Re: [Development] Making docs being built for every module

2013-06-06 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Thursday 06 June 2013 08:44:21 Thiago Macieira wrote: [snip] > Can we simply ship a qtdocs tarball with all documentation pre-built? At least in Debian's case, it wouldn't be useful, as we need the sources (preferred way of modification) to build them. Of course, if it helps other people, cou

Re: [Development] Making docs being built for every module

2013-06-06 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Thursday 06 June 2013 17:38:53 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 12:25:18PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > Is there a way to tell qtbase to build it's documentation when make is > > called? It would be awesome if this could also be inherited by the other

Re: [Development] Making docs being built for every module

2013-06-06 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 6 de junho de 2013 17.38.53, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 12:25:18PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > > Is there a way to tell qtbase to build it's documentation when make is > > called? It would be awesome if this could also be inherited b

[Development] Making docs being built for every module

2013-06-06 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Hi! I have seen that many options from qtbase get inherited by other submodules when building them from separate tarballs. Is there a way to tell qtbase to build it's documentation when make is called? It would be awesome if this could also be inherited by the other submodules. Kinds regards, L

Re: [Development] Clarification on Mac 10.6 support for Qt 5.2

2013-06-06 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 6 de junho de 2013 11.22.28, Koehne Kai wrote: > > That means we need to change the Qt 5.1 RC1 build scripts to pass > > -no-c++11. > Isn't the lower risk approach to just revert the change in the release > branch? That is, we'd have the same behavior as with 5.0. I understand that

Re: [Development] Clarification on Mac 10.6 support for Qt 5.2

2013-06-06 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 6 de junho de 2013 07.52.53, Ziller Eike wrote: > Just for clarification, the default mkspec of Qt 5 on Mac is clang (without > libc++), not gcc/g++ . The default mkspec on Mac is now clang *with* libc++. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect -

Re: [Development] Clarification on Mac 10.6 support for Qt 5.2

2013-06-06 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 4 de junho de 2013 15.55.10, Thiago Macieira wrote: > As of 3d0a60aaa4077a8 in Qt 5.2 That change is in 5.1. That means we need to change the Qt 5.1 RC1 build scripts to pass -no-c++11. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Te