Re: [Development] Qt's cmake Config.cmake and ConfigVersion.cmake files

2013-05-14 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Monday, May 13, 2013 21:19:27 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > Hi, > > I had a closer look at the installed cmake files. > > The ConfigVersion.cmake files only check the version number. This is in many > cases good enough. > Additionally they should check that the 32/64bit-ness of the installed lib

Re: [Development] Qt 5.1 Beta Released

2013-05-14 Thread William Hallatt
Congratulations to everybody involved, things are moving really quickly and I'm very happy to count myself among the 500 000 (!!!) Qt users :) Regards, William Hallatt On 14 May 2013 13:10, Turunen Tuukka wrote: > > Link to blog should be: > http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2013/05/14/qt-5-1-bet

Re: [Development] Qt 5.1 Beta Released

2013-05-14 Thread Turunen Tuukka
Link to blog should be: http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2013/05/14/qt-5-1-beta-released/ Yours, Tuukka From: Tuukka Turunen mailto:tuukka.turu...@digia.com>> Date: tiistai 14. toukokuuta 2013 14.06 To: "development@qt-project.org" mailto:development@qt-projec

[Development] Qt 5.1 Beta Released

2013-05-14 Thread Turunen Tuukka
Hi All, We have now released Qt 5.1 Beta as agreed in the release team meeting yesterday. See: http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2013/05/08/qt-5-1-beta-released/ Now let's get the final pieces in place and 5.1.0 final out before summer. Yours, Tuukka ___

[Development] Developer build (was: 6 conflicting symbols between QtQuick 1 and 2)

2013-05-14 Thread Harri Porten
On Tue, 7 May 2013, Koehne Kai wrote: > Since apparently nobody has picked the ball up, I uploaded > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,55521,patchset=5 We can confirm that the patch achieves the intended goal of namespacing the discussed symbols. It's just that one should restrain fro

Re: [Development] Please warn of force pushes...

2013-05-14 Thread Simon Hausmann
On Tuesday 14. May 2013 05.48.57 Qi Liang wrote: > +1 for this. > > I met with this non-fast-forward case today. Sometimes, when people are > mirroring a git repo, and "git push --mirror" doesn't work well for some > reason. Then "git push --all" is a second choice, and this non-fast-forward > wil

Re: [Development] Please warn of force pushes...

2013-05-14 Thread Simon Hausmann
On Tuesday 23. April 2013 09.46.03 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On terça-feira, 23 de abril de 2013 18.20.11, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: [...] > > > > > Change the branch name when the policy changes. > > > > > > > > i really wouldn't want to do that. > > > > > > But you're not offering a better solut