I've pushed a review to Gerrit providing support for TLS supplemental data and
TLS extensions via a new pair of classes and APIs added to QSslSocket (six new
setters/accessors and four new signals).
Review available here:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#q,54364,n,z
Wiki topic updated to des
On segunda-feira, 22 de abril de 2013 17.44.41, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 08:11:22AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On segunda-feira, 22 de abril de 2013 16.59.27, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > > > And where is it documented for winrt?
> > >
> > > why should it be?
> >
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 08:11:22AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 22 de abril de 2013 16.59.27, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 07:48:07AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > On segunda-feira, 22 de abril de 2013 16.25.30, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > > > a
On segunda-feira, 22 de abril de 2013 16.59.27, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 07:48:07AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On segunda-feira, 22 de abril de 2013 16.25.30, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > > as far as i'm concerned, the push policy for all non-mainline branches
> >
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 07:48:07AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 22 de abril de 2013 16.25.30, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > as far as i'm concerned, the push policy for all non-mainline branches
> > (in particular those without a CI) is entirely up to the discretion of
> > thei
On segunda-feira, 22 de abril de 2013 16.25.30, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> as far as i'm concerned, the push policy for all non-mainline branches
> (in particular those without a CI) is entirely up to the discretion of
> their owners.
And where is it documented for winrt?
Anyway, I'm asking for
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 07:16:22AM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 22 de abril de 2013 10.15.43, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > why exactly would you care? everyone working on the respective branch is
> > somehow involved into the rebase process. everyone else doesn't need to
> > c
On segunda-feira, 22 de abril de 2013 10.15.43, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> why exactly would you care? everyone working on the respective branch is
> somehow involved into the rebase process. everyone else doesn't need to
> care/can reset --hard if they actually have a checkout.
Because "everyone
On segunda-feira, 22 de abril de 2013 07.44.31, Qi Liang wrote:
> Looks like the sync script(s) is running on your server(from codereview to
> gitorious)?
No, this is no the codereview-gitorious sync. This is just updating the
repositories so the statistics script can run.
--
Thiago Macieira - t
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 06:14:08PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> My server just let me know:
>
> >From git://gitorious.org/qt/qtbase
>60fbb00..c5a3cfa dev-> dev
>1f3a67e..f78842a stable -> stable
> ! [rejected]winrt -> winrt (non-fast-forward)
>
> PLEASE let
+1
This would make quick code browsing much easier; Gitorious' interface is rather
cumbersome.
--
Jake Petroules
Chief Technology Officer
Petroules Corporation · www.petroules.com
Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com
On Apr 22, 2013, at 3:44 AM, Qi Liang wrote:
> At 22/04/2013 03:14, from Thia
At 22/04/2013 03:14, from Thiago Macieira:
> My server just let me know:
>
>>From git://gitorious.org/qt/qtbase
> 60fbb00..c5a3cfa dev -> dev
> 1f3a67e..f78842a stable -> stable
> ! [rejected] winrt -> winrt (non-fast-forward)
>
> PLEASE let the mailing list know
Hi,
Am 22/04/2013 03:14, schrieb Thiago Macieira:
> My server just let me know:
>
>>From git://gitorious.org/qt/qtbase
> 60fbb00..c5a3cfa dev-> dev
> 1f3a67e..f78842a stable -> stable
> ! [rejected]winrt -> winrt (non-fast-forward)
>
> PLEASE let the mailing l
13 matches
Mail list logo
