Re: [Development] Qt/5.0.0, clang/3.2, C++11 and qRegisterMetaType, Q_BASIC_ATOMIC_INITIALIZER

2013-04-11 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 12 de abril de 2013 02.18.09, Olivier Goffart wrote: > On Thursday 11 April 2013 13:26:16 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On quinta-feira, 11 de abril de 2013 20.40.17, Jan Kundrát wrote: > > > On Thursday, 11 April 2013 20:17:22 CEST, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > > Clang. > > > > > > >

Re: [Development] Qt/5.0.0, clang/3.2, C++11 and qRegisterMetaType, Q_BASIC_ATOMIC_INITIALIZER

2013-04-11 Thread Olivier Goffart
On Thursday 11 April 2013 13:26:16 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quinta-feira, 11 de abril de 2013 20.40.17, Jan Kundrát wrote: > > On Thursday, 11 April 2013 20:17:22 CEST, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > Clang. > > > > > Its support for brace initialisation was incomplete. See the comment: > > Thanks

Re: [Development] Visual Studio Add-In 1.2.1 for Qt 5 Released

2013-04-11 Thread Alex Malyushytskyy
Great ! Thanks! Did not see this announcement on interest, so forwarding message there. Alex On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:57 AM, Turunen Tuukka wrote: > > Hi All, > > Visual Studio Add-In 1.2.1 for Qt 5 is now released, see: > http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2013/04/11/visual-studio-add-in-1-2-1-

Re: [Development] Qt/5.0.0, clang/3.2, C++11 and qRegisterMetaType, Q_BASIC_ATOMIC_INITIALIZER

2013-04-11 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 11 de abril de 2013 20.40.17, Jan Kundrát wrote: > On Thursday, 11 April 2013 20:17:22 CEST, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Clang. > > > Its support for brace initialisation was incomplete. See the comment: > Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. I've seen that ML thread > bef

Re: [Development] qt-5.0.1 incorrect ..._install_prefix cmake vars ?

2013-04-11 Thread Rex Dieter
Stephen Kelly wrote: > On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 17:35:19 Rex Dieter wrote: >> > Please try the attached instead. I can't update the patch in gerrit >> > until it finishes integrating. >> >> confirmed, test passes now. thanks again. > > Great. If you do run the tests from the build tree duri

[Development] Re: Qt/5.0.0, clang/3.2, C++11 and qRegisterMetaType, Q_BASIC_ATOMIC_INITIALIZER

2013-04-11 Thread Jan Kundrát
On Thursday, 11 April 2013 20:17:22 CEST, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Clang. > > Its support for brace initialisation was incomplete. See the comment: Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. I've seen that ML thread before but dismissed it as irrelevant as it was specifically talking about 3.

Re: [Development] Qt/5.0.0, clang/3.2, C++11 and qRegisterMetaType, Q_BASIC_ATOMIC_INITIALIZER

2013-04-11 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 11 de abril de 2013 19.53.04, Jan Kundrát wrote: > qmetatype.h:669:32: error: copying variable of type 'QBasicAtomicInt' (aka > 'QBasicAtomicInteger') invokes deleted constructor > static QBasicAtomicInt metatype_id = Q_BASIC_ATOMIC_INITIALIZER(0); [...] > qbasicatomic.h:19

[Development] Qt/5.0.0, clang/3.2, C++11 and qRegisterMetaType, Q_BASIC_ATOMIC_INITIALIZER

2013-04-11 Thread Jan Kundrát
Hi, I'm trying to port an application to Qt5. This is on a Linux system with clang 3.2 and Qt 5.0.0. The application requires C++11, but this particular file builds just fine when I remove -std=c++11 from the command line options. Build also succeeds with Gentoo's GCC 4.6.3 invoked with -std=c++

[Development] Rebuilding Qt5 after adding -prefix fails to link due to missing zlib options

2013-04-11 Thread Jan Kundrát
Hi, I've succesfully built Qt5 (release branch) on a Linux system with gcc 4.6. However, I forgot to add the -prefix option to configure, so I decided to do it once again (full command line `./configure -developer-build -opensource -no-gtkstyle -confirm-license -prefix /opt/qt5/`). However, now

[Development] hello all recievers

2013-04-11 Thread Akshay Nautiyal
scene is that i have to deploy an application on a server that runs centos 6.now, centos dosent support versions after glibc-2.12 .I have v-2.15 on my comp.need help in learning how to link a static v-2.15 glibc to my application so that is becomes 'almost' static.I have spent 2 days trying to fig

Re: [Development] Taking the new download system into production

2013-04-11 Thread Konrad Rosenbaum
On Thursday 11 April 2013 13:02:07 Turunen Tuukka wrote: > PS. Torrents are still under study. Most likely they can be quite easily > enabled, we'll see in the near future. Personally I am non convinced of > their benefits, but maybe that is just me ;) The benefits of torrents are not visible if y

Re: [Development] Switch of MinGW toolchain for Qt 5.1

2013-04-11 Thread Jonathan Liu
On 4/04/2013 8:38 PM, Koehne Kai wrote: > I'd like to update the recommended 32 bit MinGW toolchain (that we also ship > in binary installers) for 5.1 from > >x32-4.7.2-release-posix-sjlj-rev8 > to >x32-4.8.0-release-posix-dwarf-rev1 > > The recommended 64 bit toolchain would change accord

Re: [Development] Taking the new download system into production

2013-04-11 Thread Turunen Tuukka
Hi, >From what we have seen the new download.qt-project.org works well. Have you had any problems? How was the download speed? Corrupted packages (more than usual)? I would like to discontinue the old CDN as soon as we are sure the new system is working well (as it now seems to be). PS. Torr

[Development] Visual Studio Add-In 1.2.1 for Qt 5 Released

2013-04-11 Thread Turunen Tuukka
Hi All, Visual Studio Add-In 1.2.1 for Qt 5 is now released, see: http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2013/04/11/visual-studio-add-in-1-2-1-for-qt-5-released/ Yours, -- Tuukka Turunen Director, R&D Digia, Qt Address: Piippukatu 11, 40100 Jyväskylä, FINLAND Email: tuukka.turu...@digia.com Mo

Re: [Development] Taking the new download system into production

2013-04-11 Thread Tomasz Siekierda
On 5 April 2013 16:01, Turunen Tuukka wrote: [..] > We > are also looking into leveraging torrents as an additional way of > downloading files. > > I hope we continue to receive more mirrors for Qt Project in the coming > weeks. If you are interested in mirroring Qt, see instructions how to become

Re: [Development] qt-5.0.1 incorrect ..._install_prefix cmake vars ?

2013-04-11 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 17:35:19 Rex Dieter wrote: > > Please try the attached instead. I can't update the patch in gerrit until > > it finishes integrating. > > confirmed, test passes now. thanks again. Great. If you do run the tests from the build tree during packaging before installatio