On 26/03/2013, at 1:30 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 25 de março de 2013 10.46.50, Sergio Ahumada wrote:
>> Next step is to get qt5.git updated and add qtquickcontrols, qtsensors,
>> qtserialport and qtx11extras to it.
>
> Shouldn't we do an API review on those before we add t
I am trying to install the qwt plugin for the i.mx6. I noticed that I need
the designer binary to build qwt. I was just wondering what module do I have
to build in order to install the designer binary?
Thanks for your help,
Alexander Keller
___
On Friday, April 05, 2013 10:35:33 AM John Ehresman wrote:
> On 3/19/13 2:49 PM, Hugo Parente Lima wrote:
> > Following what's described on Qt Governance Model I'm sending this
> > e-mail to step down as maintainer of PySide and to propose/nominate
> > new approvers and a new maintaner. ... Before
On 3/19/13 2:49 PM, Hugo Parente Lima wrote:
> Following what's described on Qt Governance Model I'm sending this
> e-mail to step down as maintainer of PySide and to propose/nominate
> new approvers and a new maintaner. ... Before quit I would like to
> propose John Ehresman as the new maintainer
Hi,
We have already ten mirrors from three continents active for the new download
service of the Qt Project, and more are on their way. With the new MirrorBrain
based setup is it very easy to become a mirror for Qt - and even more
importantly it is seamless for the user to benefit from the nea
On 4/5/13 12:45 PM, "Axel Waggershauser" wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Axel Waggershauser
>wrote:
>>> Based on that and without an answer from Oswald which revision is
>>> currently in preparation within the winrt branch, I'd suggest to go
>>> for the latest Chrome related branch, whi
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Axel Waggershauser wrote:
>> Based on that and without an answer from Oswald which revision is
>> currently in preparation within the winrt branch, I'd suggest to go
>> for the latest Chrome related branch, which would be chrome_m27:
>> http://code.google.com/p/ang
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Axel Waggershauser wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Axel Waggershauser wrote:
>> (I went ahead and posted a question on the ANGLE ML asking which
>> 'stable' revision they would suggest to ship with Qt 5.1.)
>
> I got the following reply on the ANGLE ML:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Axel Waggershauser wrote:
> (I went ahead and posted a question on the ANGLE ML asking which
> 'stable' revision they would suggest to ship with Qt 5.1.)
I got the following reply on the ANGLE ML:
--
Trunk is generally pretty stable unless a bunch of changes
