Someone who knows about this, could you please take a look?
The first and third warnings are scary.
qcocoawindow.mm:550:35: warning: 'NSView' may not respond to 'hasMask'
qnsview.mm:1162:60: warning: 'NSPICTPboardType' is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-
declarations]
qcocoanativeinterface.mm:190:5: war
hi,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 02:33:30PM +, Qi Liang wrote:
> I think it's important, your commits in stable branch perhaps lost
> after dev branch merged. [...]
>
to preclude further pointless panicking, i simply re-did the merge
and diffed the result.
the hunk that was already identified as l
On 21 March 2013 18:39, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quinta-feira, 21 de março de 2013 18.37.52, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
>> And have the test fail if a system-wide 8.30 / 8.31 is picked? Does
>> anyone know the situation on the CI machines? (Ubuntu ships 8.30 with
>> 12.10, CI should use 12.04, so
On Thursday 21 March 2013 17:16:36 Qi Liang wrote:
> > Merging is not an easy task. (I know it, I was doing the merge during Qt
> > 4.x times)
> > It is easy for someone unexperimented to mess up.
> > Which is why I think only experimented developer should do the merge.
>
> Not that easy like Qt 4
On quinta-feira, 21 de março de 2013 10.06.00, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> (I'm sure there was a blog, with a picture of Lars and Simon talking to the
> sysadmins, turning the Git repository live for the first time, but I can't
> find it)
Thanks to Daniel:
http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2008/09/28/qt
On quinta-feira, 21 de março de 2013 18.37.52, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> And have the test fail if a system-wide 8.30 / 8.31 is picked? Does
> anyone know the situation on the CI machines? (Ubuntu ships 8.30 with
> 12.10, CI should use 12.04, so we should be fine...)
I thought the CI system only
On 21 March 2013 16:01, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quinta-feira, 21 de março de 2013 12.03.05, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
>> Replying to myself: upgrading to 8.32 actually causes failures in
>> QString tests -- an expected failure passes (line 1165 in
>> tst_qstring.cpp), as case folding support wa
> Merging is not an easy task. (I know it, I was doing the merge during Qt 4.x
> times)
> It is easy for someone unexperimented to mess up.
> Which is why I think only experimented developer should do the merge.
Not that easy like Qt 4.x ages(we only have 1 repo, and we could do that merge
per we
On quinta-feira, 21 de março de 2013 16.12.51, Qi Liang wrote:
> > When there's a conflict the merger does not know how to resolve, the
> > merger
> > asks for help. Choosing unconditionally one side is a bad idea.
>
> I don't think the merger has enough time to do that. And under open
> governance
On Thursday 21 March 2013 16:12:51 Qi Liang wrote:
> > Let's be more clear: no commits were lost. They are all still present.
> >
> > However, due to conflicts, some changes may have been improperly resolved.
> > This is no different than any other merge, in any direction.
>
> Yes, it's "lost" be
> Let's be more clear: no commits were lost. They are all still present.
>
> However, due to conflicts, some changes may have been improperly resolved.
> This
> is no different than any other merge, in any direction.
Yes, it's "lost" because of conflict resolve. And we recorded the conflicts
in
On quinta-feira, 21 de março de 2013 14.33.30, Qi Liang wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> I think it's important, your commits in stable branch perhaps lost after dev
> branch merged. At least we found one case:
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/51722
Let's be more clear: no commits were lost. They are all
On quinta-feira, 21 de março de 2013 12.03.05, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> Replying to myself: upgrading to 8.32 actually causes failures in
> QString tests -- an expected failure passes (line 1165 in
> tst_qstring.cpp), as case folding support was finally added to PCRE.
> Although distributions pro
Hi, all,
I think it's important, your commits in stable branch perhaps lost after dev
branch merged. At least we found one case:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/51722
Before the big merge happened recently, we normally will fix some bugs in
stable branch(5.0), and they will be merged into de
We are happy to announce that Qt Creator 2.7.0 was released today.
Blog post: http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2013/03/21/qt-creator-2-7-0-released/
Download: http://releases.qt-project.org/qtcreator/2.7.0/
Best regards from the Qt Creator Team
--
Eike Ziller, Senior Software Engineer - Digia, Qt
On 20 March 2013 20:04, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
>
> PCRE 8.31 and 8.32 do indeed introduce new features as well as fix
> various bugs, so I'm a bit undecided whether it's worth including them
> in stable at this point, although slightly inclined for the inclusion
> (we won't use the new features;
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:39:57PM +0100, Shaw Andy wrote:
> i wrote:
> > so i'd like to urge everyone again to take a honest look at their
> > changes, and also at the changes of drive-by contributors who were
> > never seen again (which, btw, i should do, too ^^).
>
> Is there a group or an indi
> Sqlite (*)
done.
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#q,status:open+project:qt/qtbase+branch:stable+topic:sqlite-upgrade,n,z
Mark
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
The animation logic in the threaded renderer assumes that you block at some
point, but not necessarily not in swapBuffers(). That is what
"BufferQueuingOpenGL" means. If you are not blocking anywhere, then you will
render at max CPU and rendering many more buffers than the screen can display.
T
On 03/20/2013 07:31 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Can we please agree on cleaning the dashboards up? Or, if we've agreed, can we
> do it?
>
> My dashboard is unusable. For a few months now, I have stopped my daily look
> at the "Review Requests" section. As a result, I have missed important reviews
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Sergio Ahumada
wrote:
> On 02/06/2013 07:25 PM, Olivier Goffart wrote:
>> On Thursday 31 January 2013 07:50:32 Koehne Kai wrote:
-Original Message-
From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org
[mailto:development-bounces+kai.
21 matches
Mail list logo
