Re: [Development] [Announce] Qt 5.0

2013-03-19 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 20 de março de 2013 01.13.25, André Pönitz wrote: > Oh, and I even argue that most of the few people who consider getting > sources, but only part of them, might be better served by a bunch of > 'git clone' commands instead of actual tarballs, as they are likely > to tinker a bit b

Re: [Development] [Announce] Qt 5.0

2013-03-19 Thread André Pönitz
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 04:13:01PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > >They can be shown, provided that they appear after the split tarballs and > > >that they are a convenience for downloading and building everything. > > [...] > The online installer isn't enough or suitable for people who want to

Re: [Development] [Announce] Qt 5.0

2013-03-19 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 19 de março de 2013 22.36.03, Turunen Tuukka wrote: > >They can be shown, provided that they appear after the split tarballs and > >that > >they are a convenience for downloading and building everything. > > Instead of the download page, I would like to agree upon the way how the >

Re: [Development] [Announce] Qt 5.0

2013-03-19 Thread Turunen Tuukka
On 19.3.2013 17.20, "Thiago Macieira" wrote: >On terça-feira, 19 de março de 2013 14.55.57, Ahumada Sergio wrote: >> On 12/19/2012 04:56 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:> On quarta-feira, 19 de >> dezembro de 2012 14.07.29, List for announcements >> > regarding Qt releases and development wrote: >> >>

[Development] Stepping down as maintainer, putting new people on board.

2013-03-19 Thread Hugo Parente Lima
Hi, Following what's described on Qt Governance Model I'm sending this e-mail to step down as maintainer of PySide and to propose/nominate new approvers and a new maintaner. Me and Marcelo Lira are not working with with PySide anymore, so the better we can do is to pass the token to someone ab

Re: [Development] Qt5 Branch-Guidelines and maintaining older Qt5 version

2013-03-19 Thread Tomasz Olszak
2013/3/19 Thiago Macieira > On terça-feira, 19 de março de 2013 18.27.40, Tomasz Olszak wrote: > > > There will be an old/5.0 branch containing the state of the stable > branch > > > shortly before dev was merged into it. Whether those changes are ever > > > released > > > in a 5.0.x release will

Re: [Development] Qt5 Branch-Guidelines and maintaining older Qt5 version

2013-03-19 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 19 de março de 2013 18.27.40, Tomasz Olszak wrote: > > There will be an old/5.0 branch containing the state of the stable branch > > shortly before dev was merged into it. Whether those changes are ever > > released > > in a 5.0.x release will depend on future circumstances. Current

Re: [Development] QtMof playground repository renaming and CI activation ?

2013-03-19 Thread Sandro Andrade
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 09:11:53AM -0300, Sandro Andrade wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Sandro Andrade >> wrote: >> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen >> > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:03:4

Re: [Development] Qt5 Branch-Guidelines and maintaining older Qt5 version

2013-03-19 Thread Tomasz Olszak
2013/3/19 Thiago Macieira > On terça-feira, 19 de março de 2013 17.40.40, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > > Tirsdag 19. mars 2013 13.26.22 skrev Tomasz Olszak: > > > Hello, > > > I read this article but > > > still do not understand one aspect. > > > > >

Re: [Development] Qt5 Branch-Guidelines and maintaining older Qt5 version

2013-03-19 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 19 de março de 2013 17.40.40, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > Tirsdag 19. mars 2013 13.26.22 skrev Tomasz Olszak: > > Hello, > > I read this article but > > still do not understand one aspect. > > > > Could someone explain the process of bug

Re: [Development] Qt5 Branch-Guidelines and maintaining older Qt5 version

2013-03-19 Thread Frederik Gladhorn
Tirsdag 19. mars 2013 13.26.22 skrev Tomasz Olszak: > Hello, > I read this article but > still do not understand one aspect. > > Could someone explain the process of bug fixing (e.g. bug in QString) 5.0 > and releasing 5.0.x version after releasing 5.

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Starting preparations for Qt 5.1

2013-03-19 Thread Jake Thomas Petroules
I think we should just postpone the extras 'till 5.2, yes. QtWindowsExtras needs a ton more work - Ivan Vizir's big Windows 7 features commit is still not ready and likely won't for a while. I believe he said he is planning a second commit with more of them since thumbnail toolbars were left ou

Re: [Development] [Announce] Qt 5.0

2013-03-19 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 19 de março de 2013 14.55.57, Ahumada Sergio wrote: > On 12/19/2012 04:56 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:> On quarta-feira, 19 de > dezembro de 2012 14.07.29, List for announcements > > regarding Qt releases and development wrote: > >> Please check out my blog post post at > >> http://bl

Re: [Development] Signals/slots for class templates (Was: Evolving Qt's multithreading API)

2013-03-19 Thread Thiago Macieira
On terça-feira, 19 de março de 2013 15.02.35, Olivier Goffart wrote: > On Monday 18 March 2013 07:49:07 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > We are talking about it. > > As the one who says "-2", you are the one who is supposed to state your > objections. I did. I said I wanted to discuss this more before i

Re: [Development] [Announce] Qt 5.0

2013-03-19 Thread Ahumada Sergio
On 12/19/2012 04:56 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:> On quarta-feira, 19 de dezembro de 2012 14.07.29, List for announcements > regarding Qt releases and development wrote: >> Please check out my blog post post at >> http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2012/12/19/qt-5-0/ and the Qt Project >> (http://blog.qt

Re: [Development] QtMof playground repository renaming and CI activation ?

2013-03-19 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 09:11:53AM -0300, Sandro Andrade wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Sandro Andrade wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen > > wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:03:43PM -0300, Sandro Andrade wrote: > >>> I'm not sure whether this reques

Re: [Development] Signals/slots for class templates (Was: Evolving Qt's multithreading API)

2013-03-19 Thread Olivier Goffart
On Monday 18 March 2013 07:49:07 Thiago Macieira wrote: > We are talking about it. As the one who says "-2", you are the one who is supposed to state your objections. > Can you tell us more about the long-term plan? At first, it is an experiment to see what we can do. It can be used in appli

[Development] Qt5 Branch-Guidelines and maintaining older Qt5 version

2013-03-19 Thread Tomasz Olszak
Hello, I read this article but still do not understand one aspect. Could someone explain the process of bug fixing (e.g. bug in QString) 5.0 and releasing 5.0.x version after releasing 5.1.0 version on release branch? I suppose that either I don't hav

Re: [Development] QtMof playground repository renaming and CI activation ?

2013-03-19 Thread Sandro Andrade
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Sandro Andrade wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen > wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:03:43PM -0300, Sandro Andrade wrote: >>> I'm not sure whether this request is actually feasible but would we >>> have too much impact if we rename q

Re: [Development] Qt for iOS - iOSStyle

2013-03-19 Thread Mediator Software
On 2013/03/19 1:57 AM, Jake Thomas Petroules wrote: > > Not every app should be styled native. Not every app should be styled custom. > Some should use a combination of both. It all depends on what's appropriate > for the situation at hand. All I'm asking is that people recognize that we > need >

Re: [Development] [Releasing] Starting preparations for Qt 5.1

2013-03-19 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Monday, March 18, 2013 10:36:27 Thiago Macieira wrote: > I know of only the QUrlPathInfo and the timezone features, plus minor API > changes, for QtCore. The former is something that had been lost in my large > dashboard until last week, and John's changes were too big to review while > I was