On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> -Matches expectations from C++ users a little better
> >
> >
> > What do you mean by this? I personally prefer that the enum is getting
> > strongly typed with C++11.On the conrary, I have always used int enums in
> >
Download at:
http://macieira.org/qtchooser/
Changelog:
Frederik Gladhorn (3):
Make bash script work
Make messages slightly nicer.
Warn about recursive calls
Shawn Rutledge (1):
Expand leading tilde in tool path (for e.g. ~/dev/qt5)
Thiago Macieira (10):
Add
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> -Matches expectations from C++ users a little better
>>
>
> What do you mean by this? I personally prefer that the enum is getting
> strongly typed with C++11. On t
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote:
> -Matches expectations from C++ users a little better
>
What do you mean by this? I personally prefer that the enum is getting
strongly typed with C++11. On the conrary, I have always used int enums in
QML applications.
L
I'd like to make a slight change to enum property behavior in QML.
Currently you get a compile error if you assign an int to an enum
property, similar to the warning you'll get in C++ if you do the same.
However in C++ you can easily work around this by casting it to the
enum, or just ignoring the
I was asked to look into the CI failures caused by the QSslSocket
tests (QTBUG-29941), but unfortunately doing so has shown we have a
wider problem. My old network test server was no longer working
(probably due to the move from nokia to digia) so I tried so setup a
new one and it turns out that th
On terça-feira, 5 de março de 2013 10.11.21, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > Yes.
>
> No.
>
> If you do that, there is even a qWarning telling you there will be a race:
> http://code.woboq.org/qt5/qtbase/src/corelib/thread/qfuturewatcher.cpp.html#
> _ZN18QFutureWatcherBase13connectNotifyERK11QMetaMethod
On 5 March 2013 16:46, Oleg Shalnev wrote:
> Does anyone know about of plans for official Qt5 release for android
> platform.
Qt 5.1 will sport a preview version, AFAIK. You can test it already by
checking out newest sources from git. Same goes for iOS port.
__
Good day.
Sorry for my question here.
Does anyone know about of plans for official Qt5 release for android
platform.
Thanks a lot
--
Oleg Shalnev (Kalpa Project)
--
mailto: o...@kalpa.ru
skype: oleg_shalnev
jabber: oleg.shal...@gmail.com
___
Hi!
>From time to time I'll be informing you, the community, about what's happening
>here at the CI. These posts will be informal and hopefully just give you some
>kind of idea what we are working on. Suggestions on what we should change and
>open discussion over the CI topic is encouraged.
I
On Monday 04 March 2013 23:56:35 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On terça-feira, 5 de março de 2013 08.54.35, André Somers wrote:
> > Op 5-3-2013 8:41, Thiago Macieira schreef:
> > > On terça-feira, 5 de março de 2013 08.38.17, André Somers wrote:
> > >> I'd appreciate a reply on the point that when using
On 03/05/2013 09:35 AM, Robin Burchell wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Dominik Holland
> wrote:
>> Yes this makes sense and it's similar to my solution... But why do you
>> need to multiply it with 0.9 ?
> To start fetching (hopefully) before the data is really needed. Models
> may involv
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Dominik Holland
wrote:
> Yes this makes sense and it's similar to my solution... But why do you
> need to multiply it with 0.9 ?
To start fetching (hopefully) before the data is really needed. Models
may involve asynchronous access (network etc) which might take a
13 matches
Mail list logo
