On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:47 PM, Shaw Andy wrote:
> Before the transition to Qt being developed in the open via open governance,
> the Qt Support team back in Trolltech and later Nokia, would prioritize the
> bugs that were created, or at least handled, by them. Typically these would
> be bugs
I'm working on adding support in QT5 for a new OpenSSL API supporting TLS
Authorization Extensions (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5878) and would
appreciate guidance on how to best expose this API, as it will only be
available in the very latest versions of OpenSSL.
I also would also appreciate
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:22:16PM -0500, Jake Thomas Petroules wrote:
> So right now we've got:
>
> qtwinextras: qt/dev
> qtmacextras: playground/master
> qtx11extras: qt/master
>
> I take it qtx11extras is pretty much "finished", so that makes sense. And
> seeing from the past discussion, qtwi
So right now we've got:
qtwinextras: qt/dev
qtmacextras: playground/master
qtx11extras: qt/master
I take it qtx11extras is pretty much "finished", so that makes sense. And
seeing from the past discussion, qtwinextras being in qt on dev makes sense.
But now qtmacextras is sticking out like a sor
moin,
another one from the "could have done this much earlier" ...
everyone has a personal namespace under refs/personal/$user/ in every
repository hosted on our gerrit. it's possible to create arbitrary
branch hierarchies in there. note that the branches are readable by
everyone, but writable on
2013/2/15 Stephen Kelly :
> On Friday, February 15, 2013 12:28:32 Timo Jyrinki wrote:
>> At least qtpim, qtsystems, qtconnectivity, qtfeedback
>> and qtwayland will follow later, and I'll be filing change proposals
>> for them at that time as part of the process.
>
> I don't know why you're packagi
[snip]
> > What I would like to suggest that we do now is bring back this practice, so
> that the Qt Support team will set a priority on the bugs that it creates or
> handles, so that it makes things easier for the maintainers to actually see
> what issues are potentially a higher priority than th
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 4:47 AM, Shaw Andy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Before the transition to Qt being developed in the open via open governance,
> the Qt Support team back in Trolltech and later Nokia, would prioritize the
> bugs that were created, or at least handled, by them. Typically these would
>
Hi,
Before the transition to Qt being developed in the open via open governance,
the Qt Support team back in Trolltech and later Nokia, would prioritize the
bugs that were created, or at least handled, by them. Typically these would be
bugs that were brought to our attention by commercial custo
On 2/15/13 1:06 PM, "Stephen Kelly" wrote:
>On Friday, February 15, 2013 11:52:40 Paul Olav Tvete wrote:
>> On Friday 15 February 2013 11:43:10 Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> > On Friday, February 15, 2013 12:28:32 Timo Jyrinki wrote:
>> > > At least qtpim, qtsystems, qtconnectivity, qtfeedback
>> > > a
On Friday, February 15, 2013 11:52:40 Paul Olav Tvete wrote:
> On Friday 15 February 2013 11:43:10 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > On Friday, February 15, 2013 12:28:32 Timo Jyrinki wrote:
> > > At least qtpim, qtsystems, qtconnectivity, qtfeedback
> > > and qtwayland will follow later, and I'll be filing
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> There is also a well documented and "robust" solution for that, too.
>
I meant "workaround" for sure. :-)
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen <
oswald.buddenha...@digia.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:00:35AM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen <
> oswald.buddenha...@digia.com> wrote:
> >
> > > - as we know, gerrit is too limited
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:00:35AM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen
> wrote:
>
> > - as we know, gerrit is too limited to actually allow it
>
> Actually, this will be pretty simple after the gerrit update.
>
i'll call it "pretty simple" when ther
On 02/15/2013 12:43 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
On Friday, February 15, 2013 12:28:32 Timo Jyrinki wrote:
At least qtpim, qtsystems, qtconnectivity, qtfeedback
and qtwayland will follow later, and I'll be filing change proposals
for them at that time as part of the process.
I don't know why you're
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Rutledge Shawn
wrote:
>
> Why does that mean Ubuntu packages are a bad idea? There are other
> unstable Linux libraries that people nevertheless make good use of.
I agree.
It was a good helper for instance I made QtSerialPort packages about a year
ago, but it
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen <
oswald.buddenha...@digia.com> wrote:
> - as we know, gerrit is too limited to actually allow it
Actually, this will be pretty simple after the gerrit update.
Laszlo
___
Development mailing list
De
On 15 Feb 2013, at 11:43 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Friday, February 15, 2013 12:28:32 Timo Jyrinki wrote:
>> At least qtpim, qtsystems, qtconnectivity, qtfeedback
>> and qtwayland will follow later, and I'll be filing change proposals
>> for them at that time as part of the process.
>
> I d
On Friday 15 February 2013 11:43:10 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Friday, February 15, 2013 12:28:32 Timo Jyrinki wrote:
> > At least qtpim, qtsystems, qtconnectivity, qtfeedback
> > and qtwayland will follow later, and I'll be filing change proposals
> > for them at that time as part of the process.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+simo.falt=digia@qt-project.org
> [mailto:development-bounces+simo.falt=digia@qt-project.org] On
> Behalf Of Oswald Buddenhagen
> Sent: 15. helmikuuta 2013 12:14
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] QtWindowsEx
On Friday, February 15, 2013 12:28:32 Timo Jyrinki wrote:
> At least qtpim, qtsystems, qtconnectivity, qtfeedback
> and qtwayland will follow later, and I'll be filing change proposals
> for them at that time as part of the process.
I don't know why you're packaging those.
You understand that t
2013/2/14 Jason McDonald :
> I've +2'd those changes, except qtactiveqt, which seems to need a copy
> of the LICENSE.FDL.
Thanks, and that qtactiveqt was also fixed.
>> The modules not part of official releases should also be updated at some
>> point.
>
> Do you have time to do that? If so, fee
On 2/15/13 11:13 AM, "Oswald Buddenhagen"
wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:01:31PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Knoll Lars
>>wrote:
>> > Well, I already gave that my approval some days ago in another thread.
>> >
>> > I've now created the repository.
>> > ssh
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:01:31PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Knoll Lars wrote:
> > Well, I already gave that my approval some days ago in another thread.
> >
> > I've now created the repository.
> > ssh://codereview.qt-project.org:29418/qt/qtwinextras.git.
> >
eh
Hi,
IIRC libs are defined in the LIBS qmake variable. You can define your own
set of libs using LIBS= instead of appending stuff with LIBS+=
I hope this can help you.
Cheers,
Antonio
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Mumtaz Ahmad wrote:
> I have made specs file for my environment but when i
25 matches
Mail list logo
