On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Knoll Lars wrote:
> Well, I already gave that my approval some days ago in another thread.
>
> I've now created the repository.
> ssh://codereview.qt-project.org:29418/qt/qtwinextras.git.
>
Lars, just double checking for making sure: you meant to create
qt/qtwine
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Ivan Vizir wrote:
> I thought I could finish module following Qt module guidelines and then
> propose it for review, but if you want to see Qt Windows Extras as a part
> of Qt 5.1, we could move it to Qt Playground and work on it together.
>
Lars has just created
Thank you, Lars!
Jake Petroules
Petroules Corporation (www.petroules.com)
Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com
Telephone: +1 (970) 587-3821
On Feb 14, 2013, at 4:16 PM, Knoll Lars wrote:
> Well, I already gave that my approval some days ago in another thread.
>
> I've now created the repository
Well, I already gave that my approval some days ago in another thread.
I've now created the repository.
ssh://codereview.qt-project.org:29418/qt/qtwinextras.git.
Cheers,
Lars
On 2/14/13 9:23 PM, "Jake Thomas Petroules"
wrote:
>Ah, I see.
>I've only recently started contributing to the Qt Proje
Ah, I see.
I've only recently started contributing to the Qt Project so I'm not familiar
with everything yet. Sorry about that!
Jake Petroules
Petroules Corporation (www.petroules.com)
Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com
Telephone: +1 (970) 587-3821
On Feb 14, 2013, at 3:20 PM, Laszlo Papp wro
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Jake Thomas Petroules <
jake.petrou...@petroules.com> wrote:
> I was under the impression we were already waiting for step 4 since there
> have been a decent number of messages on the mailing list regarding this
> proposal, and everyone seems to know what the modul
I was under the impression we were already waiting for step 4 since there have
been a decent number of messages on the mailing list regarding this proposal,
and everyone seems to know what the module is for and why we need it. Anyways,
is this what you want?
Request for new playground module fo
On 14 February 2013 19:21, Lorn Potter wrote:
> Back long ago
> https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-71
> (feel free to assign that one to yourself!)
> :)
Will do :-)
> I was working on porting qtopia's timezone class to qt.
> I added full windows <> olsen conversion. It was able to
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 09:42:05PM +1000, Joseph Crowell wrote:
> On 02/14/2013 05:58 AM, André Pönitz wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:08:31AM +0100, Friedemann Kleint wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> we also plan to start Qt Windows Extras to bring at least the missing
> >> image conversion functi
On 14/02/13 04:37, John Layt wrote:
> On 13 February 2013 15:13, Koehne Kai wrote:
>
>> Which parts of the ICU data are you using (from
>> http://apps.icu-project.org/datacustom/ ) ?
>> I'd really like us to strip down the default ICU libs on windows for 5.1 ...
>
> Good question. I think the f
Please read the rules (and follow in the future):
http://qt-project.org/wiki/Creating-a-new-module-or-tool-for-Qt
Seems, no maintainer gave a +1 yet. You need to get one first. :-)
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Jake Thomas Petroules <
jake.petrou...@petroules.com> wrote:
> As many OS/WM utili
I would certainly like to see that contributed to playground so that all
interested parties may contribute. Any timeframe on when someone can get the
repository created?
Jake Petroules
Petroules Corporation (www.petroules.com)
Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com
Telephone: +1 (970) 587-3821
On
I have made specs file for my environment but when i build my application i
find unwanted libs like -lcomdlg32 -loleaut32 -limm in my link command. How
i can control from qmake.conf?
-lQt5Gui -lcomdlg32 -loleaut32 -limm32 -lwinmm -llibEGL -llibGLESv2 -lgdi32
-lQt5Core -lole32 -luuid -lws2_32 -ladv
There is one here, too: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47371
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Jason McDonald wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Timo Jyrinki
> wrote:
> > 2013/2/8 Thiago Macieira :
> >>> I'd like to raise awareness that all modules and tarballs should be
> >>> s
On 02/14/2013 12:11 PM, Poenitz Andre wrote:
> Rodal Samuel wrote:
>> On 02/14/2013 10:39 AM, Poenitz Andre wrote:
>>> Samuel Rødal wrote:
What use is a QPlatformPixmapHandle having per-platform typedefs
(xcb_pixmap_t, HDC, etc) without #ifdefs to manipulate it using native
code in t
On 02/14/2013 05:58 AM, André Pönitz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:08:31AM +0100, Friedemann Kleint wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we also plan to start Qt Windows Extras to bring at least the missing
>> image conversion functions ( QTBUG-27103 ) back provided we can find
>> someone to create the repos
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:23 PM, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
> 2013/2/8 Thiago Macieira :
>>> I'd like to raise awareness that all modules and tarballs should be
>>> shipping the LICENSE files required by the (L)GPL licenses. Currently
>>> only qtbase is including the files. This is a license terms blocker
Rodal Samuel wrote:
>On 02/14/2013 10:39 AM, Poenitz Andre wrote:
>> Samuel Rødal wrote:
>>> What use is a QPlatformPixmapHandle having per-platform typedefs
>>> (xcb_pixmap_t, HDC, etc) without #ifdefs to manipulate it using native
>>> code in the first place?
>>>
>>> Can you give a platform-indep
On 02/14/2013 10:39 AM, Poenitz Andre wrote:
> Samuel Rødal wrote:
>> What use is a QPlatformPixmapHandle having per-platform typedefs
>> (xcb_pixmap_t, HDC, etc) without #ifdefs to manipulate it using native
>> code in the first place?
>>
>> Can you give a platform-independent example use case? :)
> Since the Window frame in Windows is owned by the application, how about the possibility of customising the appearance of the Window frame? Or being able to catch the window events associated with window frames like minimize, maximize clicks so I would write my own cusom window frames. Just forg
Samuel Rødal wrote:
> What use is a QPlatformPixmapHandle having per-platform typedefs
> (xcb_pixmap_t, HDC, etc) without #ifdefs to manipulate it using native
> code in the first place?
>
> Can you give a platform-independent example use case? :)
It helps reducing the amount of user code within
On 02/14/2013 05:58 PM, Ivan Vizir wrote:
Hello,
There're no problems with Qt Windows Extras. As I said somewhen in
January, I plan to contribute to Qt my code, when it's done. Current
results you can see at http://github.com/dtf/QtWindowsExtras .
For now features what are ready are:
--- progr
On 02/13/2013 08:58 PM, André Pönitz wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:08:31AM +0100, Friedemann Kleint wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we also plan to start Qt Windows Extras to bring at least the missing
>> image conversion functions ( QTBUG-27103 ) back provided we can find
>> someone to create the repos
23 matches
Mail list logo
