Depends on the type of the question. If it is more usage oriented then the
interest mailing list (or #qt on IRC @ freenode), but if it is more about
the development of it, then this list (or #qt-labs on IRC @ freenode).
Used to be a dedicated qt3d list, but perhaps it is not worth migrating to
the
I think you are looking for:
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/interest
Jake Petroules
Petroules Corporation (www.petroules.com)
Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com
Telephone: +1 (970) 587-3821
On Feb 11, 2013, at 6:33 PM, Federico J. Fernández
wrote:
> All,
>
> I want to know wha
All,
I want to know what is the best place to ask questions about the Qt3D
library.
Probably the best resource is not this list, but I couldn't find another
more specific mailing list.
Thanks.
--
federico
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-pr
Hello all,
I'm thinking of a global calendar support including Julian (as base),
Gregorian, Hebrew (jewish), Hijri (Islamic) and Jalali (Persian).
I know there's already discussions on localizations in Qt but I believe the
calendar system isn't just limited to locales but it's a feature that shou
Hi,
We have a disagreement on how to integrate the Android port into Qt
which we need to get resolved.
Here's the discussion:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,47480
tl;dr: Should we merge or rebase the Android branch when integrating it
into Qt mainline?
The main issue originat
On 02/08/2013 09:51 AM, Illya Kovalevskyy wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I found one Google thing, a useful thing -
> http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2013/01/c-containers-that-save-memory-and-time.html.
> According to benchmarks: they are faster than STL containers.
For some use cases. As they note if
Hi Illya,
I think it is an interesting idea to try B-Trees as an alternative to other
search trees for in-memory data structures. As with any data structure, you
have to consider the circumstances in which they perform better than an
alternative. These days, caches are so large and DRAM latency
On Feb 7, 2013, at 1:42 PM, Sergei Nevdakh wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I haven't found any defininions of old platform defines Q_WS_MAC, Q_WS_WIN
> in Qt5 sources, but these defines are still used in Qt itself.
> Is it ok?
You are correct that those are not in use. They will be replaced with Q_OS_*
ve
On Friday 08 February 2013 10:51:14 Illya Kovalevskyy wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I found one Google thing, a useful thing -
> http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2013/01/c-containers-that-save-memory->
> and-time.html. According to benchmarks: they are faster than STL containers.
>
> Afaik, Qt uses S
Not yet.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Raja, Kushal <
kushal.r...@imagingsciences.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ** **
>
> I’m new to Qt and trying to use Test Driven Development for Qt project. Is
> it possible to create mock objects for abstract classes? Let’s say I have
> an interface class to
Hello.
I found one Google thing, a useful thing -
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2013/01/c-containers-that-save-memory-and-time.html.
According to benchmarks: they are faster than STL containers.
Afaik, Qt uses STL containers in its QVector, QMap, etc. Maybe it's a good
idea to port it to
Hi!
I haven't found any defininions of old platform defines Q_WS_MAC, Q_WS_WIN
in Qt5 sources, but these defines are still used in Qt itself.
Is it ok?
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/d
Hi,
the Qt5 code coverage report is displaying now the code coverage report of the
modifications since Qt5.0.0.
So for QtBase 3 reports are now online:
The actual coverage report of the master branch (computed on a daily basis)
The code coverage of Qt5.0.0 (never updated)
The code coverage of th
Hi,
Sorry for the late response...
Thanks a lot for all your support! It's a real pleasure to work with you
guys :)
- Orgad
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Tobias Hunger wrote:
> Hello everybody!
>
> I proposed Orgad Shaneh for maintainer in November already, so everybody
> had enough time t
On Jan 21, 2013, at 2:36 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Yes. But note that the user does not have to do anything special in order to
> put the container in a QVariant.
> Not needed at all.
*That* is what I didn't understand -- and I don't see any notion of that in the
QMetaType docs, but that's
Hi,
I'm new to Qt and trying to use Test Driven Development for Qt project. Is it
possible to create mock objects for abstract classes? Let's say I have an
interface class to connect to database and implementations for various
database. Is it possible to mock interface class causing function to
As we have a QtMacExtras and QtX11Extras, could someone please create a
QtWindowsExtras as well?
Jake Petroules
Petroules Corporation (www.petroules.com)
Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com
Telephone: +1 (970) 587-3821
___
Development mailing list
Deve
17 matches
Mail list logo
