Re: [Development] [Announce] Qt 5.0.1 released

Le 05/02/2013 16:02, Thiago Macieira a écrit : > On terça-feira, 5 de fevereiro de 2013 09.34.54, Yves Bailly wrote: >> A segmentation fault... stack trace: >> >> 0load qgenericatomic.h98 0x40d87f >> 1QBasicAtomicInteger::load qbasicatomic.h 145 0x40d87f >> 2QtP

[Development] SSL Certificate verification overriding !!

Hello Qt folks, I'm finding the way to override the QNetwork's SSL peer certificate verification. Is it possible to do that? The reason for overriding the verification is to use my own current-time function instead of *gettimeofday *. Any help is greatly appreciated!! Kind Regards, -- *Arunpra

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

On terça-feira, 5 de fevereiro de 2013 11.33.29, Paul Olav Tvete wrote: > M config.tests/qpa/linuxfb/linuxfb.cpp > M config.tests/unix/arch.test +2 up to here. > M config.tests/unix/compile.test This one has superfluous changes. It sets a QMAKE variable that is not used anywher

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

I agreed with Simon's initial pragmatic heads up which was that: linux* blocks in existing qmake profile files would probably want be the primary code path you would want to be followed in/under Android, in the initial compilation/porting to Android. It wasn't an attempt at bike shedding. The Qt

Re: [Development] QPaint painting via Qml or v8

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Oleg Shalnev wrote: > Good day. > > Let me ask a question. Not that you're forbidden to ask, but questions on how to use Qt and QML generally go to the inter...@qt-project.org list. > I found an example for creating plugin for Qml to painting custom user > interfac

Re: [Development] CI system is temporarily down

On terça-feira, 5 de fevereiro de 2013 07.36.55, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On terça-feira, 5 de fevereiro de 2013 16.21.17, Thomas McGuire wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tuesday 05 February 2013 12:58:21 Fält Simo wrote: > > > Huh, > > > CI is up and running normally again. > > > > I am getting weird err

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

[snip] According to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_(operating_system) "Android is a Linux-based operating system ..." but on the same page says: "Android does not have a native X Window System by default nor does it support the full set of standard GNU libraries, and this makes it difficult

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

>  > > 05.02.2013, 16:10, "Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt" > : >>  Technically I don't think Android is considered a Linux-distribution. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_distribution > > "A Linux distribution ... is a member of the family of Unix-like operating > systems built on top of the

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

05.02.2013, 16:10, "Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt" : > Technically I don't think Android is considered a Linux-distribution. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_distribution "A Linux distribution ... is a member of the family of Unix-like operating systems built on top of the Linux kernel." Andr

Re: [Development] CI system is temporarily down

On terça-feira, 5 de fevereiro de 2013 16.21.17, Thomas McGuire wrote: > Hi, > > On Tuesday 05 February 2013 12:58:21 Fält Simo wrote: > > Huh, > > CI is up and running normally again. > > I am getting weird errors when trying to get a QtSensors patch merged: A > crash on exit of the unit test, wit

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

On terça-feira, 5 de fevereiro de 2013 13.10.21, Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt wrote: > Technically I don't think Android is considered a Linux-distribution. > Wouldn't this be similar to renaming the OSX mkspec to "macx-g++-darwin"? darwin-g++-aqua -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com

Re: [Development] [Announce] Qt 5.0.1 released

On terça-feira, 5 de fevereiro de 2013 09.34.54, Yves Bailly wrote: > A segmentation fault... stack trace: > > 0 load qgenericatomic.h98 0x40d87f > 1 QBasicAtomicInteger::load qbasicatomic.h 145 0x40d87f > 2 QtPrivate::RefCount::isShared qrefcount.h 99

Re: [Development] Qt Hebrew

On terça-feira, 5 de fevereiro de 2013 11.19.39, Diego Iastrubni wrote: > Note that Qt3 had a very good support for Arabic/Hebrew/Farse (RTL in > general). I still remember sitting with Lars back in 2003 in (crap forgot > where in Germany that aKademy was...). It was in a nice place called Nové H

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

On 02/06/2013 04:07 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote: On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Jake Thomas Petroules mailto:jake.petrou...@petroules.com>> wrote: Surely you meant darwin-g++-macx. :) I don't think the Android mkspec warrants having Linux in it simply because it's such a radically diff

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Jake Thomas Petroules < jake.petrou...@petroules.com> wrote: > Surely you meant darwin-g++-macx. :) > > I don't think the Android mkspec warrants having Linux in it simply > because it's such a radically different system in many ways. Custom C++ > library, different

Re: [Development] QString toLower() example -> "Qt by NOKIA"

Tirsdag 5. februar 2013 17.55.29 skrev Tony Van Eerd: > might want to change the toLower() docs: > > QString str = "Qt by NOKIA"; > str = str.toLower();// str == "qt by nokia" > > http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.0/qtcore/qstring.html#toLower Done. https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

Surely you meant darwin-g++-macx. :) I don't think the Android mkspec warrants having Linux in it simply because it's such a radically different system in many ways. Custom C++ library, different executable format, custom packaging tools, custom UI stack, the fact that native apps can't even be

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

[..] > Simply put: Consistency. We do have linux-g++-maemo, linux-g++, linux-arm- > gnueabi-g++ > > They're all flavours of Linux, following the os-compiler/variant pattern. > There's no guarantee about what system libraries are in there. In that sense > I > feel Android is a variant of Linux.

[Development] QString toLower() example -> "Qt by NOKIA"

might want to change the toLower() docs: QString str = "Qt by NOKIA"; str = str.toLower();// str == "qt by nokia" http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.0/qtcore/qstring.html#toLower - This transmission (including any attachme

Re: [Development] CI system is temporarily down

Hi, On Tuesday 05 February 2013 12:58:21 Fält Simo wrote: > Huh, > CI is up and running normally again. I am getting weird errors when trying to get a QtSensors patch merged: A crash on exit of the unit test, with an assert: ASSERT: "lib->pHnd" in file plugin/qlibrary.cpp, line 376 The patch i

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

On 2/5/13 1:21 PM, "BogDan" wrote: >Hi, > >[...] >> - Nokia is also mentioned along with names of former employees in the >>json style > >> parser under widgets/styles. Btw, I am generally wondering about it, >>it seems >> to add a new Json parser. Could it be replaced by the Json classes of

Re: [Development] ICU and Windows

04.02.2013, 18:37, "Koehne Kai" : > Hi, > > Importing ICU into qtbase is fine with me. Anyhow, I don't particular like > hard dependency to ICU from Qt5Core, since it forces everyone deploying a > Windows helloworld to also ship icudt49.dll with 17,5 MB (!). Note that it's possible to exclude

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

On 02/05/2013 02:15 PM, David Faure wrote: > . > Looking at the patch with git diff origin/dev...origin/wip/android > [not very convenient for commenting on code changes...] > > I see changes that are unrelated to android: I've tried to separate the non-android-specific changes we inherited from

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

On Tuesday 05 February 2013 11:33:29 Paul Olav Tvete wrote: > One of the major features for Qt 5.1 is Android support. We have been > doing the work in a feature branch, and are now getting ready to > integrate to the dev branch. To beat the rush of integrations before > feature freeze, we aim to

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

On Tuesday 05 February 2013 11:33:29 Paul Olav Tvete wrote: > To see the changes, check out (or diff against) the > "wip/android" branch. Looking at the patch with git diff origin/dev...origin/wip/android [not very convenient for commenting on code changes...] I see changes that are unrelated to

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

Hi, On Tuesday 05 February 2013 11:33:29 Paul Olav Tvete wrote: > One of the major features for Qt 5.1 is Android support. We have been > doing the work in a feature branch, and are now getting ready to > integrate to the dev branch. To beat the rush of integrations before > feature freeze, we ai

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 04:17:42 AM BogDan wrote: > > On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 02:58:47 AM BogDan wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> > On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 11:33:29 AM Paul Olav Tvete wrote: > >> > [...] > >> > > >> >> mkspecs/android-g++/qmake.conf > >> >> > >> > One suggesti

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 01:10:21 PM Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt wrote: > On 02/05/2013 12:49 PM, Friedemann Kleint wrote: > > - Nokia is also mentioned along with names of former employees in the > > json style parser under widgets/styles. Btw, I am generally wondering > > about it, it seems

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

On 02/05/2013 01:21 PM, BogDan wrote: > last time when I tried Json classes of QtCore were much slower > than the "new" json parser. Because every application that uses native > look and feel must parse a json file every time when it starts, the > parsing speed is a very important factor. Chee

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

Hi, [...] > - Nokia is also mentioned along with names of former employees in the json > style  > parser under widgets/styles.  Btw, I am generally wondering about it, it > seems > to add a new Json parser. Could it be replaced by the Json classes of QtCore? >   last time when I tried Json cl

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:58 AM, BogDan wrote: > Linux is only the kernel, Sure, but that is what "linux" refers to, too. > which can be changed if Google finds a better alternative, > and is not required to build an Android application. > I agree with Simon's longer explanation. I think if

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

> On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 02:58:47 AM BogDan wrote: >> Hi, >> >> > On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 11:33:29 AM Paul Olav Tvete wrote: >> > [...] >> > >> >>  mkspecs/android-g++/qmake.conf >> > >> > One suggestion regarding the name of the mkspec: >> > >> > It's not unusual to have

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

On 02/05/2013 12:49 PM, Friedemann Kleint wrote: > - Nokia is also mentioned along with names of former employees in the > json style parser under widgets/styles. Btw, I am generally wondering > about it, it seems to add a new Json parser. Could it be replaced by > the Json classes of QtCore?

Re: [Development] CI system is temporarily down

Huh, CI is up and running normally again. The original DNS problem caused some misalignment between integrator and Jenkins but also some additional issues to some Linux nodes leading all jobs to fail. All issues are now solved and all piled up changes are being merged as fast as the system can.

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

Hi, quickly trying it out, I found: - qplatformdefs.h of Android has a Nokia License of 2009 - surely that was not intended? - Nokia is also mentioned along with names of former employees in the json style parser under widgets/styles. Btw, I am generally wondering about it, it seems to a

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 02:58:47 AM BogDan wrote: > Hi, > > > On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 11:33:29 AM Paul Olav Tvete wrote: > > [...] > > > >> mkspecs/android-g++/qmake.conf > > > > One suggestion regarding the name of the mkspec: > > > > It's not unusual to have linux* masks in .pro

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

Hi, > > On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 11:33:29 AM Paul Olav Tvete wrote: > [...] >> mkspecs/android-g++/qmake.conf > > One suggestion regarding the name of the mkspec: > > It's not unusual to have linux* masks in .pro files (at least not in WebKit > ;-) > > Would it perhaps make sense to ren

[Development] automated response

Ich bin bis einschliesslich 08.02.2013 nicht im Haus. Die Vertretung uebernimmt Herr U. Mueller. Mit freundlichen Gruessen i. A. Michael Klank Abt. VT-APL ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listin

[Development] [Announce] [CVE-2013-0254] Qt Project Security Advisory: System V shared memory segments created world-writeable

Qt Project Security Advisory Title:POSIX shared memory segments created world-writeable Tracking: CVE-2013-0254 Risk Rating: Low to Medium Platforms:Unix, including Mac OS X and Linux Modules: QtCore, QtGui, QPA plugin for XCB Versions: 5.

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Simon Hausmann wrote: > On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 11:33:29 AM Paul Olav Tvete wrote: > [...] > > mkspecs/android-g++/qmake.conf > > One suggestion regarding the name of the mkspec: > > It's not unusual to have linux* masks in .pro files (at least not in > WebKi

Re: [Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

On Tuesday, February 05, 2013 11:33:29 AM Paul Olav Tvete wrote: [...] > mkspecs/android-g++/qmake.conf One suggestion regarding the name of the mkspec: It's not unusual to have linux* masks in .pro files (at least not in WebKit ;-) Would it perhaps make sense to rename the mkspec to linux-andro

[Development] Reviews needed before android integration in two weeks

One of the major features for Qt 5.1 is Android support. We have been doing the work in a feature branch, and are now getting ready to integrate to the dev branch. To beat the rush of integrations before feature freeze, we aim to start the integration in two weeks time. Most of the changes are

Re: [Development] Nominating Alan Alpert as QtDeclarative maintainer

+1 from me as well. Alan has an excellent overview on everything going on in this module and is still actively following every aspect of its development. I also agree with Lars that we eventually will need to break this beast into smaller more manageable parts as its scope will only continue to

Re: [Development] Qt Hebrew

(I wonder why/how I missed this thread) Hi Genghis! See comments inline On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Genghis Khan wrote: > I would like to initiate a new group > called "Qt Hebrew" for Hebrew speakers, where new and potential Hebrew > speaking contributors to

Re: [Development] [Announce] Qt 5.0.1 released

Le 05/02/2013 09:08, Koehne Kai a écrit : >> The "analogclock" example doesn't start. Even if I try to create an almost- >> empty project (you know, the default, auto-generated one with a single >> QMainWindow), it doesn't start either - debug or release. >> [...] > > That's weird. For the record t

Re: [Development] [Announce] Qt 5.0.1 released

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of Yves Bailly > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 8:40 AM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] [Anno

Re: [Development] Nominating Alan Alpert as QtDeclarative maintainer

+1 Alan has done a lot of good stuff for QML so far. Looking forward to more good stuff coming :) cheers, GUnnar On Feb 4, 2013, at 6:28 PM, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Knoll Lars wrote: >> Alan has been very proactive and is probably the best