On 01/17/2013 08:17 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quinta-feira, 17 de janeiro de 2013 08.05.10, Samuel Rødal wrote:
>>> I have never heard of Uli's name before and I cannot find any email from
>>> him to this mailing list. Maybe all of the discussion on XCB was held on
>>> IRC and there was nothi
On quinta-feira, 17 de janeiro de 2013 08.05.10, Samuel Rødal wrote:
> > I have never heard of Uli's name before and I cannot find any email from
> > him to this mailing list. Maybe all of the discussion on XCB was held on
> > IRC and there was nothing relevant to post to the rest of us. Also, he
>
On 01/16/2013 05:47 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quarta-feira, 16 de janeiro de 2013 16.36.01, Robin Burchell wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to nominate Uli (psychon on IRC) for Approver status.
>>
>> Uli has some specialist knowledge that is often hard to find in any
>> appreciable quality: he kn
On 01/17/2013 04:34 AM, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:37:27AM -0800, Alan Alpert wrote:
>> I can't find the current docs, but the mobility APIs already exposed a
>> wealth of system information in the SystemInfo plugin:
>> http://doc.qt.digia.com/qtmobility/qml-systeminfo.html
Hi,
Even though I haven't accumulated many merit points in the dev list
yet, I would like to make a very short review.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> API headers:
>
> http://qt.gitorious.org/qtplayground/qtserialport/blobs/master/src/serialport/serialport.h
> http://qt.git
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Shawn Rutledge
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:37:27AM -0800, Alan Alpert wrote:
>> I can't find the current docs, but the mobility APIs already exposed a
>> wealth of system information in the SystemInfo plugin:
>> http://doc.qt.digia.com/qtmobility/qml-syste
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:37:40AM +0800, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quarta-feira, 16 de janeiro de 2013 12.34.39, Amogh Kudari wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I wanted to know whether is it possible to compile QT 4.8.2 with QPA
> > on Windows ?
>
> QPA for non-Linux systems (besides Blackberry
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:37:27AM -0800, Alan Alpert wrote:
> I can't find the current docs, but the mobility APIs already exposed a
> wealth of system information in the SystemInfo plugin:
> http://doc.qt.digia.com/qtmobility/qml-systeminfo.html . The right
> place for all this more device genera
Hello, Qt Developers.
I'm new to this list, and did not get a chance to introduce myself before these:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,42191
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,42190
I am currently porting a Mac/Pc/Linux Qt 4.8 + OpenGL + QML 1.1
application from Mac OS X 10.6.8
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Mohamed Fawzi wrote:
>
> On 16 Jan 2013, at 17:37, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Rutledge Shawn
>> wrote:
>>> On 16 Jan 2013, at 8:21 AM, Bache-Wiig Jens wrote:
>>>
True. It is exactly what we would use to
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:16 AM, Mohamed Fawzi wrote:
>
> On 16 Jan 2013, at 10:54, Thomas Hartmann wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> [...]
>>> I assume the selected content is also in the app local dir, but you
>>> have a special way to access it without tripping the selector code.
>>> Note that selector code,
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:54 AM, Thomas Hartmann
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 16/01/2013 02:23, schrieb Alan Alpert:
>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Mohamed Fawzi
>> wrote:
>>> I had a long discussion with Thomas, and we came up with yet another
>>> solution :)
>>>
>>> This is in a way closer to the
On 16 Jan 2013, at 17:37, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Rutledge Shawn
> wrote:
>> On 16 Jan 2013, at 8:21 AM, Bache-Wiig Jens wrote:
>>
>>> True. It is exactly what we would use to implement the platform selector.
>>> But it can also be more pow
On quarta-feira, 16 de janeiro de 2013 16.36.01, Robin Burchell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to nominate Uli (psychon on IRC) for Approver status.
>
> Uli has some specialist knowledge that is often hard to find in any
> appreciable quality: he knows X11. He has helped out quite a bit when
> asked w
On quarta-feira, 16 de janeiro de 2013 12.34.39, Amogh Kudari wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I wanted to know whether is it possible to compile QT 4.8.2 with QPA
> on Windows ?
QPA for non-Linux systems (besides Blackberry) is only supported in Qt 5.
There was a time, before Qt 5, that QPA actually
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Rutledge Shawn
wrote:
> On 16 Jan 2013, at 8:21 AM, Bache-Wiig Jens wrote:
>
>> True. It is exactly what we would use to implement the platform selector.
>> But it can also be more powerful than that because it makes it possible to
>> implement your own platform
On 16/01/13 17:36, Mohamed Fawzi wrote:
I am certainly not against the idea of a faster/more efficient static way of
choosing resources but it cannot depend on a predetermined directory ordering.
I believe we should rather focus the immediate efforts on a subset of the
problem, like handling m
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Robin Burchell wrote:
> :h
> ttps://codereview.qt-project.org/#dashboard,1001141
I'm incompetent and can't write mail apparently. That should be:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#dashboard,1001141
___
Development maili
Hi,
I'd like to nominate Uli (psychon on IRC) for Approver status.
Uli has some specialist knowledge that is often hard to find in any
appreciable quality: he knows X11. He has helped out quite a bit when
asked with reviewing, contributing to, and bouncing ideas off code
around the xcb plugin as
On 16 Jan 2013, at 10:28, Bache-Wiig Jens wrote:
>
> On Jan 15, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Mohamed Fawzi wrote:
>
>> In the Platform Content Selection thread some saw runtime selection as not
>> needed.
>> I disagree, as I think it could be very useful in some occasions
>> (high_res/low_res, differe
Hi David,
Onsdag 16. januar 2013 14.13.43 skrev David Faure:
> Hi Jan Arve,
>
> This test has failed the last 3 times I've been trying to merge an unrelated
> change to qtbase, and I remember seeing similar failures before too.
>
> Autotest `tst_qaccessibility' failed :(
>
> Testing tst_QAcce
Hello,
You may also add the documentation people
(https://qt-project.org/wiki/Category:Developing_Qt::Documentation)
for documentation changes.
Cheers,
Jerome P.
Documentation Engineer - Digia, Qt
Fra: development-bounces+jerome.pasion=digia@qt-projec
On 16 Jan 2013, at 10:54, Thomas Hartmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 16/01/2013 02:23, schrieb Alan Alpert:
>> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Mohamed Fawzi
>> wrote:
>>> I had a long discussion with Thomas, and we came up with yet another
>>> solution :)
>>>
>>> This is in a way closer to the in
Hi Jan Arve,
This test has failed the last 3 times I've been trying to merge an unrelated
change to qtbase, and I remember seeing similar failures before too.
Autotest `tst_qaccessibility' failed :(
Testing tst_QAccessibility
QtQA::App::TestRunner: Process exited with exit code 0xC005
On 16 Jan 2013, at 8:21 AM, Bache-Wiig Jens wrote:
> True. It is exactly what we would use to implement the platform selector. But
> it can also be more powerful than that because it makes it possible to
> implement your own platform selectors if you disagree with whatever mechanism
> we come u
On Dec 24, 2012, at 8:22 AM, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For those interested in the matter, the discussion has now moved to
> codereview.
>
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,43539 adds the QQmlApplicationEngine
> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,43540 adds the
On 16/01/13 02:43, Alan Alpert wrote:
> I was talking about just UI. For features we have existing APIs, like
> http://doc.qt.digia.com/qtmobility/qsysteminfo.html#hasFeatureSupported
> (couldn't find the Qt 5 ex-mobility docs) which could be exposed to
Not part of even Qt Essentials, so not somet
Hi,
Am 16/01/2013 02:23, schrieb Alan Alpert:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Mohamed Fawzi
> wrote:
>> I had a long discussion with Thomas, and we came up with yet another
>> solution :)
>>
>> This is in a way closer to the initial mail of Alan:
>
> Very close actually. But with better inte
On Jan 16, 2013, at 9:22 AM, Bache-Wiig Jens wrote:
>>>
>>> Second, it would be useful to know if I am on a "phone", "tablet" or
>>> "desktop" platform. ( can already guess by the resolution but perhaps it
>>> would be convenient to abstract it a bit.
>>
>> These days you can't really tell f
On 01/16/2013 09:58 AM, Sean Harmer wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 January 2013 08:12:37 Samuel Rødal wrote:
>> On 01/15/2013 05:05 PM, Sean Harmer wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 15 January 2013 16:37:38 Samuel Rødal wrote:
On 01/15/2013 02:43 PM, Sean Harmer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 07 January
On Jan 15, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Mohamed Fawzi wrote:
> In the Platform Content Selection thread some saw runtime selection as not
> needed.
> I disagree, as I think it could be very useful in some occasions
> (high_res/low_res, different orientation,…).
> I do not believe that having a separate b
On Wednesday 16 January 2013 08:12:37 Samuel Rødal wrote:
> On 01/15/2013 05:05 PM, Sean Harmer wrote:
> > On Tuesday 15 January 2013 16:37:38 Samuel Rødal wrote:
> >> On 01/15/2013 02:43 PM, Sean Harmer wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On Monday 07 January 2013 10:00:47 Sean Harmer wrote:
> On M
>>
>> Second, it would be useful to know if I am on a "phone", "tablet" or
>> "desktop" platform. ( can already guess by the resolution but perhaps it
>> would be convenient to abstract it a bit.
>
> These days you can't really tell from the resolution :) But I don't
> think Qt currently has a
33 matches
Mail list logo
