Re: [Development] Proposal: expose the OS/platform in QML

2013-01-15 Thread Robin Burchell
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Samuel Rødal wrote: > These days you can't really tell from the resolution :) But I don't > think Qt currently has a way to distinguish xcb/wayland running on a > tablet vs a desktop, or eglfs running on a phone vs a tablet. How would > a typical Android applicatio

Re: [Development] Proposal: expose the OS/platform in QML

2013-01-15 Thread Samuel Rødal
On 01/16/2013 08:21 AM, Bache-Wiig Jens wrote: > > On Jan 15, 2013, at 6:38 PM, Attila Csipa wrote: > >> On 15/01/13 18:27, Nurmi J-P wrote: >>> What do you think about exposing the underlying operating system and/or >>> platform name in QML? >>> ... >>> Which one of these proposals do you like t

Re: [Development] Proposal: expose the OS/platform in QML

2013-01-15 Thread Bache-Wiig Jens
On Jan 15, 2013, at 6:38 PM, Attila Csipa wrote: > On 15/01/13 18:27, Nurmi J-P wrote: >> What do you think about exposing the underlying operating system and/or >> platform name in QML? >> ... >> Which one of these proposals do you like the most, or are you against the >> whole idea? > > In

Re: [Development] OpenGL in Qt 5.1 and onwards

2013-01-15 Thread Samuel Rødal
On 01/15/2013 05:05 PM, Sean Harmer wrote: > On Tuesday 15 January 2013 16:37:38 Samuel Rødal wrote: >> On 01/15/2013 02:43 PM, Sean Harmer wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Monday 07 January 2013 10:00:47 Sean Harmer wrote: On Monday 07 January 2013 08:28:35 Sletta Gunnar wrote: > On Dec 18, 2012

[Development] Compile Qt-4.8.2 with QPA on windows

2013-01-15 Thread Amogh Kudari
Hi All, I wanted to know whether is it possible to compile QT 4.8.2 with QPA on Windows ? Regards, Amogh. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] Platform Content Selection

2013-01-15 Thread Alan Alpert
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Mohamed Fawzi wrote: > I had a long discussion with Thomas, and we came up with yet another solution > :) > > This is in a way closer to the initial mail of Alan: Very close actually. But with better integration for non-QML applications ;) . > 1) special place f

Re: [Development] Platform Content Selection

2013-01-15 Thread Alan Alpert
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:13 AM, Attila Csipa wrote: > On 10-Jan-13 17:26, Alan Alpert wrote: >>> The Qt >>> heritage so far was, to maximize portability level, to "test for >>> features" - something sadly currenly NOT possible in an easy way in QML. >> The Qt heritage so far was desktop, where cr

Re: [Development] Runtime Platform Content Selection

2013-01-15 Thread Alan Alpert
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Mohamed Fawzi wrote: > In the Platform Content Selection thread some saw runtime selection as not > needed. > I disagree, as I think it could be very useful in some occasions > (high_res/low_res, different orientation,…). > I do not believe that having a separate

Re: [Development] Can a device mkspec go directly into stable?

2013-01-15 Thread Donald Carr
This only makes sense; it can't destabilize affairs and to cock block yourself on potential market share seems ludicrous at best. w00t Donald On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > Tirsdag 15. januar 2013 15.01.35 skrev Rafael Roquetto: >> Hello, >> >> I have submitted the f

Re: [Development] Can a device mkspec go directly into stable?

2013-01-15 Thread Frederik Gladhorn
Tirsdag 15. januar 2013 15.01.35 skrev Rafael Roquetto: > Hello, > > I have submitted the following device mkspec for review: > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,44840 > > I am wondering if this ok that it has been submitted directly to the stable > branch. This is an orthognal* mkspec, s

Re: [Development] Proposal: expose the OS/platform in QML

2013-01-15 Thread Attila Csipa
On 15/01/13 18:27, Nurmi J-P wrote: > What do you think about exposing the underlying operating system and/or > platform name in QML? > ... > Which one of these proposals do you like the most, or are you against the > whole idea? In my eyes the real question is that comes after this one - once y

[Development] Can a device mkspec go directly into stable?

2013-01-15 Thread Rafael Roquetto
Hello, I have submitted the following device mkspec for review: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,44840 I am wondering if this ok that it has been submitted directly to the stable branch. This is an orthognal* mkspec, so I personally don't see any problems but I would like to discuss this

[Development] Proposal: expose the OS/platform in QML

2013-01-15 Thread Nurmi J-P
Hi all, What do you think about exposing the underlying operating system and/or platform name in QML? Whilst separating platform specific things to separate files (alike "platform content selection") is probably a good solution in general, it sounds a bit overkill for a project like the deskto

Re: [Development] Platform Content Selection

2013-01-15 Thread Mohamed Fawzi
I had a long discussion with Thomas, and we came up with yet another solution :) This is in a way closer to the initial mail of Alan: 1) special place for application local stuff 2) global ordered list of selectors 3) some selectors are static (probably from the make spec), other dynamic 4) 2 URL

Re: [Development] Removing QT_{BEGIN,END}_HEADER macros in Qt 5.1

2013-01-15 Thread André Pönitz
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:09:48PM +, Ahumada Sergio wrote: > Hi, > > While I was trying to mark tst_headers as significant again > I found out that I > had to add some QT_{BEGIN,END}_HEADER macros to some headers. > > After some invest

Re: [Development] OpenGL in Qt 5.1 and onwards

2013-01-15 Thread Sean Harmer
On Tuesday 15 January 2013 16:37:38 Samuel Rødal wrote: > On 01/15/2013 02:43 PM, Sean Harmer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Monday 07 January 2013 10:00:47 Sean Harmer wrote: > >> On Monday 07 January 2013 08:28:35 Sletta Gunnar wrote: > >>> On Dec 18, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Sean Harmer wrote: > Hi,

Re: [Development] OpenGL in Qt 5.1 and onwards

2013-01-15 Thread Samuel Rødal
On 01/15/2013 02:43 PM, Sean Harmer wrote: > Hi, > > On Monday 07 January 2013 10:00:47 Sean Harmer wrote: >> On Monday 07 January 2013 08:28:35 Sletta Gunnar wrote: >>> On Dec 18, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Sean Harmer wrote: Hi, I would like to start a discussion on the future level of sup

Re: [Development] QtGraphicalEffects

2013-01-15 Thread Sletta Gunnar
On Jan 15, 2013, at 2:28 PM, Thomas Senyk wrote: > Hi, > > is anyone feeling somewhat responsible for QtGraphicalEffects? Yes, I do. Feel free to add me as reviewer for anything you do there. The original author and maintainer of the project has left the Qt community, so there is nobody acti

Re: [Development] OpenGL in Qt 5.1 and onwards

2013-01-15 Thread Sean Harmer
On Tuesday 15 January 2013 15:22:45 Shawn Rutledge wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 01:43:56PM +, Sean Harmer wrote: > > Patches for a few things here... > > > > Geometry shaders: > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,44784 > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,44785 > > > > V

Re: [Development] OpenGL in Qt 5.1 and onwards

2013-01-15 Thread Shawn Rutledge
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 01:43:56PM +, Sean Harmer wrote: > Patches for a few things here... > > Geometry shaders: > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,44784 > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,44785 > > Vertex Array Objects: > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,44786 >

Re: [Development] OpenGL in Qt 5.1 and onwards

2013-01-15 Thread Sean Harmer
Hi, On Monday 07 January 2013 10:00:47 Sean Harmer wrote: > On Monday 07 January 2013 08:28:35 Sletta Gunnar wrote: > > On Dec 18, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Sean Harmer wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I would like to start a discussion on the future level of support for > > > OpenGL enablers in Qt for thos

Re: [Development] QtGraphicalEffects

2013-01-15 Thread Thomas Senyk
On Tue, January 15, 2013 14:32:52 Thomas Senyk wrote: > On Tue, January 15, 2013 13:31:18 Nichols Andy wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > > > is anyone feeling somewhat responsible for QtGraphicalEffects? > > > > I got 2 commit I would like to push. > > It's not on codereview, is it? > > > > It is: > > h

Re: [Development] Qml what for, was Platform Content Selection

2013-01-15 Thread Attila Csipa
On 15/01/13 12:22, Mohamed Fawzi wrote: > >> - Which real world problems do we address? [By "real world" I >>explicitly do include handset makers, and potential single- >>platform interest in that area, but it's definitely not >>restricted to those] > Dynamic interfaces, with transition

Re: [Development] QtGraphicalEffects

2013-01-15 Thread Thomas Senyk
On Tue, January 15, 2013 13:31:18 Nichols Andy wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > is anyone feeling somewhat responsible for QtGraphicalEffects? > > I got 2 commit I would like to push. > It's not on codereview, is it? > > It is: > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#q,project:qt/qtgraphicaleffects,n,z > >

Re: [Development] QtGraphicalEffects

2013-01-15 Thread Robin Burchell
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Thomas Senyk wrote: > is anyone feeling somewhat responsible for QtGraphicalEffects? > > I got 2 commit I would like to push. > It's not on codereview, is it? Yes, it is > (...by the way: where do I find a list of projects on codereview?) https://codereview.qt-p

Re: [Development] QtGraphicalEffects

2013-01-15 Thread Nichols Andy
Hi Thomas, is anyone feeling somewhat responsible for QtGraphicalEffects? I got 2 commit I would like to push. It's not on codereview, is it? It is: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#q,project:qt/qtgraphicaleffects,n,z (...by the way: where do I find a list of projects on codereview?) There

Re: [Development] QtGraphicalEffects

2013-01-15 Thread Richard Moore
On 15 January 2013 13:28, Thomas Senyk wrote: > Hi, > > is anyone feeling somewhat responsible for QtGraphicalEffects? > > I got 2 commit I would like to push. > It's not on codereview, is it? https://codereview.qt-project.org/#admin,project,qt/qtgraphicaleffects,info > > (...by the way: where d

[Development] QtGraphicalEffects

2013-01-15 Thread Thomas Senyk
Hi, is anyone feeling somewhat responsible for QtGraphicalEffects? I got 2 commit I would like to push. It's not on codereview, is it? (...by the way: where do I find a list of projects on codereview?) Greets Thomas ___ Development mailing list De

[Development] Runtime Platform Content Selection

2013-01-15 Thread Mohamed Fawzi
In the Platform Content Selection thread some saw runtime selection as not needed. I disagree, as I think it could be very useful in some occasions (high_res/low_res, different orientation,…). I do not believe that having a separate binary for all those things is the correct choice. Still the is

Re: [Development] ICU and Windows

2013-01-15 Thread Shaw Andy
> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+andy.shaw=digia@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+andy.shaw=digia@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of Thiago Macieira > Sent: 14. januar 2013 16:52 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] ICU and Windows

Re: [Development] Qml mime types

2013-01-15 Thread Mohamed Fawzi
If there are no other objections I will go ahead an propose this on the mime mailing list, and prepare a patch for this. As most uses are qt specific, probably we should be able to still change things without too many problems if we really see that it does not work. Fawzi On 10 Jan 2013, at 07:

[Development] Qml what for, was Platform Content Selection

2013-01-15 Thread Mohamed Fawzi
On 9 Jan 2013, at 22:30, André Pönitz wrote: > […] > A few questions that come to mind are: I think these are good provocative questions, and I will try to answer them with my personal opinion. > > - Which real world problems do we address? [By "real world" I > explicitly do include handset