Re: [Development] QtQuick1 (Qt4 and Qt5)

2012-12-27 Thread Chris Adams
Hi, The primary purpose of having QtQuick 1 in Qt5 is compatibility, that > your "import QtQuick 1.1" QML works *as before* when you switch to Qt > 5. Work on QtQuick 1.1 which is not eligible for a Qt 4 patch release > is clearly unacceptable. The question of a QtQuick 1.2 is less clear, > but

Re: [Development] QtQuick1 (Qt4 and Qt5)

2012-12-27 Thread Alan Alpert
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 4:30 AM, André Somers wrote: > Op 26-12-2012 23:33, Alan Alpert schreef: >> On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Thiago Macieira >> wrote: >>> On quarta-feira, 26 de dezembro de 2012 20.38.58, Alberto Mardegan wrote: Hi all! I've a few API additions to propose t

Re: [Development] Non-movable Qt build

2012-12-27 Thread Yves Bailly
Le 26/12/2012 19:10, Thiago Macieira a écrit : > On quarta-feira, 26 de dezembro de 2012 16.55.12, Yves Bailly wrote: >> Le 26/12/2012 16:39, Thiago Macieira a écrit : >>> On quarta-feira, 26 de dezembro de 2012 16.14.10, Yves Bailly wrote: Why not use relative paths, e.g. QT_MODULE_BIN_B

Re: [Development] QtQuick1 (Qt4 and Qt5)

2012-12-27 Thread André Somers
Op 26-12-2012 23:33, Alan Alpert schreef: > On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Thiago Macieira > wrote: >> On quarta-feira, 26 de dezembro de 2012 20.38.58, Alberto Mardegan wrote: >>> Hi all! >>> I've a few API additions to propose to the QML FolderListModel class, >>> which is present in thre