Hi,
I have commit a patch for this:
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,43312
Regards
Debao
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Konstantin Ritt wrote:
> +1 to option 2
>
> Konstantin
>
>
> 2012/12/20 1+1=2 :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > At present, if we want to setting the Application Icon under
Hi,
As per some requests, Qt Solutions has been moved to Gerrit.
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#admin,project,qt-solutions/qt-solutions,info
https://qt.gitorious.org/qt-solutions/qt-solutions will become a read-only
mirror and pending merge request will get a message that they need to be pu
On quinta-feira, 20 de dezembro de 2012 20.03.31, Sergio Ahumada wrote:
> On 12/20/2012 04:30 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > What do you think about getting a notification on the announcement
> > mailing list about add-on candidates released from the playground
> > repository? Are you
On 12/20/2012 04:30 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What do you think about getting a notification on the announcement
> mailing list about add-on candidates released from the playground
> repository? Are you interested in getting information about such modules
> in this form?
>
> Laszlo
>
Hi
On Thursday, December 20, 2012 06:46:32 PM Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 06:36:32PM +0100, Mitch Curtis wrote:
> > http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-Version-Compatibility
>
> the part about behavior compatibility makes no sense at all - it's part
> of binary compatibility. you ca
On quinta-feira, 20 de dezembro de 2012 18.46.32, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 06:36:32PM +0100, Mitch Curtis wrote:
> > http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-Version-Compatibility
>
> the part about behavior compatibility makes no sense at all - it's part
> of binary compatibility.
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 06:36:32PM +0100, Mitch Curtis wrote:
> http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-Version-Compatibility
>
the part about behavior compatibility makes no sense at all - it's part
of binary compatibility. you can change released behavior only if it is
clearly bogus, and even then be care
Hi,
I'm too +1
Best regards,
Denis
20.12.2012 21:39, Mitch Curtis ?:
On Thursday, December 20, 2012 03:30:40 PM Laszlo Papp wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What do you think about getting a notification on the announcement
mailing
> list about add-on candidates released from the playground
rep
On Thursday, December 20, 2012 03:30:40 PM Laszlo Papp wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> What do you think about getting a notification on the announcement mailing
> list about add-on candidates released from the playground repository? Are
> you interested in getting information about such modules in this fo
Hello.
I'm seeking the wisdom of Qt developers in order to improve a wiki article
that explains Qt's Behaviour/Binary/Source compatibility policy. You can find
the article here:
http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt-Version-Compatibility
If you don't have a DevNet account and believe that signing up f
+1 to option 2
Konstantin
2012/12/20 1+1=2 :
> Hi all,
>
> At present, if we want to setting the Application Icon under Windows
> platform, we should create a xxx.rc file first, then pass the file path to
> qmake variable RC_FILE. see:
>
> http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.0/qtdoc/appicon.html
>
>
Hi all,
At present, if we want to setting the Application Icon under Windows
platform, we should create a xxx.rc file first, then pass the file path to
qmake variable RC_FILE. see:
http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5.0/qtdoc/appicon.html
I hope that we can directly specify the Application Icon throug
Hi all,
What do you think about getting a notification on the announcement mailing
list about add-on candidates released from the playground repository? Are
you interested in getting information about such modules in this form?
Laszlo
___
Development ma
Hi,
After yesterday's release, we are planning to bump the Qt 5 version to
5.0.1.
The first change is https://codereview.qt-project.org/43351
I'll bump the other modules after this one is approved.
Cheers,
--
Sergio Ahumada
Release Engineer - Digia, Qt
_
> Subject: Re: [Development] Qml mime types
>
> Do I understand you correctly that you prefer my initial proposal with
> text/vnd.qt.qml at the top? or you want
> qml-base and qml as subtype?
> Assuming you meant the first option we get to
>
> text/plain; charset=utf-8
> text/vnd.qt.qml => a fil
Op 20-12-2012 12:11, Shawn Rutledge schreef:
> So ultimately at that company all the abstract actions you would have
> wanted to create would still have to be converted into gui-oriented
> actions anyway, right? How would you avoid writing code to bridge or
> augment them into actions which can
On 20 December 2012 11:51, André Somers wrote:
> Op 20-12-2012 11:40, Shawn Rutledge schreef:
>> On 19 December 2012 09:13, André Somers wrote:
>>> Well, I disagree with that view of what an action represents. To me, the
>>> core of an action really is bundling a bit of state with a trigger for
>
Am 18/12/2012 00:53, schrieb André Pönitz:
> But back to the original issue, within the intended context: The
> point is that with the existence of arbitrary imperative blobs with
> arbitrary side effects and full access to global data a language's
> claim to be "declarative" is hard to defend - b
Op 20-12-2012 11:40, Shawn Rutledge schreef:
> On 19 December 2012 09:13, André Somers wrote:
>> Well, I disagree with that view of what an action represents. To me, the
>> core of an action really is bundling a bit of state with a trigger for
>> something to happen (I try to avoid the word 'actio
Op 20-12-2012 11:10, Bache-Wiig Jens schreef:
>>> I find the idea of adding a new QCoreAction base class that is shared
>>> between QML Action and QAction and only carries a small subset of
>>> properties an unnecessary layer of abstraction. The idea of QAction is to
>>> have the convenience of
On 20/12/2012 7:33 PM, Hausmann Simon wrote:
> I think Jonathan's latest webkit fixes actually made it into the release tar
> ball.
Not all of the fixes. See towards the end of this page for the other
patches you need - http://qt-project.org/wiki/MinGW-64-bit
>> Good day!
>>
>> Just one question.
On 19 December 2012 09:13, André Somers wrote:
> Well, I disagree with that view of what an action represents. To me, the
> core of an action really is bundling a bit of state with a trigger for
> something to happen (I try to avoid the word 'action' here) in a
> convenient API. That piece of stat
On 19.12.2012, at 16:56, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quarta-feira, 19 de dezembro de 2012 14.07.29, List for announcements
> regarding Qt releases and development wrote:
>> Please check out my blog post post at
>> http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2012/12/19/qt-5-0/ and the Qt Project
>> (http://bl
+1
At least it needs to be modularized for Qt 5.
Regards,
Liang
From: development-bounces+liang.qi=digia@qt-project.org
[development-bounces+liang.qi=digia@qt-project.org] on behalf of Sletta
Gunnar [gunnar.sle...@digia.com]
Sent: Monday, Novemb
>> I find the idea of adding a new QCoreAction base class that is shared
>> between QML Action and QAction and only carries a small subset of properties
>> an unnecessary layer of abstraction. The idea of QAction is to have the
>> convenience of icons, text and shortcuts predefined for you in a
On quarta-feira, 19 de dezembro de 2012 10.50.37, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> Could you explain why it was a bad idea?
>
> It required few hacks, but that was transparent to the user.
Because:
> > It required renaming the class on Mac anyway.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
I think Jonathan's latest webkit fixes actually made it into the release tar
ball.
Simon
--
Sendt fra min Nokia N920.12.12 08:34 skrev Koehne Kai:
> Subject: [Development] Qt5 mingw official build
>
> Good day!
>
> Just one question.
>
> What about mingw official builds.
As Lars already pointe
27 matches
Mail list logo
