Re: [Development] QML Runtime

2012-12-13 Thread Koehne Kai
> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of Sorvig Morten > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 4:55 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] QML

Re: [Development] QAction-like API for QML

2012-12-13 Thread Bache-Wiig Jens
I have been lurking in the discussion a bit but I guess it is time for me to pitch in. It is hard to keep up with 10 different threads at once. :) I find the idea of adding a new QCoreAction base class that is shared between QML Action and QAction and only carries a small subset of properties an

[Development] ELF Can run much platform

2012-12-13 Thread ugiwgh
A Qt installing file can run much more linux platform. I'm very interest this. Any one can give me some tips? Any help will be appreciated. --GHui ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/develo

Re: [Development] Enumerations in QML

2012-12-13 Thread Tony Van Eerd
> -Original Message- > > I don't think it adds the real value, which comes from just matching > C++ expectations. Enums help out in C++ because they're A) > high-performance B) high-readability and C) Object-Oriented. By > putting enums in their own files as their own types we lose most of

Re: [Development] QAction-like API for QML

2012-12-13 Thread Alan Alpert
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 11:41:27 Alan Alpert wrote: >> The original Action API I proposed was approaching it as a UI logic >> element. Let's see what we come up with when we split it into UI and >> business elements >> >> CoreAction:/

Re: [Development] [Qt-creator] gerrit-speak

2012-12-13 Thread Donald Carr
+1 I have seen some people take serious issue with the phrasing; the iOS contributions spring to mind, but many people clearly feel publicly disgraced. On Dec 13, 2012 12:51 PM, "Jenssen Tim" wrote: > > Von: > qt-creator-bounces+tim.jenssen=digia@qt-

Re: [Development] [Qt-creator] gerrit-speak

2012-12-13 Thread Jenssen Tim
Von: qt-creator-bounces+tim.jenssen=digia@qt-project.org [qt-creator-bounces+tim.jenssen=digia@qt-project.org]" im Auftrag von "Cristian Tibirna [tibi...@kde.org] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2012 18:15 An: qt-crea...@qt-project.org Betreff:

Re: [Development] Enumerations in QML

2012-12-13 Thread Alan Alpert
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Erik Verbruggen wrote: > Replying to myself after a bit of pondering... > > On Dec 12, 2012, at 10:45, Verbruggen Erik wrote: > >> The problem with enums is that we couldn't make them fast. They will always >> be a lot slower than normal string literals. That is

Re: [Development] Convenience Imports in QML

2012-12-13 Thread Alan Alpert
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Lincoln Ramsay wrote: > On 13/12/12 07:12, Alan Alpert wrote: >> >> Hmm... so you're suggesting that we tie the imports for a single >> application into a single file (manageable by the build system)? That >> might work... >> >> So all the application source files

Re: [Development] Convenience Imports in QML

2012-12-13 Thread Alan Alpert
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Attila Csipa wrote: > On 12/12/12 23:01, Alan Alpert wrote: >> >> Major version means high-level incompatibilty, so if you import QtQml 2.0 >> now don't expect it to just work with QtQml 3.0. Minor version means >> features, which actually means some low-level inco

Re: [Development] Qt 5 packaging and binary renaming

2012-12-13 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 13 de dezembro de 2012 17.41.58, Stephen Kelly wrote: > On Thursday, December 13, 2012 08:16:41 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On quinta-feira, 13 de dezembro de 2012 15.04.31, Stephen Kelly wrote: > > > And if you set that path using the configure switch for it (-bindir?), > > > the >

Re: [Development] Qt 5 packaging and binary renaming

2012-12-13 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Thursday, December 13, 2012 08:16:41 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quinta-feira, 13 de dezembro de 2012 15.04.31, Stephen Kelly wrote: > > And if you set that path using the configure switch for it (-bindir?), the > > CMake files should be generated with the correct paths already without > > patch

Re: [Development] QAction-like API for QML

2012-12-13 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 11:41:27 Alan Alpert wrote: > The original Action API I proposed was approaching it as a UI logic > element. Let's see what we come up with when we split it into UI and > business elements > > CoreAction://Names are for illustrative purposes only > QtObject { //Prot

Re: [Development] Qt 5 packaging and binary renaming

2012-12-13 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 13 de dezembro de 2012 15.04.31, Stephen Kelly wrote: > And if you set that path using the configure switch for it (-bindir?), the > CMake files should be generated with the correct paths already without > patching. That is why I ask how you set the location of the mkspec files -

Re: [Development] Qt 5 packaging and binary renaming

2012-12-13 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 12 de dezembro de 2012 17.28.59, Stephen Kelly wrote: > Thaigo, if that tool is a requirement for packagers, why is it not a > release blocker for Qt 5.0? What do you expect packagers to do? It is. I plan on releasing it by the end of the week. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.maciei

Re: [Development] QML Runtime

2012-12-13 Thread Sorvig Morten
On Dec 13, 2012, at 2:06 PM, Koehne Kai wrote: > > It's there because there are different conventions on different OS where the > .qml files should be (relative to the binary). E.g. on Mac its unter > .app/Contents/Resources, on QNX it's app/native, on Android it's "assets:/" … This is a depl

[Development] Qt 5.0 RC 2 released

2012-12-13 Thread Tanilkan Sinan
Hi, We are happy to announce that the second release candidate for Qt 5.0 has just been released. More information about the release can be found in Lars' blog post: http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2012/12/13/qt-5-0-rc2-released/, at http://qt-project.org/ and on the Qt 5 wiki page: http://qt-p

Re: [Development] Qt 5 packaging and binary renaming

2012-12-13 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Thursday, December 13, 2012 13:37:16 you wrote: > On Dec 13, 2012, at 12:58 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > > The wrapper tool does not exist yet, and Qt 5.0 might be released without > > it. That'll be something for you to deal with then. :) > > I'd simply go for putting the binaries into a separa

Re: [Development] Qt 5 packaging and binary renaming

2012-12-13 Thread Knoll Lars
On Dec 13, 2012, at 12:58 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote: > On Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:50:30 Timo Jyrinki wrote: >> 2012/12/12 Stephen Kelly : >>> https://launchpad.net/~canonical-qt5-edgers/+archive/qt5-proper >> >> o/ >> >>> and finding that they were installing broken cmake files as a resul

Re: [Development] QML Runtime

2012-12-13 Thread Koehne Kai
> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of Alan Alpert > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 7:47 PM > To: Sorvig Morten > Cc: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re:

Re: [Development] Branches

2012-12-13 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:24:46PM +0100, Knoll Lars wrote: > On Dec 12, 2012, at 5:39 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen > wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 07:59:07AM -0800, Thiago Macieira wrote: > >> On quarta-feira, 12 de dezembro de 2012 14.03.52, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > >>> On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 a

Re: [Development] Qt 5 RC 2 Testing

2012-12-13 Thread Motyka Rafal
Hi, Sorry for confusion. The list of known issues: http://qt-project.org/wiki/Qt500RC2KnownIssues (will be ready soon) Regards, /Rafal Rafal Motyka QE Engineer Digia, Qt Email: rafal.mot...@digia.com Mobile: +47 95005389 http://qt.digia.com Qt Blog: ht

Re: [Development] Qt 5 RC 2 Testing

2012-12-13 Thread Motyka Rafal
Hello, There is a new version available: http://releases.qt-project.org/digia/5.0.0_rc2/backups/2012-12-13-382/ The difference between 381 and 382: - qtdeclarative examples to work in Qt Creator - showing the webkit examples in the welcome screen. The list of known issues: http://qt-project.org/

Re: [Development] Qt 5 packaging and binary renaming

2012-12-13 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:50:30 Timo Jyrinki wrote: > 2012/12/12 Stephen Kelly : > > https://launchpad.net/~canonical-qt5-edgers/+archive/qt5-proper > > o/ > > > and finding that they were installing broken cmake files as a result of > > renaming the binaries and moving the mkspecs. > >

Re: [Development] Qt 5 packaging and binary renaming

2012-12-13 Thread Timo Jyrinki
2012/12/12 Stephen Kelly : > https://launchpad.net/~canonical-qt5-edgers/+archive/qt5-proper o/ > and finding that they were installing broken cmake files as a result of > renaming the binaries and moving the mkspecs. Thanks for notifying. > So please, whether you use the wrapper tool or not,

Re: [Development] Qml mime types

2012-12-13 Thread Mohamed Fawzi
Do I understand you correctly that you prefer my initial proposal with text/vnd.qt.qml at the top? or you want qml-base and qml as subtype? Assuming you meant the first option we get to text/plain; charset=utf-8 text/vnd.qt.qml => a file written in the qml language text/vnd.qt.qtquick+qml

Re: [Development] Qml mime types

2012-12-13 Thread Mohamed Fawzi
The thinking was to register the types also in the freedesktop.org database. And Qtcreator will use that hierarchy from the beginning. About the charset I was referring to http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6657 which amends the text/* types. I am interpreting it incorrectly? Without it one has to go

Re: [Development] Enumerations in QML

2012-12-13 Thread Erik Verbruggen
Replying to myself after a bit of pondering... On Dec 12, 2012, at 10:45, Verbruggen Erik wrote: > The problem with enums is that we couldn't make them fast. They will always > be a lot slower than normal string literals. That is mostly because we could > not avoid the name lookup. Think about

Re: [Development] If you are working on documentation...

2012-12-13 Thread Smith Martin
Outlook webmail sucks. No, this is a different problem, which I am working on now, but it IS caused by modularization. QApplication, QGuiApplication, and QCoreApplication are all in different modules, but the information about inheritance is not appearing in each module's .index file. It will

Re: [Development] If you are working on documentation...

2012-12-13 Thread Alberto Mardegan
On 12/13/2012 08:51 AM, Martin Smith wrote: [...] > ...which shows that qtcore does not depend on qtconcurrent, so you can't use > \l to link FROM qtcore TO qtconcurrent. Is this the reason why the "Inherited by" information is missing or incomplete? I always found that information extremely val

[Development] Qt 5 RC 2 Testing

2012-12-13 Thread Motyka Rafal
Hello, Qt 5 RC release testing continues. We would like to kindly ask the Qt Community for help by testing RC 2 packages. 1. Installer packages are available here: http://releases.qt-project.org/digia/5.0.0_rc2/backups/2012-12-13-381/

[Development] Re: Controlling QML Imports

2012-12-13 Thread Jan Kundrát
On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 19:27:17 CEST, Alan Alpert wrote: > This doesn't completely fix the problem, because if the wrong thing is > instantiated it will still be able to do things in the period while > and just after it is instantiated. For example there could be side > effects from them in