On sábado, 8 de dezembro de 2012 09.53.44, Alan Alpert wrote:
> This thing about the non-destabilizing bug fixes is just the release
> team being cautious because we don't have a release branch yet.
> Theoretically I'd have thought the release branch should have started
> for RC1 and then the relea
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 03:19:58PM -0800, Alan Alpert wrote:
> There were lot's of great dev day discussions started this week that
> I'd like to continue, and the question arose of "which mailing list?".
> While QML is part of Qt, I would like to ask is we could get a
> separate mailing list for d
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Thorbjørn Martsum wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Thiago Macieira
> wrote:
>>
>> In the general sense, those are the bug fixes that have a high benefit /
>> risk
>> ratio. That is, the changes they introduce are of low risk to introduce
>> more
>> regr
That sounds more like a bug in a particular usecase than a general
problem of float rounding. If we fixed the anchors so that width
didn't change on a left/right anchored item in this circumstance,
would that be enough?
--
Alan Alpert
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Dominik Holland
wrote:
> Hi,
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> In the general sense, those are the bug fixes that have a high benefit /
> risk
> ratio. That is, the changes they introduce are of low risk to introduce
> more
> regressions and unexpected behaviour changes, while fixing some important
> is