Re: [Development] RFC: What constitutes a "non-destabilising" bug-fix?

2012-12-08 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sábado, 8 de dezembro de 2012 09.53.44, Alan Alpert wrote: > This thing about the non-destabilizing bug fixes is just the release > team being cautious because we don't have a release branch yet. > Theoretically I'd have thought the release branch should have started > for RC1 and then the relea

Re: [Development] QML-Development Mailing List

2012-12-08 Thread André Pönitz
On Fri, Dec 07, 2012 at 03:19:58PM -0800, Alan Alpert wrote: > There were lot's of great dev day discussions started this week that > I'd like to continue, and the question arose of "which mailing list?". > While QML is part of Qt, I would like to ask is we could get a > separate mailing list for d

Re: [Development] RFC: What constitutes a "non-destabilising" bug-fix?

2012-12-08 Thread Alan Alpert
On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Thorbjørn Martsum wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Thiago Macieira > wrote: >> >> In the general sense, those are the bug fixes that have a high benefit / >> risk >> ratio. That is, the changes they introduce are of low risk to introduce >> more >> regr

Re: [Development] Comparing two reals in Qt code

2012-12-08 Thread Alan Alpert
That sounds more like a bug in a particular usecase than a general problem of float rounding. If we fixed the anchors so that width didn't change on a left/right anchored item in this circumstance, would that be enough? -- Alan Alpert On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Dominik Holland wrote: > Hi,

Re: [Development] RFC: What constitutes a "non-destabilising" bug-fix?

2012-12-08 Thread Thorbjørn Martsum
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > In the general sense, those are the bug fixes that have a high benefit / > risk > ratio. That is, the changes they introduce are of low risk to introduce > more > regressions and unexpected behaviour changes, while fixing some important > is