[Development] Broken class in the Qt Multimedia module

2012-12-07 Thread Sze Howe Koh
Hi all, I tried out the VideoWidget example (MSVC 2010 version of Qt 5 RC1), on Win7 32-bit), and found that it is broken. I inserted qDebug() calls immediately after QMediaPlayer::setMedia() and QMediaPlayer::play(). Here are the results: * .avi files seem to load (I got no error messages), but

[Development] Is the Qt Multimedia Widgets module part of Qt 5.0?

2012-12-07 Thread Sze Howe Koh
Hi all, The Qt Multimedia Widgets module is not listed as part of the Qt 5 release [1], and the module is not mentioned in the documentation [2]. But, its binaries are included in the Qt 5 RC1 packages, and there are examples for it. Is the module meant to be part of Qt 5.0.0 or not? Regards, Sz

Re: [Development] Reminder: FOSDEM CrossDesktop DevRoom 2013 - Call for Talks

2012-12-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
To all The deadline is next Friday. If you have an idea but can't put it to words, let me know and I can help you write your abstract. Let's organise the Qt Project participation there. I'll submit a talk about the Qt Project as a whole and Frederik has volunteered to do the Qt 5 update one al

Re: [Development] Building Qt5 from Git failed on Mac OSX

2012-12-07 Thread Fan Yang
Hi, Thanks, it works. Regards, Fan Yang On 2012-12-7, at 下午5:56, Ziller Eike wrote: > Hi, > > On 07.12.2012, at 00:26, Yang Fan wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I'm trying building Qt5 from Git on Mac OS X 10.8.2, but it fails. I used >> the following configure: >> ./configure -developer-bu

[Development] QML-Development Mailing List

2012-12-07 Thread Alan Alpert
There were lot's of great dev day discussions started this week that I'd like to continue, and the question arose of "which mailing list?". While QML is part of Qt, I would like to ask is we could get a separate mailing list for development of the QML engine and QML APIs. It seems that it's a diffe

[Development] qmake with RC1

2012-12-07 Thread Zoltán Balogh
Hi, I have built and packaged the qtbase from RC1 the very same way as I did from the Beta1 and Beta2. With the fresh qtbase packages I could not qmake not even a simple project. For example the qmake of the qtjsbackend has faild with this error: /tmp/buildd/qtjsbackend-opensource-src-5.0

Re: [Development] Running Qt auto-tests offscreen

2012-12-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 7 de dezembro de 2012 17.12.06, Jedrzej Nowacki wrote: > > I agree in theory, provided that the tests that do stress out the > > integration are close to complete testing. In practice, there's no way to > > tell whether the testing is enough, so I'd rather we keep full testing, > >

Re: [Development] Comparing two reals in Qt code

2012-12-07 Thread Dominik Holland
Hi, it took some time to get the code simple, but here is is a little example code: import QtQuick 1.0 Rectangle { id: root width: 360 height: 360 Item { id: item width: 50 height: 50 Rectangle { id: rect anch

Re: [Development] Running Qt auto-tests offscreen

2012-12-07 Thread BRM
> From: Jedrzej Nowacki >Subject: Re: [Development] Running Qt auto-tests offscreen >On Friday 7. December 2012 16.55.41 Thiago Macieira wrote: >> On sexta-feira, 7 de dezembro de 2012 11.04.27, Samuel Rødal wrote: >> > In the end, maybe we could even use this for a subset of the tests in >> > th

Re: [Development] Running Qt auto-tests offscreen

2012-12-07 Thread Jedrzej Nowacki
On Friday 7. December 2012 16.55.41 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On sexta-feira, 7 de dezembro de 2012 11.04.27, Samuel Rødal wrote: > > In the end, maybe we could even use this for a subset of the tests in > > the CI system. In my opinion, with the current platform abstraction > > layer we have in pla

Re: [Development] Running Qt auto-tests offscreen

2012-12-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 7 de dezembro de 2012 11.04.27, Samuel Rødal wrote: > In the end, maybe we could even use this for a subset of the tests in > the CI system. In my opinion, with the current platform abstraction > layer we have in place in QtGui, it's unnecessary for most of the > widgets tests to ac

Re: [Development] RFC: What constitutes a "non-destabilising" bug-fix?

2012-12-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 7 de dezembro de 2012 10.41.53, Marc Mutz wrote: > The only indication for what is acceptable for submission to 'stable' is > the text boxes in the graphics under point 2 of section Permanent > Regime: "non-destabilising bugfixes". > > For me, by definition, any bug-fix targets to

Re: [Development] Building Qt5 from Git failed on Mac OSX

2012-12-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
On sexta-feira, 7 de dezembro de 2012 11.57.06, Ziller Eike wrote: > > git://gitorious.org/qtwebkit/qt5-module.git > > > > > > > > which is old, unused and deprecated. > > Guys, wasn't there some consensus to announce changes that might destroy > people's workflows? This is the first time I hear

Re: [Development] dist/changes-x.y.z (was: Re: Branches)

2012-12-07 Thread Marc Mutz
On Friday December 7 2012, Jedrzej Nowacki wrote: > On Thursday 6. December 2012 19.08.41 Olivier Goffart wrote: > > On Thursday 06 December 2012 17:58:57 shane.kea...@accenture.com wrote: > > > > Hi Lars, > > > > > > > > On Monday December 3 2012, Knoll Lars wrote: > > > > > Dev: > > > > > > > > >

Re: [Development] Building Qt5 from Git failed on Mac OSX

2012-12-07 Thread Ziller Eike
On 07.12.2012, at 11:05, Sergio Ahumada wrote: > On 12/07/2012 10:56 AM, Ziller Eike wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 07.12.2012, at 00:26, Yang Fan wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I'm trying building Qt5 from Git on Mac OS X 10.8.2, but it fails. I used >>> the following configure: >>> ./configure -de

Re: [Development] Building Qt5 from Git failed on Mac OSX

2012-12-07 Thread Sergio Ahumada
On 12/07/2012 10:56 AM, Ziller Eike wrote: > Hi, > > On 07.12.2012, at 00:26, Yang Fan wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I'm trying building Qt5 from Git on Mac OS X 10.8.2, but it fails. I used >> the following configure: >> ./configure -developer-build -opensource -confirm-license -openssl -icu >> -no

[Development] Running Qt auto-tests offscreen

2012-12-07 Thread Samuel Rødal
Hello, do you use the CI system as a way to run the auto-tests? Are you tired of having to wait forever for the widgets auto-tests to run, at the same time as they pop up a hundred windows and dialogs that steal the focus and prevent you from doing any work? In that case I'm working on a solut

Re: [Development] Building Qt5 from Git failed on Mac OSX

2012-12-07 Thread Ziller Eike
Hi, On 07.12.2012, at 00:26, Yang Fan wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm trying building Qt5 from Git on Mac OS X 10.8.2, but it fails. I used the > following configure: > ./configure -developer-build -opensource -confirm-license -openssl -icu > -nomake tests -nomake demos -nomake examples -platform ma

[Development] RFC: What constitutes a "non-destabilising" bug-fix?

2012-12-07 Thread Marc Mutz
Hi, This is a Request For Clarification regarding http://qt-project.org/wiki/Branch-Guidelines -> Permanent Regime/2 The definition of the branches at the top of the page only talks about the quality of the code, not what kind of changes are acceptable. The only indication for what is acceptab

Re: [Development] dist/changes-x.y.z (was: Re: Branches)

2012-12-07 Thread Jedrzej Nowacki
On Thursday 6. December 2012 19.08.41 Olivier Goffart wrote: > On Thursday 06 December 2012 17:58:57 shane.kea...@accenture.com wrote: > > > Hi Lars, > > > > > > On Monday December 3 2012, Knoll Lars wrote: > > > > Dev: > > > > > > > > Dev is the branch where you can land anything that's supposed

[Development] (no subject)

2012-12-07 Thread nicola
Hi, Martin Fowler talk in this article (http://www.martinfowler.com/articles/mobileImplStrategy.html) of portable body (slide 23). He talk thinking a web, i instead think to Qt/Qml, where Qml is the native gui and c++/javascript is the portable body. Is exsisting a benchmark between qml/Qt vs Hybr