On 04.12.2012, at 18:56, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>
> 04.12.2012, 21:02, "Pau Garcia i Quiles" :
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Konstantin Tokarev
> > wrote:
> >
> >> There's no point in keeping separate branch purely f
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> Here's a question to the project: do we want to merge (-s ours) the releases
> from vendors into our official tree? And do we want their tags too?
Speaking with my Mer Project (/Jolla) hat on:
I don't think direct merges would work, at le
On 04/12/12 18:28, Martin Smith wrote:
> What about changes to qdoc? It doesn't have autotests.
There's a first time for everything ;)
--
Link
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/develop
I don't know what he meant, but I wondering if it makes sense to
create QPA plugin for VNC or rdesktop.
tr3w
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On terça-feira, 4 de dezembro de 2012 10.21.55, Salomon, Florian wrote:
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> i needed to know if and when VN
On terça-feira, 4 de dezembro de 2012 18.21.17, Vladimir Minenko wrote:
> Ok... Well, I can also ask a good question why you bump the version to 4.8.5
> before it is actually released. You probably will have a good answer,
> likewise I will also have a good answer why bumping the version disturbs
>
It's not difficult to understand. For example, 4.8.4 was released, it means
v4.8.4 was taged. All later changes after that in 4.8 branch don't belong to
4.8.4. They must be part of next release of 4.8 branch, obviously it is 4.8.5.
So the version bumps to 4.8.5 should happen just after 4.8.4 rel
> I agree with Ossi. Your request doesn't make sense, Vladimir.
>
> If you're taking the latest 4.8 branch instead of the released packages,
> you're
> in for a lot more trouble. I suggest creating your own branch based on
> 4.8.4 and cherry-picking any commits you need into it.
Ok... Well, I ca
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>
> 04.12.2012, 21:02, "Pau Garcia i Quiles" :
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Konstantin Tokarev
> wrote:
> >
> >> There's no point in keeping separate branch purely for tags. It is just
> an unnecessary overcomplication.
> > Actually
04.12.2012, 21:02, "Pau Garcia i Quiles" :
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>
>> There's no point in keeping separate branch purely for tags. It is just an
>> unnecessary overcomplication.
> Actually, there is: it allows you to continue working in stabilization
> bran
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> There's no point in keeping separate branch purely for tags. It is just an
> unnecessary overcomplication.
>
Actually, there is: it allows you to continue working in stabilization
branches, then discard those changes (i. e. never releas
04.12.2012, 19:56, "Pau Garcia i Quiles" :
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 07:53:41AM +, Vladimir Minenko wrote:
>>> > After yesterdays release we are planning to bump the Qt 4 version to
>>> > 4.8.5.
>>>
>>> Guys, would it be a big
On terça-feira, 4 de dezembro de 2012 10.21.55, Salomon, Florian wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> i needed to know if and when VNC-support is planed for Qt5?
What do you want supported?
Do you want to be able to see regular Qt applications when using a VNC server
on X? If so, that should be supporte
On terça-feira, 4 de dezembro de 2012 11.56.39, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 07:53:41AM +, Vladimir Minenko wrote:
> > > After yesterdays release we are planning to bump the Qt 4 version to
> > > 4.8.5.
> >
> > Guys, would it be a big problem to wait with this until the e
On 04.12.2012 12:28, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 04:29:24PM +, Knoll Lars wrote:
>> Dev is the branch where you can land anything that's supposed to go into
>> 5.1. The following policies apply:
>>
>> Stable:
>>
>> This branch will be the basis for Qt 5.0 and subsequent
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 04:29:24PM +, Knoll Lars wrote:
> Dev is the branch where you can land anything that's supposed to go into 5.1.
> The following policies apply:
>
> Stable:
>
> This branch will be the basis for Qt 5.0 and subsequent patch level releases.
> The following policies appl
Hello,
There are new packages available for testing on Linux and Mac. We're working on
Windows installer package.
http://releases.qt-project.org/digia/5.0.0_rc1/backups/2012-12-04-363/
Please feel free to test them. We will appreciate your feedback.
Known issues are to be found here:
http://qt
On Nov 29, 2012, at 10:47 AM, Jarkko Laitinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I sent a message to this mailing list a while ago and got couple of
> responses. I have developed QCloud, an API that enables integration of Amazon
> S3 and Windows Azure to Qt applications. The project has been done in
> conjunc
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 07:53:41AM +, Vladimir Minenko wrote:
> > After yesterdays release we are planning to bump the Qt 4 version to 4.8.5.
>
> Guys, would it be a big problem to wait with this until the end of this week?
> We are releasing the final NDK this week and a change in the versio
Hi!
somehow my previous mail didn't make it. So better late then never:
I'm happy to announce that Qt 4.8.4 has just been released.
See the blog on http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2012/11/29/qt-4-8-4-released/
and the changes file at http://qt.digia.com/Release-Notes/Release-Notes-Qt-484/
for det
Hello everybody,
i needed to know if and when VNC-support is planed for Qt5?
regards
Florian
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
On Dec 3, 2012, at 11:46 PM, Lincoln Ramsay wrote:
> On 04/12/12 02:29, Knoll Lars wrote:
>> since there has been some confusion about the branches we created, let me
>> try to clarify
>
> ... and document on a wiki or something? For the people that won't see
> this email but might search for
21 matches
Mail list logo
