Re: [Development] The final mile

2012-12-01 Thread Koehne Kai
> From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > [development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] on behalf of Thiago > Macieira [thiago.macie...@intel.com] >> On segunda-feira, 19 de novembro de 2012 20.09.35, Knoll Lars wrote: >> * WebKit library split (WebKit + WebKi

[Development] a question about Qt for Symbian

2012-12-01 Thread Qi Liang
Hi, all, 5.0 branching is almost finished this weekend. And I just started to go through "Not Evaluated" items in jira(https://bugreports.qt-project.org/) last night. I found there are still about less than 300 tasks in open/reported status. I tried "git log --grep="symbian" --regexp-ignore-ca

Re: [Development] The final mile

2012-12-01 Thread Thiago Macieira
On segunda-feira, 19 de novembro de 2012 20.09.35, Knoll Lars wrote: > * WebKit library split (WebKit + WebKitWidgets) > > This is a binary incompatible change, that has to go in for 5.0. Most of the > QtWebKit team is working on this, and I have good confidence that the > change will be and done

Re: [Development] Branching 5.0

2012-12-01 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 28 de novembro de 2012 19.47.47, Knoll Lars wrote: > Transitional only. Will be closed for new pushes once the branches get > created. Patches that are already in gerrit can still be staged for around > a week to allow everybody to stage their pending changes. Master will then > ge

Re: [Development] Branching 5.0

2012-12-01 Thread Ahumada Sergio
Hi, > … this time for real… :) The branching has been finished for the following projects: - qt5 - qtactiveqt - qtbase - qtdeclarative - qtdoc - qtgraphicaleffects - qtimageformats - qtjsbackend - qtmultimedia - qtquick1 - qtscript - qtsvg - qttools - qttranslations - qtwebkit - qtwebkit-example

Re: [Development] Branching 5.0

2012-12-01 Thread Laszlo Papp
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On sexta-feira, 30 de novembro de 2012 11.43.19, Laszlo Papp wrote: > > Perhaps, I was unclear. I think he raised a valid concern about the > > "stable" name, but that does not mean I support "testing". > > No, he didn't. His logic was flaw

Re: [Development] Nominating Mitch Curtis for approver

2012-12-01 Thread Knoll Lars
Another +1 from me. Cheers, Lars On Dec 1, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Hausmann Simon wrote: > +1 > > Simon > > -- > Sendt fra min Nokia N901.12.12 01:53 skrev Thiago Macieira: > On sexta-feira, 30 de novembro de 2012 10.55.31, Zeno Albisser wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Jedrzej Nowacki

Re: [Development] Nominating Mitch Curtis for approver

2012-12-01 Thread Hausmann Simon
+1 Simon -- Sendt fra min Nokia N901.12.12 01:53 skrev Thiago Macieira: On sexta-feira, 30 de novembro de 2012 10.55.31, Zeno Albisser wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Jedrzej Nowacki > wrote: > > > > I would like to propose Mitch Curtis for approver status. > > I am actually quite i