> From: d3fault
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 11:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [Development] Branching 5.0
>
> On 11/30/12, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> He says that the converse usually holds true. First of all, converses
>> usually
>> do not hold true. Conditions that are both necessary and suffic
On 11/30/12, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> He says that the converse usually holds true. First of all, converses
> usually
> do not hold true. Conditions that are both necessary and sufficient are the
>
> exception, not the rule. Second, it does not hold in this case either.
>
I never said most/all co
On sexta-feira, 30 de novembro de 2012 12.17.46, victor...@legrand.com.cn
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anyone knows if QRegExp supports positive/negative lookbehind or not with
> Qt5 beta 2? I tried with lookahead which is supported, but I am not sure
> about lookbehind.
QRegExp in Qt 5 supports exactly the
On sexta-feira, 30 de novembro de 2012 14.25.22, Samuel Rødal wrote:
> On 11/30/2012 02:15 PM, Robin Burchell wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Sergio Ahumada
> >
> > wrote:
> >> I wonder if these should be documented under dist/changes-5.0.0 ?
> >
> > Well, this specific example is remo
On sexta-feira, 30 de novembro de 2012 10.55.31, Zeno Albisser wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Jedrzej Nowacki > wrote:
> >
> > I would like to propose Mitch Curtis for approver status.
>
> I am actually quite impressed, how he is continuously hunting down the bugs!
> Keep up the good
On sexta-feira, 30 de novembro de 2012 11.43.19, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> Perhaps, I was unclear. I think he raised a valid concern about the
> "stable" name, but that does not mean I support "testing".
No, he didn't. His logic was flawed (as often his arguments are).
He said:
"A release is implicitl
On Nov 24, 2012, at 12:09 PM, Nurmi J-P wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks to QStyleFactory and QProxyStyle, it is possible to instantiate and
> customize any available style. This is not limited to the built-in styles in
> QtWidgets, but also works fine for any style plugin since it nicely avoids
>
Use QRegularExpression in Qt5 then you get full PCRE.
Cheers
Rich.
On 30 November 2012 19:17, wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Anyone knows if QRegExp supports positive/negative lookbehind or not with
> Qt5 beta 2? I tried with lookahead which is supported, but I am not sure
> about lookbehind.
>
> Thanks.
I have just read that gstreamer now works on android. I suppose that this
is a good news for Qt video/Audio decoding on android ?
http://www.fluendo.com/press/gstreamer-sdk-now-offers-support-developing-multimedia-playback-android/
___
Development mailing
Hi,
Anyone knows if QRegExp supports positive/negative lookbehind or not with
Qt5 beta 2? I tried with lookahead which is supported, but I am not sure
about lookbehind.
Thanks.
Victor
Ce message, ainsi que tous les fichiers joints à ce message,
peuvent contenir des informations sensibles et
On 30.11.2012, at 13:02, Tobias Hunger wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I would like to nominate Orgad Shaneh for the role as maintainer of the
> ClearCase plugin in Qt Creator.
+1 from me
> We merged a patch yesterday removing the experimental tag from the
> ClearCase plugin, so it is time to nominate
Hi,
After yesterdays release we are planning to bump the Qt 4 version to 4.8.5.
The actual change is https://codereview.qt-project.org/41333
Cheers,
--
Sergio Ahumada
Release Engineer - Digia, Qt
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
Oswald,
I do not understand how qtPrepareTool() can help me? (We are talking about and
not Qt4.8.x Qt5.0.x)
This function only sets the variable QDOC to the \bin\ qdoc3.exe but me needed
set another variable QTDOC to environment!
I'm create nev file my.prf and copy to qtAddToolEnv function, t
On 11/30/2012 02:15 PM, Robin Burchell wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Sergio Ahumada
> wrote:
>> I wonder if these should be documented under dist/changes-5.0.0 ?
>
> Well, this specific example is removal of API added within 5.0.0,
> isn't it? So I don't see why it makes sense to docum
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Sergio Ahumada
wrote:
> I wonder if these should be documented under dist/changes-5.0.0 ?
Well, this specific example is removal of API added within 5.0.0,
isn't it? So I don't see why it makes sense to document that.
__
On 11/30/2012 02:06 PM, Samuel Rødal wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I take the blame for breaking the qtwebkit build by merging the
> QQuickItem::pos() API change, and fully agree with Simon that a good way
> to prevent these issues in the future is to send a notice to the mailing
> list about SIC changes.
>
Hello,
I take the blame for breaking the qtwebkit build by merging the
QQuickItem::pos() API change, and fully agree with Simon that a good way
to prevent these issues in the future is to send a notice to the mailing
list about SIC changes.
We're now trying to get https://codereview.qt-project
On 11/30/2012 09:51 AM, Jedrzej Nowacki wrote:
> On Friday 30. November 2012 09.23.32 Samuel Rødal wrote:
>> Yep, having something similar to AlmostEqualUlpsAndAbs() would be great.
>> I've had some ideas of making qFuzzyCompare work that way in the past,
>> but gave them up due to not wanting to r
Hello!
I would like to nominate Orgad Shaneh for the role as maintainer of the
ClearCase plugin in Qt Creator.
We merged a patch yesterday removing the experimental tag from the
ClearCase plugin, so it is time to nominate a maintainer for it. Orgad
has originally written this plugin and has be
>
> Sure he did, but in the context of naming a concern is easy to respond to
> with
> a counter argument. For example it makes the other branches look like
> they're
> not subject to testing.
Perhaps, I was unclear. I think he raised a valid concern about the
"stable" name, but that does not me
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 07:47:47PM +, Knoll Lars wrote:
> * master:
>
> Only binary compatible changes are allowed into this branch, as it'll be
> merged to dev later on.
>
i would suggest that the assumed merge target is "stable" until a weeks
or two after the branching - many already poste
Qt Project Security Advisory
Title:QML XmlHttpRequest Insecure Redirection
Risk Rating: Low
Platforms:All
Modules: QtQuick1, QtDeclarative
Versions: 4.8.3 and previous
Author: Richard J. Moore
Date: 17 November 2012
Overview
--
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 11:50:17AM +0400, Denis Shienkov wrote:
> 30.11.2012, 02:31, "Lincoln Ramsay" :
> >docs_target.commands = "$$set QTDOC=$$QTDOC && $$QDOC3 $$QDOCCONF"
>
> Also this solution on Windows does not work either. I already checked... When
> is this solution, Makefile contains a t
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Jedrzej Nowacki wrote:
> I would like to propose Mitch Curtis for approver status.
>
I am actually quite impressed, how he is continuously hunting down the bugs!
Keep up the good spirit! ;)
+1 from my side.
Zeno
___
I would like to propose Mitch Curtis for approver status.
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#q,owner:+mitch,n,z
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#dashboard,1001967
Mitch is working in the Digia Oslo office. In last few months he contributed
more then 100 patches in different areas; mainly in do
On Friday 30. November 2012 09.23.32 Samuel Rødal wrote:
> Yep, having something similar to AlmostEqualUlpsAndAbs() would be great.
> I've had some ideas of making qFuzzyCompare work that way in the past,
> but gave them up due to not wanting to risk subtly breaking a lot of
> existing code. Introd
On Friday, November 30, 2012 05:38:22 AM Laszlo Papp wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Knoll Lars wrote:
> > I know that branch naming is a possible topic for endless bike shedding.
> > You can always find arguments against a certain name here. In the end it's
> > not the most important th
... pretty please (with a red cherry on top) give everyone a heads-up ahead of
time.
This is the second time within the same week that a source incompatible change
is staged _before_ giving a heads-up. (QStyle subclasses on Monday)
The renaming of QQuickItem::pos() to position() is certainly a
On 11/29/2012 07:38 PM, Sean Harmer wrote:
> On 29/11/2012 18:34, BRM wrote:
>>> From: Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com>
>>> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 11:52 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [Development] Comparing two reals in Qt code
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Sean Harmer wrote:
On Nov 30, 2012, at 6:38 AM, Laszlo Papp mailto:lp...@kde.org>>
wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Knoll Lars
mailto:lars.kn...@digia.com>> wrote:
I know that branch naming is a possible topic for endless bike shedding. You
can always find arguments against a certain name here. In the end
30 matches
Mail list logo
