On 11/20/2012 05:05 PM, Alan Alpert wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Jana Aurindam
> wrote:
>>
To summarize QML tool naming discussion so far:
In qtquick1 repo
qmlviewer -> qml1viewer
qmlplugindump -> qml1plugindump
>>
>>> That's already the name, isn't it?
>>
>
Thanks for your reply. When I run configure with -developer-build, the
issue disappears, seems a bit stupid:(
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Qi Liang wrote:
> Sorry, can't reproduce your issue on 10.6.8. The default compiler on
> 10.6.8 + xcode 3.2.6 should be g++ 4.2, not clang++. Apple doe
Last week in Berlin, Ossi, some others and I finally got together and hashed
out what remained to be discussed. We concluded the following for the co-
installation of tools:
Principle: Qt installs by themselves do not support co-installation of any
binaries to the same prefix's bindir. Instead,
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> > There are two points I'd like to add to the discussion. Firstly
>> > qmlbundle isn't
>> > really useful yet, I'd advocate moving it to the playground or somewhere
>> > outside the qtdeclarative module until it's done.
>>
>> I've been
Hi,
> There are two points I'd like to add to the discussion. Firstly qmlbundle
> isn't
> > really useful yet, I'd advocate moving it to the playground or somewhere
> > outside the qtdeclarative module until it's done.
>
> I've been wondering about this too. There's zero documentation of it right
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Mitch Curtis wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 04:32:04 PM André Somers wrote:
> > Op 20-11-2012 16:04, Tanilkan Sinan schreef:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to propose that we establish the mailing list:
> qt-l...@qt-project.org, to take over for the pre
On terça-feira, 20 de novembro de 2012 13.15.47, Sorvig Morten wrote:
> > Let me give you an example of a thread pool used differently: the DNS
> > resolver code in QtNetwork. It uses 5 threads, regardless of how many
> > CPU cores you have. It involves a blocking call. And as such, it must not
>
On Tuesday, November 20, 2012 04:32:04 PM André Somers wrote:
> Op 20-11-2012 16:04, Tanilkan Sinan schreef:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose that we establish the mailing list:
> > qt-l...@qt-project.org, to take over for the previous qt-l10n list.
> >
> > We believe there are people who a
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Koehne Kai wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> ...
>> Secondly qmleasing and
>> easingcurveeditor really should be merged. They both generate custom
>> easing curve strings for QtQuick 2 animations, just from different
>> parameters. I'll start that change late
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Jana Aurindam
> wrote:
>>
To summarize QML tool naming discussion so far:
In qtquick1 repo
qmlviewer -> qml1viewer
qmlplugindump -> qml1plugindump
>>
>>> That's
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Jana Aurindam wrote:
>
>>> To summarize QML tool naming discussion so far:
>>>
>>> In qtquick1 repo
>>> qmlviewer -> qml1viewer
>>> qmlplugindump -> qml1plugindump
>
>> That's already the name, isn't it?
>
>>> In qtdeclarative repo
>>> qmlscene -> qml2scene
>>> qm
>> To summarize QML tool naming discussion so far:
>>
>> In qtquick1 repo
>> qmlviewer -> qml1viewer
>> qmlplugindump -> qml1plugindump
> That's already the name, isn't it?
>> In qtdeclarative repo
>> qmlscene -> qml2scene
>> qmlplugindump -> qml2plugindump
>> qmlbundle -> move to playground
>
Hi
I am excited to inform you all that we are discussing to open up web
development for http://qt-project.org towards open governance for our community.
Right now we use IRC for discussion but now there is a clear need for mailing
list so our discussion can reach to all people in all time zone.
Op 20-11-2012 16:04, Tanilkan Sinan schreef:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose that we establish the mailing list:
> qt-l...@qt-project.org, to take over for the previous qt-l10n list.
>
> We believe there are people who are interested in localization, that do not
> follow the developer mailing l
Hello Qt developers.
When trying to build documentation for custom addon with qdoc for qt5-beta2 on
Windows:
$nmake docs
I get the following error:
g:\Qt\Qt5.0.0beta2\5.0.0-beta2\msvc2010\bin\qdoc.exe
-outputdir
G:/git/ng/qtserialport-build-Desktop_Qt_5_0_0_beta2_MSVC2010_32bit_SDK-Release/d
Hi,
I would like to propose that we establish the mailing list:
qt-l...@qt-project.org, to take over for the previous qt-l10n list.
We believe there are people who are interested in localization, that do not
follow the developer mailing list.
Br,
Sinan
_
On Nov 19, 2012, at 4:42 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 19 de novembro de 2012 14.03.17, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>>> - The core of a concurrency engine should be a work-stealing data
>>> structure/scheduler. Qt Concurrent has simple work-stealing
>>> functionality, but is to t
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org
> [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On
> Behalf Of Alan Alpert
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 1:41 AM
> To:
> Cc: Thiago Macieira
> Subject: [Development] QML Tooling Ren
On Tuesday, 2012-11-20, Michal Dorner wrote:
> qmlRegisterType("MyModule", 1, 0, "Test");
>
> engine = new QQmlEngine();
>
>
> component = new QQmlComponent(engine,
> QUrl::fromLocalFile("module.qml"));
>
>
> if (!component->isLoading()) {
I think you can just call component-
Jerome, thanks for the information.
Besr regards,
Denis
20.11.2012, 15:03, "Pasion Jerome" :
> Hello,
>
> Our intention is to include most of the Qt modules (in Qt Project) to our
> snapshot: http://doc-snapshot.qt-project.org/
> The site replacement, which has the links to the Qt 5.0 modules wi
2012/11/19 Koehne Kai
>
> Hi,
>
> Even if you're not using QML, you might look into using it's debugging
> infrastructure. All you'll probably have to do is create a dummy QQmlEngine
> at the start of your app: Since breakpoints, stepping are global for v8,
> you should be able to debug any JS cod
Hello,
Our intention is to include most of the Qt modules (in Qt Project) to our
snapshot: http://doc-snapshot.qt-project.org/
The site replacement, which has the links to the Qt 5.0 modules will launch
once we merge the newdocs branches into master (starting today).
The snapshot site will only
On 20/11/2012, at 6:20 PM, Knoll Lars wrote:
> Hi Lorn,
>
> On Nov 20, 2012, at 1:42 AM, Lorn Potter wrote:
>
>>
>> On 20/11/2012, at 6:09 AM, Knoll Lars wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> The beta2 is a very good milestone towards Qt 5. We now have packages that
>>> include the full content of what we a
On 11/20/2012 10:01 AM, Jedrzej Nowacki wrote:
> On Monday 19. November 2012 21.09.35 Knoll Lars wrote:
>> The package creation time is currently being addressed, and hopefully we'll
>> soon be able to get that time down to around 2-3 hours (from 7-8
>> currently). In addition, I'd like to ask anyb
On Monday 19. November 2012 21.09.35 Knoll Lars wrote:
> The package creation time is currently being addressed, and hopefully we'll
> soon be able to get that time down to around 2-3 hours (from 7-8
> currently). In addition, I'd like to ask anybody to be careful with
> changes that might affect p
So what? Me wait for an answer?
Best regards,
Denis
16.11.2012, 13:10, "Denis Shienkov" :
> Hello all.
>
> Please tell me, is it possible to somehow put the documentation for custom
> add-on (eg QtSerialPort) of Qt Playground
> on http://qt-project.org/doc/ or somewhere else?
>
> For example, I'
Sorry, can't reproduce your issue on 10.6.8. The default compiler on 10.6.8 +
xcode 3.2.6 should be g++ 4.2, not clang++. Apple doesn't provide it. So maybe
you are asking for the support of clang++ on 10.6, I guess.
And I think it's better to talk this kind of issue in "interest" mailing list,
Hi,
[snip]
Does anyone have any further feedback on QML tool renaming before
> these get implemented?
>
+1 from me, but I don't mind if qmlbundle stays where it is as an
undocumented, internal, no guarantees, tool, just because it's less effort.
Cheers,
Chris.
__
Hi Lorn,
On Nov 20, 2012, at 1:42 AM, Lorn Potter wrote:
>
> On 20/11/2012, at 6:09 AM, Knoll Lars wrote:
>
>>
>> The beta2 is a very good milestone towards Qt 5. We now have packages that
>> include the full content of what we agreed to ship, including Qt Creator.
>> Also our bug numbers
29 matches
Mail list logo
