Re: [Development] Is QtConcurrent's code generator still in use?

2012-11-18 Thread Sorvig Morten
On Nov 14, 2012, at 4:24 PM, Christian Kandeler wrote: > On 11/14/2012 12:17 PM, Sorvig Morten wrote: >> QtConcurrent is done. The implementation is not good enough to be used as a >> base for further development. > > Can you be a bit more specific? What are the general problems and why > ca

[Development] Reverting change that adds new symbol to Qt 4.8.5

2012-11-18 Thread Thiago Macieira
Hello I've just realised that commit 17bea1689abc695d88f13cd15f73b0a59fcffdff adds new symbols to Qt 4.8.5 and should be reverted. Adding new symbols in Qt 4.8.x is not permitted. This change is NOT included in Qt 4.8.4, which is why it's not so urgent. The last email about 4.8.4 indicates it

Re: [Development] The future of QFuture, and QtConcurrent (was "Is QtConcurrent's code generator still in use?")

2012-11-18 Thread Sze Howe Koh
On 18 November 2012 20:29, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On domingo, 18 de novembro de 2012 12.26.25, Sze Howe Koh wrote: >> On 16 November 2012 07:39, Thiago Macieira > wrote: >> > I'd like to see someone give TBB a Qt-ish API wrapper. >> >> How would the licensing work if, say, a Qt Commercial custo

Re: [Development] The future of QFuture, and QtConcurrent (was "Is QtConcurrent's code generator still in use?")

2012-11-18 Thread Thiago Macieira
On domingo, 18 de novembro de 2012 12.36.25, Sze Howe Koh wrote: > Speaking of which, is there a reason why QFuture* classes are still in > Qt Core? QFuture is meant to be created through QtConcurrent > functions, if I'm not mistaken. "Are still" is wrong. They were moved back to QtCore, so we cou

Re: [Development] The future of QFuture, and QtConcurrent (was "Is QtConcurrent's code generator still in use?")

2012-11-18 Thread Thiago Macieira
On domingo, 18 de novembro de 2012 12.26.25, Sze Howe Koh wrote: > On 16 November 2012 07:39, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > I'd like to see someone give TBB a Qt-ish API wrapper. > > How would the licensing work if, say, a Qt Commercial customer uses > Qt-wrapped TBB, encounters a problem involving

Re: [Development] QJSEngine debuging

2012-11-18 Thread Richard Moore
On 18 November 2012 11:44, Michal Dorner wrote: > I wonder if it's possible to get v8 handle from QJSEngine instance and > enable debuging using v8 api. > Goal is to provide debuging with greakpoints and steps using Eclipse plugin > or something like node-inspector in Node.js > > Could someone ple

[Development] QJSEngine debuging

2012-11-18 Thread Michal Dorner
Hi, i'm student at FIIT STU and my team is working on qt based server application. I realy like idea to make application extendable via JavaScript modules and probably implement some trivial core functionality in it too. Our plan is to switch project

Re: [Development] CI status update

2012-11-18 Thread Aaron McCarthy
Hi Janne, On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 11:09:02 PM Anttila Janne wrote: > 16. QtLocation and QtConnectivity CI is broken due to the fact that their > dependencies were removed from Qt5.git > -> CI uses init-repository script to fetch dependencies listed in > sync.profile -> Because Qt5.git does not