On 14 November 2012 19:17, Sorvig Morten wrote:
> I think what QtConcurrent really needs is a plan. What do we want it to be?
> There are several options, and I'd like to offer the "null" option:
>
> QtConcurrent is done. The implementation is not good enough to be used as a
> base for further d
On 16 November 2012 07:39, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> I'd like to see someone give TBB a Qt-ish API wrapper.
How would the licensing work if, say, a Qt Commercial customer uses
Qt-wrapped TBB, encounters a problem involving upstream TBB, and needs
paid support? Would Digia need to purchase a commer
> I have some ideas on some neat things we could add to Qt3D in the future
Could you please mention a few of them? Thank you for standing up!
Laszlo
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
On 17/11/2012 10:09, Eric Kom wrote:
> Good day,
>
> Please after downloaded and tried to installed without success QT5
> beta2 using this link:
> http://origin.releases.qt-project.org/qt5.0/beta2/qt-windows-opensource-5.0.0-beta2-msvc2010_32-x86-offline.exe
>
> The installer said the installation
Good day,
Please after downloaded and tried to installed without success QT5
beta2 using this link:
http://origin.releases.qt-project.org/qt5.0/beta2/qt-windows-opensource-5.0.0-beta2-msvc2010_32-x86-offline.exe
The installer said the installation path must not contain !@#$%^&*:,; or
spaces
T
